i A0 9i Rev till i Criminal Complaint 'oRiaiNAL UNITED STATEEREISTRICT COURT Northern District of California MAR 2 5 2015 United States ofAmerica RICHARD W WIEKING I LERK U S DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN OF CALIFORNIA CARL MARK FORCE IVDefendant s a MEJ CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I the complainant in this case state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge and belief On or about the date s of 2012 through 2013 in the county of San Francisco in the Northern District of California the defendant s violated Code Section Offense Description 18 U S C Section 641 Theft of Government Property 18 U S C Section 1343 Wire Fraud 18 U S C Section 1956 h Money Laundering 18 U S C Section 208 Conflict of Interest This criminal complaint is based on these facts See Af davit of Special Agent Tigran Gambaryan attached Approved as to form AUSA Haun EI Continued on the attached sheet Complainant '5 signature Tigran Gambaryan lRS-Criminal investigations Printed name and titie Sworn to before me and signed in my presence 3 7 3 1 1 if 1 If aaw - y Date 03 25 2015 I Judge 5 signature City and state San Francisco CA Hon Maria Elena James U S Magistrate Judge Printed name and title MELINDA HAAG CABN 132612 United States Attorney DAVID R CALLAWAY CABN 121782 Chief Criminal Division HAUN DCBN 484131 WILLIAM FRENTZEN LABN 24421 Assistant United States Attorneys 450 Golden Gate Avenue Box 36055 San Francisco California 94102-3495 Telephone 415 436 7200 FAX 415 436-7234 gov William frentzen@usdoj gov RAYMOND N HULSER MABN 551350 Acting Chief Public Integrity Section RICHARD B EVANS DCBN 441494 Trial Attorney 1400 New York Avenue NW Washington DC 20005 Telephone 202 353-7760 Richard B Evans@usdoj gov Attorneys for United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIAL AGENT TIGRAN GAMBARYAN IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL v COMPLAINT CARL M FORCE IV and FILED UNDER SEAL SHAUN W BRIDGES Defendants I Tigran Gambaryan being rst duly sworn hereby depose and state as follows AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION AND AGENT BACKGROUND The following af davit is made in support of a criminal complaint and arrest warrant for Carl Mark FORCE IV for violations of 18 U S C Section 1343 Wire Fraud 18 U S C Section 641 Theft of Government PrOperty 18 U S C Section 1956 Money Laundering and 18 U S C Section 208 Con ict of Interest and also in support of a criminal complaint and arrest warrant for Shaun W BRIDGES for violations of 18 U S C Section 1343 Wire Fraud and 18 U S C Section 1956 Money Laundering I am a Special Agent with the Criminal Investigation Division of the Internal Revenue Service IRS in the Northern District of California and have been since 201 1 I am currently the group s Cyber Crimes Unit Liaison Prior to that my background was as an auditor for California s Franchise Tax Board where I investigated abusive tax shelters My training and experience includes but is not limited to investigations involving money laundering white collar fraud public corruption organized crime and violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and tax code I have developed a specialty in cyber and digital currency crimes I am involved in an investigation into members of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force to include former Drug Enforcement Administration Agent Carl Mark FORCE IV FORCE and former Secret Service Agent Shaun BRIDGES BRIDGES This is a bicoastal investigation that is based in San Francisco being handled by the US Attorney s Of ce for the Northern District of California and the Public Integrity Section in Washington DC In this investigation I am joined by several co-case agents to include Special Agents and a Staff Operations Specialist from the Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI San Francisco Division s Public Corruption Squad which investigates abuse of public of ce in violation of criminal law to include fraud bribery extortion con icts of interest and embezzlement I am also joined in this investigation by the Department of Justice s Of ce of the Inspector General DOJ OIG and the Department of Homeland Security s Of ce of the Inspector General DHS OIG both of which investigate and prosecute fraud and abuse by federal of cials The facts in this af davit come from my personal observations my training and experience and information obtained from other agents and witnesses This af davit is intended to show merely that AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 2 there is suf cient probable cause for the requested complaint and warrants and does not set forth all of my knowledge about this matter 11 SUMMARY The government had multiple investigations into the Silk Road marketplace an underground black market that allowed vendors and buyers to conduct illegal transactions over the intemet One of these investigations was conducted in the Southern District of New York and the other was conducted out of Baltimore in the District of Maryland Both FORCE and BRIDGES were assigned to the Baltimore investigation and not the New York investigation The two investigations were conducted independently of each other Throughout 2012 and 2013 both FORCE and BRIDGES had signi cant responsibilities related to Baltimore s investigation In this capacity FORCE was the lead undercover agent in communication with DPR the owner administrator and operator of the Silk Road website l BRIDGES was the computer forensics expert on the Baltimore investigation In their capacity as members of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force both FORCE and BRIDGES had signi cant exposure to and developed expertise in the digital currency known as Bitcoin As will be described further herein FORCE and BRIDGES abused their positions as federal agents and engaged in a scheme to defraud a variety of third-parties the public and the government all for their own nancial enrichment With reSpect to former Drug Enforcement Administration DEA Special Agent FORCE the investigation has revealed among other things that a FORCE created certain ctitious personas -- that were not of cially sanctioned -- to communicate with DPR the target of investigation Using one of these personas FORCE sought to extort DPR by seeking monetary payment offering in exchange not to provide the government with certain information if DPR paid $250 000 b FORCE acted outside the scope of his of cial role on the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force and created a ctitious persona named French Maid Operating as French 1 Until October 1 2013 DPR was known to FORCE and the rest of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force only by his online moniker Dread Pirate Roberts or Ulbricht was known on the Silk Road site by the moniker Dread Pirate Roberts DPR and is referred to hereafter interchangeably as and Ulbricht AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 3 Maid FORCE fraudulently represented to DPR certain information concerning French Maid s true identity and offered to sell DPR information about the government s investigation into Silk Road in exchange for approximately $100 000 worth of bitcoin which DPR paid and FORCE deposited into his own personal accounts FORCE stole and converted to his own personal use a sizeable amount of bitcoins that DPR sent to FORCE in of cial undercover capacity and rather than turning those bitcoin over to the government FORCE deposited them into his own personal accounts FORCE engaged in a series of complex transactions between various Bitcoin accounts known as Bitcoin addresses his personal digital currency accounts and his personal bank accounts including a $235 000 wire to an overseas account in Panama all in an effort to launder and conceal the true source of the ill-gotten proceeds FORCE used his of cial position as a DEA agent to illegally run criminal history checks on individuals for the bene t of a third-party digital currency exchange company in which FORCE had personally invested approximately $110 000 worth of bitcoin FORCE functioned as the de facto Chief Compliance Of cer for all the while employed as a DEA agent even allowing himself to be featured in CoinMKT s pitch decks to venture capital investors and allowing himself to be listed as CoinMKT s anti money laundering and or compliance of cer in order to bene t a company in which FORCE had invested FORCE improperly directed to freeze one of its individual customer s accounts containing a large amount of digital currency worth approximately $297 000 even though he lacked a suf cient legal basis on which to do so and FORCE then illegally seized those funds and transferred them into his own personal account and FORCE used his supervisor s signature stamp without authorization on an of cial US Department of Justice subpoena and sent the subpoena to a payments company Venmo directing the company to unfreeze his own personal account which had been previously AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 4 frozen due to certain suspicious activity FORCE then sought to conceal evidence of his improper use of an of cial subpoena by directing the company not to contact the DEA and attempting to destroy copies of the subpoena When the company did not comply FORCE asked another agent on the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force an IRS agent to collaborate with him on seizing that company s bank accounts With respect to former US Secret Service Special Agent BRIDGES the investigation has revealed among other things that a In late January 2013 members of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force to include BRIDGES and FORCE gained access to a Silk Road website administrator account as a result of the arrest of a former Silk Road employee On January 25 2013 the Silk Road website suffered a sizeable theft of bitcoins bitcoins which were moved into Mt Gox a digital currency exchange based in Japan On February 12 2013 BRIDGES formed and registered a personal limited liability company called Quantum International Investments Quantum and on February 22 2013 BRIDGES opened an account at Fidelity Investments Fidelity in the name of Quantum According to records obtained from Fidelity BRIDGES funded his Quantum Fidelity account exclusively with wire deposits from Mt Gox in Japan Speci cally between March 6 2013 through May 7 2013 Quantum Fidelity account in the