Da 7 9 F- Department Of State Authority 7 0610 V GA SECRET O V PS 1 5- pAqE a GENEVA alike zanaaez N A ACTION ACDA 17 it - INFO 01C 19 Nsc GHIINR 07 T DOD 02 sc1 05 35 11 AF ZIAGPH 0318C OIISAH QQLL T ARA 191EA 19 10 ZIIUSIA a1aRsc 2 - 1609322 OCT 67 EM USMISSION GENEVA To SECSTAIE NASHDC PRIORITY 5#96 INFO AHEMBASSY PARIS 115$ AHENSASSV Moscow 459 r USUN NY 1233 a GENEVA 1140 bet 5 9 REF GENEVA 1121 SUBJECT DISCUSSION HIIH SOVIEIS 0N MEXICAW AMENDMENTS DEPALMA AND NEIDLE NET WITH ANTYASOV USSR To HEAR INFORMAL sov REACTIONS To US PBOPOS Ls DESCRIBED IN REFTELO 2 ANTYASOV SAID US VERSION ART IV PARA Ia GENEVA 5 loge on PEACEFUL USES LOOKED ACCEPTABLE T0 gov DEL f r no 8 -3 MEXICAN ART IV-A 0N PEACEFUL NUCLEAR SECRET DECLASSIFIED Authority gm 76 2 app I Department of State SECRET PAGE P2 GENEVA 01140 1012362 EXPLOSIVE DEVICES PARA 8 OF STATE 49458 WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE TO SOVS BUT SOV DEL BELIEVES IT NOT SATISFACTORY FOR NON ALIGNED BECAUSE 0F ABSENCE OE REFERENCE TO ROLE OP AN INTERNATIONAL AND I2 ABSENCE OF REFERENCE TO PROCEDURES BEING ESTABLISHED IN A sovs SAID THEY ALREADY HVE STRONG HINTS MANY NON-ALIGNED WILL INSIST ON THESE TWO ELEMENTS AND SOVS THEIR OWN WORDS CCULD BE QUOTED AGAINST THEM IF THESE NOT INCLUDED DEPALHA YRGUED THAT WE WISH TO AVOID ANY INFERENCE THAT ALL REQUESTS FOR SERVICES AND ALL PROJECTS INCUDING THOSE OF NUCLEARS MUST BE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL AGREEMENT AND CHANNELLED THROUGH INTERNATIONAL BODY WE COULD NOT BE GURE NOW WHETHER ONE BROAD AGREEMEN WOULD BE 0R SEVERAL AGREEMENTS PROTOCOLS RESOLUTIONS OR ANY COMBINATIONS OF HE SINCE US VERSION WOULD APPARENTLY BE ACCEPTABLE To sovs WHETHER WE COULD NOT TRY IT OUT ON SOVS ANSWERED THEY NOT INCLINEDRECOMMEND THAT MOSCOW AUTHORIZE SOV ACCEPTANCE BECAUSE THEY WERE CERTAIN IT wouLD NOTBE SATISFACTORY TO AND WHOLE PURPOSE OR EXERCISE HAS TO MEET REQUESTS OF RESPONSIBLE sovs SUGGESTED us 05 CONSIDER ALONG LINES PAGE 3 RUFHGV 114W 3 OTE PARTY To THIS TREATY T0 COOPERATE T0 -A NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE To NON-NUCLEAR WEAPON STATES PARTY TO THIS TREATY ON A BASIS THROUGH APPROPRIATE INTERNATIONAL BODIES WITH ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION 0F STATES SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES TO BE ESTABLISHED IN A SPECIAL AGREEMENT 0R ANDTHAT THE CHARGE To SUCH FARTIES FOR THE EXPLOSIVE DEVICES USED WILL BE As LOW AS POSSIBLE AND EXCLUDE ANY CHARGE FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT- UNDTE Anon- 0- - - HATP TVA- 40 RE EST ON FOR OPERATIVE ARTICLE ON DISARMAMENT IPARA ANTYASOV SAID FLATLY USE OF WORD WAS SDVS GAVE FOLLOWING REASONS IN ADDITION