United States received nine wire transfers from Mt Gox totaling approximately $820 000 Despite having personally bene tted in the amount of $820 000 from a Mt Gox account and receiving a large wire on May 7 2013 from Mt Gox just two days later on May 9 2013 BRIDGES served as the af ant on a multi-million dollar seizure warrant for Mt Gox and its owner s bank accounts and Upon learning of the government s criminal investigation into the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force based in the Northern District of California and following an interview by the FBI as part of the criminal investigation BRIDGES transferred over $250 000 out of AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT his Quantum Fidelity account via wire transfers into another bank account held by himself and a third-party Because this af davit is for the limited purpose of establishing probable cause for the crimes proposed to be charged at the present time it does not include certain additional facts known to me and the government s investigation continues RELEVANT STATUTES Based on my training and experience and the facts as set forth in this af davit there is probable cause to believe that FORCE has committed violations of law to include Title 18 United States Code Section 1343 Wire Fraud Title 18 United States Code Section 641 Theft of Government Property Title 18 United States Code Section 1956 Money Laundering and Title 18 United States Code Section 208 Con ict of Interest There is also probable cause to believe that BRIDGES has committed violations of law to include Title 18 United States Code Section 1343 Wire Fraud and Title 18 United States Code Section 1956 Money Laundering Title 18 U S C 641 prohibits embezzling stealing or converting any property belonging to the United States worth more than $1 000 The essential elements of this offense are 1 the defendant knowingly embezzled stole or converted to the defendant s use or the use of another the money or property of value with the intention of depriving the owner of the use or benefit of the money or property 2 the money or property belonged to the United States and 3 the value of the money or property was more than $1 000 See Ninth Circuit Instruction 8 39 Title 18 U S C 1343 prohibits wire fraud The essential elements of this offense are 1 the defendant knowingly participated in devised or intended to devise a scheme or plan to defraud or a scheme or plan for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses representations or promises 2 the statements made or facts omitted as part of the scheme were material that is they had a natural tendency to influence or were capable of in uencing a person to part with money or property 3 the defendant acted with the intent to defraud that is the intent to deceive or cheat and 4 the defendant used or caused to be used a wire communication to carry out or attempt to carry out an essential part of the scheme gee Ninth Circuit Instruction 8 124 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT IxTitle 18 U S C 1956 a 1 B i prohibits the laundering of proceeds from speci ed unlawful activity SUA The essential elements are 1 the defendant conducted or intended to conduct a nancial transaction involving property that represented the proceeds of speci ed unlawful activity 2 the defendant knew that the property represented the proceeds of speci ed unlawful activity 3 the defendant knew the transaction was designed in whole or in part to conceal or disguise the nature location source ownership or control of the proceeds of the speci ed unlawful activity and 4 the defendant did something that was a substantial step toward committing the crime See Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instruction 8 147 The money laundering statute speci cally identi es both 1343 wire fraud and 641 theft of government property as speci ed unlawful activity Title 18 U S C 208 prohibits federal employees from taking certain acts affecting a personal nancial interest Although there is no Ninth Circuit model instruction for this statute caselaw establishes that the essential elements are 1 the defendant was an of cer or employee of the Executive Branch of the United States 2 the defendant participated personally and substantially as a government employee through decision approval disapproval recommendation rendering of advice investigation or otherwise in a matter and 3 the defendant knew that he had a nancial interest in the particular matter in which he was participating IV BACKGROUND FORCE was employed as a DEA Special Agent for approximately 15 years He began his career with the DEA in September 1999 and served in Denver Puerto Rico and Baltimore FORCE resigned on May 4 2014 shortly after law enforcement began the current investigation FORCE received approximately $150 000 in annual salary from the DEA Based on my investigation during the relevant timeframe of 2012 into 2014 his wife was a homemaker and the household had no signi cant outside income FORCE used one of his personal bank accounts to receive several large international and domestic wire and Automated Clearing House ACH transfers throughout the latter half of 2013 and rst half of 2014 1 have reviewed bank records and two personal checking accounts in name reveal incoming deposits totaling at least approximately $757 000 for the roughly year AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT long period beginning April 2013 through May 2014 2 This does not include amounts deposited from May 2014 onward I have also learned through my investigation that during this timeframe FORCE paid off his mortgage a government thrift savings plan loan and wrote several very large checks for tens of thousands of dollars In 2014 FORCE made investments in real properties in businesses and wired hundreds of thousands of dollars into an overseas account From 2013 through the present FORCE has held numerous accounts in his own name and with his own personal identifiers3 at a variety ofdigital currency exchanges around the world including in the Northern District of California Moreover in April 2014 FORCE established a company called Engedi LLC According to documents led with the Maryland Secretary of State Engedi purpose is to speculate and invest in Bitcoin Like FORCE BRIDGES was a member of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force Until his abrupt resignation on March 18 2015 after learning he was a subject of this investigation BRIDGES was employed as a US Secret Service Special Agent for approximately six years He began his career with in October 2009 and served in its Baltimore Field Of ce After the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force ended BRIDGES remained part of the Electronic Crimes Task Force in Maryland In this role he served as the affiant on numerous seizure warrants On January 25 2013 the Silk Road website suffered a sizeable theft of Bitcoin a theft with which BRIDGES was associated For reasons discussed below I believe the proceeds of this theft were transferred to the Mt Gox exchange in Japan On February 12 2013 not long after the Silk Road thefts occurred BRIDGES formed a company called Quantum International Investments LLC Quantum On February 22 2013 BRIDGES established a personal investment account at Fidelity Investments Fidelity in the name of Quantum BRIDGES used that Fidelity account to receive several large international wire transfers from Japan speci cally from Mt Gox throughout the March through May 2013 timeframe There were nine 2 Approximately $330 000 was deposited in 2013 and approximately $427 000 was deposited in 2014 This does not include the deposits made after this period that are discussed further below 3 These personal accounts use home address and link to his personal bank and email account information AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT Ixwire transfers from Mt Gox to Quantum Fidelity account and each was just under $100 000 This account was funded exclusively with deposits from Mt Gox Just two days after receiving his last Mt Gox wire on May 7 2013 BRIDGES served in his official capacity as the afflant on a May 9 2013 seizure warrant where he seized over $2 1 million from Mt Gox under the theory Mt Gox was operating in violation of 18 U S C Section 1960 which prohibits the operation of an unregistered money service business After learning of this investigation into the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force and after being interviewed by federal law enforcement in the summer of 2014 BRIDGES transferred via two separate interstate wires over $250 000 from his Quantum Fidelity account into an account at another bank that was held in his own name and in the name of a third-party with whom BRIDGES has a personal relationship V BITCOIN BACKGROUND Bitcoin4 is a form of decentralized convertible virtual currency that exists through the use of an online decentralized ledger system While Bitcoin mainly exists as an internet based form of currency it is possible to print out the necessary information and exchange Bitcoin via physical medium The currency is not issued by any government bank or company but rather is generated and controlled through computer software operating via a decentralized network To acquire bitcoins a typical user will purchase them from a Bitcoin seller or exchanger It is also possible to mine bitcoin by verifying other users transactions Bitcoin is just one form of digital currency and there are a signi cant number of other varieties of digital currency Bitcoin exchangers typically accept payments of at currency currency which derives its value from government regulation or law or other convertible virtual currencies in order to obtain bitcoins When a user wishes to purchase bitcoins from an exchanger the user will typically send payment in the form of at or other convertible virtual currency to an exchanger usually via wire or ACH for the correSponding number of bitcoins based on a uctuating exchange rate The exchanger often for a 4 Since Bitcoin is both a currency and a protocol capitalization differs Accepted practice is to use Bitcoin singular with an upper case letter B to label the protocol software and community and bitcoin or bitcoins with a lower case b to label units of the currency and that practice is adopted here AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 9 ixcommission will then typically attempt to broker the purchase with another user of the exchange that is trying to sell bitcoins or in some instances will act as the seller itself If the exchanger can place a buyer with a seller then the transaction can be completed When a user acquires bitcoins they are sent to the user s Bitcoin address This is somewhat analogous to a bank account number _ which is comprised of a case sensitive string of letters and numbers amounting to a total of26 to 35 characters The user can then conduct transactions with other Bitcoin users by transferring bitcoins to their Bitcoin addresses via the internet Little to no personally identi able information about the payer or payee is transmitted in a Bitcoin transaction Bitcoin transactions occur using a public key and a private key A public key is used to receive bitcoins and a private key is used to allow withdrawals from a Bitcoin address Only the Bitcoin address of the receiving party and the sender s private key are needed to complete the transaction which by themselves rarely re ect any identifying information All Bitcoin transactions are recorded on what is known as the block chain This is essentially a distributed public ledger that keeps track of all Bitcoin transactions incoming and outgoing and updates approximately six times per hour The block chain records every Bitcoin address that has ever received a bitcoin and maintains records of every transaction and all the known balances for each Bitcoin address Digital currencies including Bitcoin have many known legitimate uses However much like cash bitcoins can be used to facilitate illicit transactions and to launder criminal proceeds given the ease with which they can be used to move money anonymously As is demonstrated herein however in some circumstances bitcoin payments may be traced to accounts at traditional nancial institutions using the block chain VI SILK ROAD BACKGROUND The Silk Road website was established in early 2011 and operated until on or about October 2 2013 when it was seized by law enforcement The illegal nature of the commerce hosted on Silk Road was readily apparent to anyone visiting the site The vast majority of the goods for sale consisted of illegal drugs of nearly every variety openly advertised on the site as such and prominently visible on the home page The only form of payment accepted on Silk Road was Bitcoin AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT IO Silk Road was only accessible through the TOR network a special network on the internet designed to conceal the true IP addresses of the computers on the network and thereby the identities of the network s users TOR stands for The Onion Router Every Silk Road user had at least one Bitcoin address associated with the user s Silk Road account where deposits to the account could be sent To make purchases on the site the user rst had to obtain Bitcoin for example from an exchanger and have them sent to the bitcoin deposit address associated with the user s Silk Road account After thus funding the account the user could make purchases from Silk Road vendors A federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of New York indicted Ross William Ulbricht also known as as being the creator of Silk Road and engaging in a drug conspiracy in violation of 21 U S C Section 846 among other charges The matter proceeded to a multi-week trial in January 2015 before US District Judge Katherine B Forrest Evidence at that trial and other evidence of which I am aware establishes that from late 2012 through his arrest on October 1 2013 Ulbricht DPR was residing in and ran the Silk Road from San Francisco On or about February 4 2015 a federal jury sitting in the Southern District of New York convicted Ulbricht of all counts with which he was charged Sentencing is set for May 15 2015 ADDITIONAL PARAGRAPH PROVIDED TO COURT IN SEPARATE UNDER SEAL FILING IS REDACTED HERE Aside from the New York case on October 1 2013 the District of Maryland charged Ulbricht with murder-for-hire and related drug-conspiracy charges 5 It is the District ofMaryland s investigation and case in which FORCE and BRIDGES were involved VII FORCE PROBABLE CAUSE Of cial Undercover Role On Baltimore s Silk Road Task Force As described above FORCE BRIDGES and other law enforcement agents from the Department of Homeland Security Internal Revenue Service and the US Postal Inspection Service 6 worked on a 5 The District of Maryland had previously charged John Doe a k a Dread Pirate Roberts with these charges on or about May 1 2013 at which time the District of Maryland was unsure of the true identity of DPR The District of Maryland subsequently charged Ulbricht with these offenses after an IRS Special Agent on the Southern District of New York s investigation identi ed DPR as Ulbricht 6 The Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms ATF was part of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force early on but their involvement did not last long AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT Il task force out of Baltimore dedicated to identifying and apprehending DPR later determined to be Ross Ulbricht As part of his of cial role in the Baltimore Silk Road investigation FORCE communicated with DPR using an undercover identity hereafter referred to as Nob Nob FORCE and DPR communicated throughout 2012 and 2013 using a variety of methods of communication including on a private messaging system on the Silk Road website and on chat programs that operated over the TOR network Their communications reveal that DPR believed Nob to be a drug smuggler operating in the United States with connections to criminal organizations throughout the world In reality of course Nob was FORCE an undercover DEA agent Many but not all of their communications were as discussed further below Some portion of the communications between DPR and Nob FORCE are memorialized in of cial case le preserved in what are known as DEA 65 which are of cial reports of the investigation Some of the communications are also preserved on of cial computers However not all of the communications between DPR and Nob FORCE were memorialized At the time of Ulbricht s arrest law enforcement seized a laptop computer from Ulbricht s person This computer has been forensically analyzed It too contained evidence of communications between DPR and Nob FORCE It also contained certain communications between DPR and FORCE that FORCE did memorialize in his of cial reports or as part of his of cial case le Ulbricht s computer also contained a handful of les that appear to be Ulbricht s notes to himself One such le is named counterintel which your af ant believes stands for Law Enforcement Counterintelligence and contains information that DPR was receiving from purported inside law enforcement sources I have reviewed these les and believe that they contain information that came from a person or persons inside law enforcement in part because of their substance and in part because of their use of certain terminology and acronyms that are not widely known by the public AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 12 Prior to his arrest DPR was known to have been hiding his true identity and location from law enforcement so information concerning the government s investigation was material and valuable to him I have reviewed many of the communications between DPR and Nob FORCE that are available At some point Nob FORCE and DPR began certain of these communications using what is known as PGP PGP stands for pretty good privacy and is an algorithm that allows its users to send conversations through messaging or chat services Much like the way bitcoins are controlled PGP too uses a system of public keys and private keys With PGP a public key is used to a message for a speci c user to read and a private key is used by the recipient to the message In addition to needing a private key to a message a user must also possess a unique password that was established at the time of creation to or sign a message A review of of cial case le does not contain any of the private PGP keys or passwords needed to communications with DPR Nor did FORCE provide these private PGP keys to the prosecutor on the Baltimore case or to those in his chain of-command Instead FORCE appears to have been the only individual to have possessed the private PGP keys and passwords needed to unlock his communication with DPR This is notable because as a law enforcement agent I know that one of the chief concerns in working an investigation and building evidence is the ability to obtain decipherable admissible evidence for use in later proceedings Despite his involvement in the Baltimore Silk Road investigation and knowledge that other law enforcement would be unable to read communications without the private PGP keys FORCE acting as Nob speci cally instructed DPR to use PGP to messages relating to the investigation While this request may have enhanced Nob s credibility to DPR as a criminal thereby furthering his cover it would have made it dif cult for FORCE to document the communications communications that would be of use to law enforcement making a case against DPR at a later date Even if messages to DPR would make Nob more credible the communications should have been documented in deciphered form and memorialized in the case le AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT l3 have conferred with other law enforcement agents who conduct online undercover operations and believe the failure to preserve the private PGP keys while simultaneously directing a target to use PGP to messages makes little sense in the context of a law enforcement investigation particularly taking into account that this task force involved multiple law enforcement officers all of whom might require access to the evidence FORCE gathered in his dealings with DPR In the event FORCE were to lose the PGP private keys or that something were to happen to FORCE any evidence contained in the PGP format would effectively be lost and unusable without the private key apparent failure to document the private PGP keys for his communications with DPR anywhere in his case le or to provide them to others at the DEA or to the prosecutor leads me to believe he did not want anyone other than himself FORCE to be able to certain of those communications and that as a result he sought deliberately to undermine the integrity of the ongoing Baltimore Silk Road Task Force investigation