TorHosE CONTAINED PARA 3 REFTELI I WORD NOT IN MEXICAN ITS INCLUSION WOULD NOT BE RESPONSIVE SECRET Department of State Autho W Mm SECRET PAGE OS GENEVA 10 2362 To A NON ALIGNED REQUEST 2 SOVS HAVE REFRAINED FROM ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL HORDS OR PHRASES THEY KNOW HE CANNOT ACCEPT SUCH As I3 THIS SHOULD NOT BE A MATTER OF PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE ROR u SINCE EVERYBODY KNows US HILL NOT AGREE To ANY MEASURE UNLESS IT CONSIDERS THAT VERIFICATION ASPECT IS SATISFACTORY AND LIMITED TEST BAN TREATY CALLEO FOR NEGOTIATION OF COMPREHENSIVE TEST BAN BUT DID NOT USE HDRO AND THIS HAS NOT PREVENTED INSISTING ON HHAT IT BELIEVES To BE ADEQUATE VERIFICATION PAGE A RUFHGV IIAO 5 DESPITE URGING OF DELOFFS 0v$ THEY HOULD RECOMMEND TO Moscow FAVDRAGLE CONSIDERATION OF HDRD DEPALMA OUT THAT NEED FOR HORD HAS PATICULARLY RELEVANT HHEN ARTICLE TALKED ABOUT ARRIVING AT AGREEMENTS HE HAS NOT SURE IF REQUIBEMENT 0F ARRIVING AT AGREEMENTS HAS DELETED NHETHER OR NOT IT HOULD BE POSSIBLE FOR US CONSIDER ALTERNATIVE LANGUAGE IN HHICH PARTIES HOULD UNDERTAKE To PURSUE NEGOTIATIONS IN GOOD FAITH REGARDING CESSATION oF THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE AND DISARMAMENT AND REGARDING AN AGREEMENT ON GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT UNDER STRICT AND EFFECTIVE INTERNATIONAL CONTROL- SOVS THOUGHT FORMULATION ALONGTHESE LINES MIGHT PROVE ACCEPTABLE BUT SUGGESTED IT HOULD BE BETTER To REFER Io DISARHAMENT FOLLOHING THE REFERENCE TO CESSATION OF THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE THEY THOUGHT IHERE WOULD BE MUCH CONFUSION AS TO DIFFERENCE BETNEEN GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAHENT AND IN PRECEDING PHRASE HDNEVER HOULD CLEARLY INCLUDE LIMITED AND PARTIAL OISARMAMENT STEPS PAGES RUFHGV IIAO 6 ON US SUGGESTION To COMBINE DISARMRMENT PARA A OF REFTELI SOVS SAID THEY NDULD NON PREFER LEAVE PREAMBLE EXACTLY As Is AND NOT COHBINE PARAS DEPALMA REPEATED ARGUMENTS MADE BY FISHER IN PRRA 5 REFTEL SOVS SAID THEY HOULD THINK OVER FURTHER AND HINTED THEY MIGHT BE SECRET 530an Wk UQSESQE SN 3 2 L # 232 I a 3 mm2m rm-n nczmuzm n mpm n ocmquoz z m morqmo q oz mzmommx ram urmomm o mo m Hzomnquu Ha avalw mm Mom cm oho zo qruzx a zo mo mm4m unnmo neunr mzmz msocro zow xm 24 nmo nonm ux_m Hom w mo omronnm nnm mmo nocummnm Hz atlm nuanom r nocro mm rmn4 non r 4mn mozmwomn qmoz n4mn o xann z zmzozm24mt mca moan -omr wo 0 ram nrmomm oz mr mv-w mex This document is from the holdings of The National Security Archive Suite 701 Gelman Library The George Washington University 2130 H Street NW Washington D C 20037 Phone 202 994-7000 Fax 202 994-7005 nsarchiv@gwu edu