Although in the beginning of his time communicating with DPR FORCE as Nob occasionally provided certain communications to others on the Task Force including the prosecutor with whom he was working FORCE did not provide all communications in form This was despite the fact that the prosecutor with whom FORCE was working repeatedly emphasized the need for FORCE to provide all communications In fact toward the end of the timeframe in which Nob FORCE was in relatively heavy communication with DPR FORCE increasingly was not providing the versions of their communication Theft of 525 Bitcoins Coming from Ulbricht a k a In his communications with DPR Nob FORCE created the ction that Nob had sensitive information that he would provide to DPR often in exchange for payment including law enforcement sensitive information One of the cover stories that Nob FORCE created with DPR was that Nob had access to a corrupt government employee ctionally named Kevin Ironically Kevin was supposed to be a corrupt Department of Justice case agent on the government s Silk Road investigation and simultaneously on Nob s payroll who would feed Nob information about law enforcement s AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT l4 investigation into the Silk Road FORCE memorialized this cover story concerning Kevin in a DEA 6 dated August 1 2013 the August DEA DPR subsequently paid Nob FORCE in bitcoins on at least two occasions One payment was in June 2013 for 400 bitcoins7 for fraudulent identi cation documents that Nob was supposed to provide to DPR A second payment was in August 2013 for 525 bitcoins for Kevin s inside law enforcement information At the time of the payments 400 bitcoins would have been worth approximately $40 000 and 525 bitcoins would have been worth approximately $50 000 s Both the June 400 bitcoin payment and the August 525 bitcoin payment became of cial government property once DPR made the payments they were received as part of of cial undercover role from the target of a federal investigation and therefore became undercover proceeds As is described further below rather than properly documenting these payments and safeguarding them in a government account FORCE took custody of the payments and deposited the bulk of the 400 bitcoin payment and all of the 525 bitcoin payment into his own personal account Records received from a digital currency exchange CampBX reveal that FORCE maintained a personal account there that was linked directly to two additional personal accounts belonging to FORCE 1 account at another digital currency exchange Bitstamp and 2 account at a payments processing account Dwolla neither of which were government or of cial accounts g In the August DEA 6 FORCE memorialized the fact that he acting as Nob sent a PGP- communication to DPR According to the August DEA 6 Nob FORCE advised DPR that 7 The 400 bitcoin payment was actually an 800 bitcoin payment but Nob FORCE refunded DPR 400 bitcoins because the deal for the fraudulent identi cation documents allegedly fell through 8 These are very conservative estimates and the actual loss amount is likely greater than these amounts FORCE himself valued the 400 bitcoin payment as being equal to $76 800 on October 22 2013 and not $40 000 as described here The reason for the difference concerns the uctuating value of bitcoin during this timeframe The value of bitcoin at the time of the June 2013 payment was approximately $100 per bitcoin yielding the $40 000 approximation provided here However the value at the time of own valuation of the 400 bitcoin payment in October 2013 was approximately $192 per bitcoin It should also be noted that during the time that FORCE was liquidating bitcoins through his own personal accounts the value of bitcoin uctuated dramatically ranging from less than $300 per bitcoin to over $1100 per bitcoin 9 FORCE maintained a separate account at Dwolla in the name of his of cial undercover identity In contrast personal account at Dwolla was in his own name and established using his own personal identifiers such as Social Security number home address personal email and date of birth AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 15 Kevin wanted a donation of bitcoins from DPR the inference being that the information on the Silk Road investigation is valuable The August DEA 6 further speci es that Special Agent FORCE provided a Bitcoin wallet address for DPR to deposit the Bitcoin payment for Kevin s information However FORCE made an Agent s Note at the bottom of the August DEA 6 explicitly stating that DPR never made the payment writing NOTE DPR made no such payment emphasis added The August DEA 6 is also notable for what information it does not contain It does not include the actual Bitcoin public address that Nob FORCE provided to DPR to receive payment for Kevin s information Including this information would have allowed other law enforcement agents to trace any payment if made Nor does the August DEA 6 list or document the POP password that would be subsequently needed to decipher the communication between DPR and Nob FORCE concerning Kevin s information or the information surrounding the payment for that information However certain communications between Nob FORCE and DPR were maintained on the server that hosted the Silk Road website which the FBI imaged as part of the Southern District of New York investigation I have obtained and reviewed a copy of that server and it contains the communications between Nob FORCE and DPR including certain communications that FORCE does not appear to have memorialized in the of cial case le The server contains a chain of messages between DPR and Nob FORCE from July 31 2013 through August 4 2013 With the exception of one message DPR authored the messages in the chain are completely That sole message in this chain is from DPR to Nob FORCE It is dated August 4 2013 and concerns a payment DPR made for Kevin s information Speci cally DPR wrote could not your second message got an error I could the rst and have sent the 525 as reguested Please keep me posted and you have my word that no one else knows anything about this I m sorry I didn t know how much to send before I was afraid of offending if I sent too little and looking foolish if I sent too much I hope I didn t make things too difficult for you emphasis added Within approximately two hours of DPR sending the message described above Nob FORCE AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 16 responded to DPR with an message but containing the subject line use As noted PGP stands for Pretty Good Privacy an mechanism In other words FORCE was directing DPR to his messages Following the message containing the subject line were a series of additional back and forth PGP messages between Nob FORCE and DPR I know from other law enforcement agents who conduct undercover operations on TOR and black market sites that there is little reason to direct a target who is using clear communication to instead use communication and no reason to fail to document a mechanism in the case le or share it with other agents management or the prosecutor Again FORCE did not memorialize the PGP private key that could be used to decipher the July 31-August 4 2013 communication chain between himself and DPR anywhere in his case le or provide it to anyone else at the DEA or to the prosecutor with whom he was working Furthermore the last mention of payment for Kevin s information in of cial DEA case le is the August DEA 6 in which FORCE speci cally stated that no payment was ever received Nor are there any subsequent DEA 6s correcting or amending this In fact a review of of cial case le reveals that FORCE never documented having received a 525 Bitcoin payment from DPR as August 4 2013 communication to Nob FORCE states had occurred I believe that FORCE acting as Nob instructed DPR to use PGP in part to conceal the fact that DPR actually had made a 525 bitcoin payment to Nob FORCE that FORCE was not detailing in his of cial law enforcement reports This conclusion is bolstered by the fact that in the August DEA 6 FORCE took care to explicitly note the fact in the NOTE DPR made no such payment and there is no subsequent DEA 6 in which FORCE states that DPR did transmit a 525 bitcoin payment It is further bolstered by the fact that FORCE does not appear to have memorialized the PGP keys for his communications with DPR anywhere in the of cial case le Finally when DPR mentioned the 525 bitcoin payment in the August 4 communication the rst response FORCE acting as Nob gave was use Notably by late July 2013 the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force had been made aware that the FBI was seeking to obtain an image of the Silk Road server and therefore FORCE may have had reason AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT l7 fear that any communications between himself and DPR would be accessible to the FBI in the event the FBI was successful in imaging the server Records obtained from personal digital currency account at a digital currency exchange company CampBX reveal that on September 27 2013 FORCE deposited the precise amount of525 bitcoins into his own personal account at CampBX 10 I have performed an analysis of the block chain as it concerns the 525 bitcoin deposit to personal CampBX account The analysis reveals that the 525 bitcoins FORCE received into his own personal CampBX account was directly linked through a series of transactions to the 525 bitcoin payment that DPR made on August 4 2013 i e the same day DPR communicated to Nob FORCE that he had sent the 525 BTC as requested Records from the Silk Road servers establish that this 525 bitcoin payment originated from Silk Road account on August 4 2013 Speci cally the 525 bitcoin payment was split into four smaller payments and made in the following manner a On August 4 2013 at 22 05 UTC 21 payment of 203 bitcoins b On August 4 2013 at 22 05 UTC a payment of 134 bitcoins c On August 4 2013 at 22 05 UTC a payment of61 bitcoins d On August 4 2013 at 22 01 UTC a payment of 127 bitcoins The 525 bitcoin payment went from four addresses and ultimately landed in a single pass- through account on September 1 2013 The 525 bitcoin remained in the pass-through account from September 1 2013 until September 27 2013 when they were transferred into personal account at CampBX These transactions are depicted on Trace of 525 Bitcoin Payment attached as Exhibit B Notably FORCE treated June 400 bitcoin payment differently from the way he treated the August 525 bitcoin payment To be sure FORCE wrongfully deposited substantial portions of both 0 The September 27 2013 date has signi cance because email records 1 have reviewed indicate that at the latest on September 27 2013 FORCE learned that DPR was about to be apprehended as part of the separate New York investigation into the Silk Road In response to learning this information FORCE wrote to the prosecutor with whom he was working inquiring as to the true name and identifying information of DPR To my knowledge FORCE was not provided with that information on September 27 2013 in response to his inquiry AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 18 payments into his own personal account at CampBX and later transferred them to another of his personal accounts at Bitstamp another digital currency exchange where FORCE maintained a personal account However FORCE memorialized the 400 bitcoin payment in a DEA 6 albeit many months after the June 400 bitcoin payment was made and in January 2014 attempted to put together a seizure warrant for that 400 bitcoin paymentthis for the 525 bitcoin payment And as part of the process of putting together a seizure warrant for the 400 bitcoin payment the federal prosecutor with whom FORCE was working emailed FORCE on January 16 2014 and asked him a series of questions including where the 400 bitcoins physically were FORCE replied in an email later that day that the 400 bitcoins were at the Based on my review of records and an analysis of the block chain this was not true And with respect to the S25 bitcoins FORCE never made any attempt to memorialize the payment or to prepare a seizure warrant The federal prosecutor with whom FORCE was working was unaware of any 525 bitcoin payment ever having been made as were superiors at the DEA As part of this investigation a federal search warrant was issued to search various personal email facilities belonging to FORCE One such email account contained what appears to be a note to himself saved in a drafts folder This note references two transfers of bitcoin payments from DPR one made in June July 2013 for the fraudulent UK identification and one made on August 4 2013 the same date that DPR transferred 525 bitcoins to Nob FORCE Exhibit attached Draft Note In other words own saved email note indicates there was a payment from DPR on August 4 2013 1 The note also appears to attempt to justify conduct noting that the government actually made money during the time FORCE retained the payments presumably given the uctuating value of Bitcoin At the time of the 525 bitcoin payment and during the time of the communications between Nob FORCE and DPR I have con rmed via internet service provider records and a variety of other means that DPR Ross Ulbricht was physically located in San Francisco in the Northern District of California For reasons that are currently unknown to me FORCE characterized the August 4 2013 payment as being for 200 bitcoins However as demonstrated above the August 4 2013 payment was for 525 bitcoins AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT l9 L4Based on the fact that DPR paid 525 bitcoins to Nob FORCE in of cial government capacity as an undercover agent on Baltimore s Silk Road case and based on the fact that the 525 bitcoins ultimately ended up in personal account with CampBX there is probable cause to believe that FORCE embezzled converted 0r stole government property in violation of 18 U S C Section 641 Given that these bitcoins went through several different accounts often for short periods of time as depicted in Exhibit B and sat idle in a pass-through account from September 1 2013 through September 27 2013 before making their way to personal account with CampBX on September 27 2013 there is also probable cause to believe that FORCE was attempting to conceal the source of the true source of the proceeds in violatiOn of 18 U S C Section 1956 Fraud as French Maid The only of cially-sanctioned undercover identity for FORCE to communicate with DPR was as Nob Nob was the persona that was discussed in of cial reports Nob was also the persona of which others in chain-of-command and the federal prosecutor on the Baltimore Silk Road case were aware When DPR was arrested in San Francisco he was caught literally in the act of running the Silk Road on a laptop computer The FBI seized and forensically examined that laptOp and its contents were part of the government s proof at trial against Ulbricht As discussed above Ulbricht s laptop contained a text document entitled counterintel a record of sorts that he maintained about information he was receiving from apparent law enforcement insiders purporting to have knowledge about the government s investigation into the Silk Road The le appears to contain cut and pasted sections of what the insiders were relaying to him through online chats or private messages One such insider used the moniker French Maid Notes in a file from Ulbricht s computer indicate that he paid French Maid approximately $100 000 worth of bitcoin in exchange for a name that he was told Mark Karpeles had provided to law enforcement Mark Karpeles was at the time the CEO of the now-defunct Mt Gox digital currency exchange The Baltimore Silk Road Task Force was attempting to arrange an interview of Karpeles during the July to August 2013 timeframe in order to obtain any information Karpeles might have had concerning the Operator of Silk Road AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 20 Speci cally in a text document recovered from Ulbricht s computer titled log there is an entry dated September 13 2013 in which Ulbricht wrote French Maid claims that mark karpeles has given my name to DHLS sic I offered him for the name Days later i2 Ulbricht wrote paid French Maid for the name given to DHLS by karpeles Our investigation has revealed that there is probable cause to believe that FORCE was French Maid a source that Ulbricht paid for inside information I have reviewed private messages between French Maid FORCE and DPR obtained from the Silk Road server imaged by the FBI The messages span from August 26 2013 through September 14 2013 The bulk of the messages are with PGP keys but some early messages are not In the rst message in this thread dated August 26 2013 French Maid wrote to DPR have received important information that you need to know asap Please provide me with your public key for PGP Emphasis added Just four hours later French Maid sent a follow-up message to DPR with the subject line Whoops and a message stating am sorry about that My name is Carla Sophia and I have many boyfriends and girlfriends on the market place DPR will want to hear what I have to say xoxoxo Emphasis added What follow are a series of back and forth messages between DPR and French Maid Of particular note there are several messages between DPR and French Maid on September 13 2013 with French Maid including the subject line Hope you like It is unclear whether French Maid ever provided DPR with any name In the log le recovered from Ulbricht s computer after the entry stating that he had paid French maid $100k for the name given to DHLS by karpeles there is an entry stating He hasn t replied for 4 days There is no further entry in the log le regarding French Maid The fact that the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force was attempting to arrange an interview with Karpeles was not widely known in law enforcement circles In other words French Maid could not have been just anyone out of the universe of law enforcement It had to have been someone who knew 12 The entry gives only the date range of September 11-September 18 and does not provide an exact date AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 21 about Baltimore s attempt to arrange an interview with Karpeles 13 Based on emails I have reviewed FORCE was one ofa small group of individuals that knew of those discussions Additional pieces ofcircumstantial evidence prove that FORCE is French Maid Both French Maid and FORCE Operating as Nob used the exact same brand of PGP software a free brand called There are different brands of PGP software so it is noteworthy that both FORCE operating as and French Maid used the same brand Not only did FORCE and French Maid both use the same brand of PGP software they also both used the same outdated version of that software 1 4 12 Version 1 4 12 was released on January 2012 and was replaced with a new version by December 2012 and was one of several versions of software H As such both French Maid and FORCE as Nob were using a specific older version of the software and neither of them replaced it with the other free versions of that came out thereafter I I know based on conversations with another federal agent who is involved in undercover investigations that among TOR users and consumers of PGP software v1 4 12 version was somewhat outdated by late August 2013 when French Maid appeared in communication with DPR for the rst time This is not akin for example to two people using the same model of mobile phone but both having software that is out of date Rather the outdated version that both French Maid and FORCE as Nob used is more 'of a signature given the greater number of versions available There are also additional similarities between Nob s and French Maid s PGP patterns Both Nob and French Maid left certain default settings on their PGP software For one thing both French Maid and FORCE Nob left a tag that appeared on every message authored from their PGP key revealing the brand and version of PGP software they were using This is akin to for example leaving the phrase sent from my iPhone on the bottom of one s emails but with greater detail it would be akin to leaving a phrase like sent from my iPhone 6 108 Leaving this tag on typically reveals that one is dealing with a fairly inexperienced user of PGP because someone that regularly uses PGP to communicate would normally have changed their settings to omit this tag After My understanding is that that the interview with Karpeles never materialized 4 investigation into Silk Road began in approximately February 2012 and he began using PGP as Nob sometime by approximately April 2012 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 22 all the entire point behind PGP software is anonymity so if a user leaves the brand version bit and release date of software on a message this is revealing something about the sender and undermines the goal of remaining 100% anonymous One of the rst things many PGP forums or regular users of PGP software instruct is that a user disable this feature Moreover PGP offers choices of 1024 2048 3072 or 4096 bit keys with the higher keys giving greater protection Many of the regular PGP users that were active on the Silk Road chose the 4096 bit keys because of the additional protection the larger key provided Here both FORCE as Nob and French Maid used the 2048 bit default key In addition to the PGP similarities additional evidence that FORCE is French Maid is that the 770 bitcoin payment DPR made to French Maid worth approximately $98 000 at the time ended up in own personal digital currency account at CampBX Specifically Silk Road server data reveals that DPR made a payment on September 15 2013 for 770 bitcoins As noted this is the same time frame when Ulbricht wrote in his journal that he had paid French Maid for the name that K arpeles provided to An analysis of the block chain reveals that the 770 bitcoin payment was broken up into four separate bitcoin addresses and funneled through a series of pass-through accounts in September 2013 Between September 23 2013 and September 29 2013 those four addresses all came together to deposit 770 bitcoins in personal account at CampBX For a detailed analysis of these complex transactions see attached Exhibit Trace and Analysis of DPR September 2013 Payment to French Maid Records obtained from CampBX demonstrate that this was an account held in personal capacity Moreover throughout November 2013 a substantial portion at least 600 bitcoins of the bitcoins in CampBX account moved to personal account at Bitstamp a global digital currency exchange Again here records obtained from Bitstamp demonstrate that FORCE used his personal identi ers home address date of birth personal bank account and personal email address in connection with his Bitstamp account As is discussed further below FORCE subsequently liquidated hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bitcoin from this Bitstamp account by having the proceeds wired into his personal checking account AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 23 IxFrom having reviewed the entries from the log le on Ulbricht s computer and the portion of the French Maid and DPR messages I believe that statement to DPR that he was Carla Sophia a user on the market place with many girlfriends and boyfriends and omission of his true identity was a material misrepresentation I believe this information in uenced or was capable of in uencing DPR whether to part with property in this case 770 bitcoins had DPR known that he was not communicating with a female named Carla Sophia but instead a male named Carl FORCE who was in fact a federal agent When DPR made the 770 bitcoin payment and when the communications between French Maid FORCE and DPR occurred I have con rmed via internet service provider records and a variety of other means that DPR Ulbricht was physically located in San Francisco in the Northern District of California Based on the fact FORCE fraudulently told DPR via the use of interstate wires that he was Carla Sophia and that this fact was material and given that on that basis DPR paid 770 bitcoins to French Maid for information and that personal accounts received 770 bitcoins from DPR during the same September 2013 timeframe there is probable cause to believe that FORCE committed wire fraud in violation of 18 U S C Section 1343 Given that for example 194 bitcoins of this 770 payment went through several different accounts as depicted in Exhibit E from September 15 2013 through September 22 2013 before making its way to personal account with CampBX on September 23 2013 there is also probable cause to believe that FORCE was attempting to conceal the true source of the proceeds in violation of 18 U S C Section 1956 Extortion of DPR As Death From Above From reviewing one of of cial reports dated November 12 2012 I know that around that time FORCE obtained information from Homeland Security Investigations HSI about an individual then being considered as a possible suspect for DPR The individual was named actual name omitted here for con dentiality Due to its law-enforcement sensitive nature FORCE was not permitted to share this information with individuals outside the government On or about April 1 2013 FORCE created a ctitious persona on the Silk Road website named Death from Above FORCE using the Death from Above moniker solicited a $250 000 payment from DPR and provided DPR the AA name and personal identifying details Specifically on April 1 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 24 Ix2013 Death from Above wrote DPR a message on the Silk Road server stating know that you had something to do with disappearance and death Just wanted to let you know that I m coming for you Tuque You are a dead man Don t think you can elude me De Oppresso Liber 5 On April 6 2013 DPR replied don t know who you are or what your problem is but let me tell you one thing I ve been busting my ass every god damn day for over two years to make this place what it is I keep my head down I don t get involved with the drama somehow people still turn up at my doorstep I ve been hacked I ve had threats made against the site and now thanks to you I ve had threats made against my life I know I am doing a good thing running this site Your threats and all of the other aren t going to deter me stop messaging me and go nd something else to do Later that day Death From Above FORCE replied to DPR this time dropping a reference to name stating It s not that easy I m legit Green Beret Friend of I have access to les that FBI DEA AFP SOCA would kill for In fact that is what I do kill The only thing that I do Don t worry has no interest in you and your little website North Korea and Iran are a lot more important In fact as far as the Army and Navy are concerned you are a nobody Petty drug dealer But was somebody So tell me where he is and we will be done with this On April 10 2013 Death from Above FORCE wrote to DPR again this time giving DPR details concerning AA including full name date of birth citizenship address and other personal identifying details DPR stated Is that enough to get your attention After watching you there is no way you could have killed But I think you had something to do withit So $250 000 in US cash bank transfer and I won t give your identity to law enforcement Consider it punitive damages Death From Above This payment appears to have never materialized apparently because DPR did not believe Death From Above s information in April 2013 Ulbricht wrote in the log le found on his laptop 5 The entire series of messages that Death From Above sent to DPR is not included here for brevity The reference to CO actual name omitted here for con dentiality was a reference to an employee of DPR whom DPR had sought to have murdered in January 2013 as explained further below AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25 that he was being blackmailed again Someone says they have my ID but hasn t proven it Then on April 1 1 2013 Ulbricht wrote guy blackmailing me who says he has my ID is bogus There appears to be no mention of Death From Above anywhere in of cial DEA 6 reports However case le contains several DVDs of video taken with of cial DEA laptop with a screen-recording program that shows certain communications with DPR At some point in that several hours worth of video footage there is a clip of a message being typed on the Silk Road using the Death From Above account A screenshot from that video is attached as Exhibit A Therefore I believe FORCE was Death From Above Death From Above was not known to superiors at the DEA or the prosecutor assigned to the investigation and FORCE was not authorized to disclose information concerning persons under investigation to anyone outside the investigative team including of course disclosing information to the target himself as part of an unsanctioned extortion effort acting as Death From Above demonstrates that FORCE had a history of 1 creating fictitious personas that he did not memorialize in his of cial reports or apprise his superiors at the DEA or the prosecutor of 2 soliciting payments from and 3 providing law-enforcement sensitive information to outside individuals when the disclosure of such information was not authorized and not memorialized in any official report Con ict of Interest with is a California based digital currency exchange company that supports trading between Bitcoin and other I have reviewed a number of emails between FORCE and personnel including its CEO and Co-Founder These communications demonstrate that FORCE had a two-fold relationship with he was both a major investor as well as its de facto compliance officer all while he was employed as a full-time DEA agent who was investigating digital currency users and providers According to the emails in November 2013 FORCE invested approximately $110 000 worth of bitcoin in in two installments First on or about November 8 2013 FORCE invested approximately $10 000 worth of bitcoin in Second on or about November 25 2013 FORCE invested approximately $100 000 more worth of bitcoin in According to AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 26 ix Lathe amount of investment made him one of the top four investors in its rst seed round of fundraising In addition to his investor status FORCE was engaged in negotiations with to become its Chief Compliance Of cer Early on in their communications CoinMKT s CEO flagged the possibility of a con ict with FORCE simultaneously being a DEA agent and serving as CoinMKT s compliance of cer noting in a November I 2013 email Just FYI if there s a work con ict I m not interested in doing anything illegal so if we have to wait until you re not officially an employee with or whatever then let me know you re the best judge of that On November 16 2013 CoinMKT s CEO wrote to FORCE asking a few questions For example Where would you work Would you retain your old job FORCE I would work here in Baltimore I m not sure how much longer I will be staying here at DEA What connections can you bring to the table to help us with compliance FORCE I have numerous contacts with IRS-Criminal Investigations and my Intel Analyst among others have direct access to Financial Crimes Enforcement Network plus I can run queries in criminal databases database name omitted for suSpect members of I know from my training and experience as a law enforcement officer that running checks in government databases such as the one FORCE referred to by name in the email above is strictly forbidden if not for an of cial law enforcement purpose In fact misuse of a government database may violate federal law and expose the offender to potential criminal liability Nor does it appear that FORCE was speaking in the future tense about what he could do for down the road in the event he left the DEA and had full-time employment with because his offer to run checks in criminal databases such as the one he mentioned by name would have been contingent upon his remaining an agent in order to have access to such databases Moreover FORCE explicitly indicated that he would remain at DEA and simultaneously perform compliance work for In a November 23 2013 email FORCE stated you know for right now I think it would be better if you just pay me in stock options I will stay on with DEA until AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 27 hits it 'big time I have a lot of down time at DEA so I am con dent that I can handle all that needs to be done regarding Legal and Compliance on a daily basis has advised that it needed a bank account in order to be successful in the digital currency eld On November 25 2013 CoinMKT s CEO wrote to FORCE stating that a primary anti money laundering AML contact was needed and asking if could list FORCE as its AML point of contact Subsequently on January 13 2014 advised FORCE it was listing FORCE as its Compliance Of cer for purposes of contact with a bank FORCE responded the next day All right 1et s hope this goes Again this was while FORCE was still employed as a DEA agent During the latter part of 2013 FORCE and continued to discuss role as a Compliance Of cer By January 2014 email correspondence indicates that thought of and included FORCE as part of its core team including him on internal emails For example in a January 20 2014 email CoinMKT s CEO sent to about 11 employees describing each employee s job description FORCE was listed as the third person after the two founders as compliance extraordinaire Although authored this email other communications demonstrate that FORCE thought of himself as one of the team and encouraged to use his status his name bio and photo in their company materials For example on February 19 2014 FORCE provided a headshot and bio to include in pitch decks for investors And on January 25 2014 FORCE wrote inquiring if was registered with appropriate authorities and offering guidance about money transmission laws In his email inquiry FORCE used phrasing that suggested he was part of the company this will keep Hg from having the Feds seize any monies from us under 18 U S C Section 1960 eventually when hit the big time 1E are going to have to get a license from each state that we have customers emphasis added has provided numerous emails between and personal email account A search warrant was also obtained and served on Microsoft which hosts Outlook email for personal emails Some of the emails between FORCE and were included in the Microsoft production However several other of the emails that provided were not included 5 has con rmed that they used bio and pro le and solicited venture fundraising in the San Francisco Bay Area within the Northern District of California AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 28 the production that Microsoft made including many of the emails excerpted above The FBI has conferred with Microsoft about this issue and was advised that all emails from personal email were provided and that any emails that were missing likely meant that the user had deleted those emails In other words it appears to me that FORCE may have selectively deleted certain inculpatory emails between himself and Unlawful Seizure of Funds R P was a California resident who held an account at during at least 2013 and 2014 R P maintained cash in his account with as well as various brands of digital currency to include bitcoin litecoin feathercoin and worldcoin On February 5 2014 emailed FORCE regarding what it initially believed to be suspicious activity by RP noting that R P had withdrawn $10 000 three times instead of once for $30 000 sought direction from FORCE on how to proceed noting R P had approximately 128 bitcoin approximately $109 000 at the time in his account with On February 8 2014 FORCE emailed directing them to suspend account and to tell that the federal government is investigating him for federal violations of 18 USC 1956 money laundering and 18 USC 1960 unlicensed money transmitter and 31 USC 5324 will seize the 128 federally and do all the On or about February 7 2014 FORCE instructed a DEA intelligence analyst to run a criminal history check on R P noting that the purpose was to uncover illegal activity on R P According to a subsequent report FORCE authored the only information found on R P was that he had previously withdrawn $17 000 had a felony conviction for vandalism and was a self employed actor Nonetheless on February 8 2014 at direction froze account On February 10 2014 FORCE now using his of cial DOJ account instead of the personal email account he had historically used to communicate with served an administrative subpoena on requesting that they provide all information regarding R P FORCE also sent the subpoena to by facsimile later that day CoinMKT s facsimile services are hosted by Hello Fax a company based in San Francisco within the Northern District of California AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 29 IxFebruary 11 2014 CoinMKT s CEO emailed FORCE to relay that some feedback from other users may throw off our thesis about this user s activity Let s talk when you can I m glad I caught this CoinMKT s CEO has explained that he learned that a glitch in CoinMKT s system was not permitting users to withdraw more than $10 000 worth of currency at a time thereby diminishing the earlier suspicion that R P was structuring transactions or doing anything criminal FORCE replied to this email inquiring whether had frozen account and seeking information concerning digital currency balances noting that R P may have a mental condition On March 1 2014 RR wrote to advising that he had not been able to log in to his account replied to RP that his account had been suspended due to suspicious activity Under government subpoena we have been instructed to forward your communication to authorities We have cc d Mr Carl FORCE who will be your point of contact please send further communication to him to resolve this issue A Report of Investigation FORCE authored states that on February 26 2014 and March 6 2014 FORCE attempted to contact R P stating have attempted to contact you numerous times via telephone and emails yet have received no response I am trying to ascertain if your suspicious nancial transactions at have a legitimate explanation The facts show that you are structuring deposits and withdrawals In addition virtual currencies have been linked to illicit activities such as illegal narcotics transactions money laundering child pornography etc As such I am starting the legal process to seize your Real Money Balances at A negative response to this email will be evidence that you are abandoning your assets at Over the coming weeks FORCE directed to seize account has expressed it was hesitant to do so but did not want to draw the ire of federal law enforcement especially given that the digital currency eld was already subject to fairly intense law enforcement scrutiny also felt it prudent to defer to the direction of a federal law enforcement agent and trusted that if FORCE was telling that R P was using their company as a platform for illegal activities it was not in a position to second guess that conclusion Nonetheless requested something in writing from FORCE before seizing account AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 30 During this March 2014 timeframe account with contained two forms of currency First it contained approximately $3 7 000 in cash Second it contained approximately $297 000 in four forms of different digital currencies bitcoin litecoin feathercoin and worldcoin FORCE instructed to seize balances etfectuated this seizure by creating an entirely new account with the name R_seized On March 12 2014 emailed FORCE carbon c0pying others at the DEA stating that it had created the R_seized account providing the login and password information and asking FORCE to please advise when you would like us to move the funds from the RF account into the R_seized account Later that same day FORCE replied to including none of the other recipients on the original message in his reply Transfer them now please On March 23 2014 using his of cial DEA email account with no one carbon c0pied FORCE emailed noting that we checked the balances this morning in the Rmseized account and the coins are still not there Is everything okay replied later that same day that they had experienced some logistical issues in effectuating the transfer of digital currency from account to the R_seized account On March 26 2014 emailed FORCE stating the funds should be in your account We made the move 2 days ago but please con rm on your end that you have received them FORCE replied from his of cial DEA email account with no one carbon copied Yes they are in account now Thank you very much I have con rmed that no such digital currency funds were received in any of cial DEA account but instead went into own personal account with Bitstamp as described further below On April 3 2014 FORCE emailed from his of cial DEA account this time carbon copying three other DEA employees including his supervisor directing to please convert the $37 051 08 that has been seized from RR into a certi ed check and forward it to DEA please make the certi ed check payable to the US Marshals Service did so and sent the government a certi ed check for $37 051 08 representing that portion of account that had been in cash In a Report of Investigation dated March 11 2014 FORCE wrote that on March 13 2014 DEA seized the following 179 7977 bitcoin 3 417 565 Litecoin 366 511 2876 feathercoin and AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 31 621 439 7182 worldcoin from for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act statutes more speci cally structuring nancial transactions and money laundering was exploiting to launder his illicit proceeds FORCE did not attempt to translate these various digital currency balances to any approximate dollar values as he had done in other instances In a Report of Investigation dated April 3 2014 FORCE made reference to the earlier March 11 Report of Investigation and noted that on April 4 2014 DEA seized $37 206 30 from FORCE directed to forward a certi ed check for $37 206 30 to the US Marshal s Service A Standard Seizure Form SSF is a government form that is typically completed by the DEA when funds are seized FORCE prepared two SSFs relative to RR 1 an SSF dated April 3 2014 for the approximately $37 000 in cash that was seized from account and 2 an SSF dated March 12 2014 for the approximately $297 000 worth of digital currency that was seized from account However FORCE instructed the DEA Asset Forfeiture Specialist not to input the digital currency SSF into the government s computer tracking system for seized funds the Consolidated Asset Tracking System CATS but rather to hold it for a few months or until further notice The DEA Asset Forfeiture Specialist made a handwritten note on the digital currency SSF noting that FORCE had expressly directed it not be input at that time FORCE included a copy of the SSF relating to the cash in the of cial case le of the Silk Road investigation However he did not include a copy of the SSF relating to the digital currency in that same case le It appears that FORCE papered up the seizure of the digital currency portion of account in such a way that he may have thought he would be covered in the event anyone ever asked any questions about it being documented but at the same time in a way that made it appear as if the approximately $37 000 in cash was the sum total of all that was seized from RR Telling in this regard is that 1 when FORCE emailed from his of cial DEA account about the approximately $37 000 in cash he carbon copied numerous individuals the same was not true when he emailed about the approximately $297 000 worth of digital currency 2 co-case agent has advised that she was '7 My investigation con rmed with then-supervisor that the RP case had no known connection to the Silk Road AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 32 the belief that only approximately $3 7000 total was seized from account and was unaware of the remaining approximately $297 000 in digital currency that had been seized from account 3 FORCE completed SSF for both the cash and digital currency seizures but did not include the SSF for the digital currency in the case le and 4 FORCE directed that the digital currency SSF be held In sum I believe the way in which FORCE documented the RP seizure was attempt to give himself plausible deniability by memorializing the digital currency seizure in both a Report of Investigation and SSF albeit in a fashion that did not draw attention to the fact that it was worth approximately $297 000 The documentation is particularly oblique for someone unfamiliar with digital currency as many in chain of command were The approximately $297 000 worth of digital currency funds'8 from account did not make it to any of cial DEA or government account Instead that amount ultimately went into personal Bitstamp account and was subsequently liquidated into US dollars into personal checking account Speci cally on April 14 2014 the funds moved from the R Seized account that had set up into a pass-through account Then on April 16 2014 those funds moved from the pass through account to personal Bitstamp account In late April 2014 FORCE made a withdrawal request of approximately $201 000 from his Bitstamp account to his personal checking account I have also con rmed with DEA that no case was ever opened against RR 1 am aware of no legal basis on which FORCE seized balances Within days of the seizure of the approximately $297 000 in digital currency funds from RR FORCE launched his own personal limited liability company dedicated to the investment in and speculation of digital currency Engedi LLC Use of Of cial Subpoena for His Own Financial Gain Venmo is a payments platform company that enables person to-person and merchant payment transactions using an application on mobile phones or other internet connected devices Venmo is a subsidiary of PayPal based in San Jose California and as discussed relevant personnel from Venmo s compliance division are based in San Francisco California both within the Northern District of 8 The precise deposit amount was 222 9989 bitcoins AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 33 Califomia On or about February 12 2012 FORCE opened a Venmo account with the user name cforce That same day a user by the name of R R also opened a Venmo account Also on or about February 12 2014 initiated a payment to FORCE using Venmo s platform The note on the transaction to FORCE stated Reversing payment #7163719 for $2500 00 from user to user better bitcoin Venmo s fraud controls identified high risk payment activity and blocked both and accounts On February 13 2014 FORCE contacted Venmo by email from one of his personal email addresses to request among other things that his account with Venmo be unlocked so he could withdraw $2 500 FORCE informed Venmo that R R was the target of a federal undercover investigation for which FORCE was the assigned case agent and the payment was for an undercover Bitcoin transaction FORCE attached a copy of his badge and credentials in this email and also mentioned in a post-script that he was interested in partnering with Venmo for employment opportunities On or about February 17 2014 with his account at Venmo still blocked FORCE served an administrative subpoena on Venmo from his of cial DOJ email account Carl M Force@usdoj gov with a carbon copy to one of his personal email addresses In this email FORCE stated Please comply to the attached subpoena If you should have any questions please call me at The attached subpoena commanded the production of documents related to RR and directing Venmo s administrator to lift the freeze on the account of Carl Force effective immediately The subpoena itself contained a speci c case matter number and grand jury number FORCE sent this subpoena to Venmo s law enforcement contact within its compliance division who was based in San Francisco within the Northern District of California Given Venmo s belief that request to unfreeze a personal account was not a proper use of an of cial government administrative subpoena and given repeated contact with Venmo from his personal email address Venmo did not lift the freeze on account and instead noti ed superiors in the DEA On February 24 2014 FORCE emailed Venmo s compliance team in San Francisco and instructed them to disregard the subpoena AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 34 March 4 2014 FORCE asked one of his co-case agents on the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force to run a query in a law enforcement database for Venmo stating that he wanted to collaborate on a suspicious money remitter Venmo Inc Venmo has since registered with but I want to know if they have state money license remitting licenses in California and New York Can you check If not I want to seize their bank accounts need to identify them a la BRIDGES and seizure warrants for Mt Gox In other words FORCE appears to have been targeting Venmo for seizure after the company rebuffed his attempts to use a subpoena for his own personal matter On March 13 2014 FORCE again used his personal email account to email Venmo s support division In that email FORCE advised Venmo that if they refused to unfreeze his account he would retain an attorney and file a civil lawsuit In another email FORCE sent to Venmo later that same day FORCE explained the funds in his Venmo account were personal and stolen by RR and As such this $2 500 has nothing to do with DEA it was my personal assets that were stolen by On March 14 2014 FORCE again using his personal email address directed Venmo not to contact the DEA again The administrative subpoena addressed to Venmo contains DEA Special Agent signature stamp on the signature line AR was acting supervisor during the relevant timeframe of the subpoena A P stated he did not review or sign the subpoena and believes that FORCE without knowledge used signature stamp to execute the subpoena Following submission of his letter of resignation on May 4 2014 described above another DEA employee witnessed FORCE taking boxes into a room where documents are taken to be permanently burned or destroyed The contents of burn boxes have since been seized and analyzed Among other documents these burn boxes contained copies of the administrative subpoena to Venmo However superior reported that there are no copies of this subpoena in the Baltimore Silk Road case file Based on the foregoing FORCE issued and used an of cial government subpoena for his own personal nancial gain and transmitted it to a third party By doing so there is probable cause to believe that FORCE committed a violation of the con ict of interest statute in violation 18 U S C Section 208 I also believe FORCE was trying to cover up evidence of his use of the subpoena by AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 35 Ixplacing the copies in his burn box instead of the official case le Furthermore I believe that by directing Venmo to ignore the subpoena and not to contact the DEA FORCE was attempting to obstruct justice by concealing his wrongful use of an official government subpoena for a personal matter Additional Evidence ConcerningBitstamp Bitstamp is a global digital currency exchange headquartered in Europe with a limited US presence in San Francisco within the Northern District of California On October 12 2013 FORCE attempted to create an account with Bitstamp using identi cation documents in the name of his DEA- issued undercover identity Bitstamp s veri cation process rejected these documents as not genuine FORCE thereafter provided Bitstamp with his own personal identi cation documents and his true and correct name and Bitstamp created an account in name Bitstamp account is associated with a single bank account and with two email personal addresses One of the personal email addresses contains the moniker at broker which refers to someone who trades in currency The account is associated with personal checking account at Bank On approximately November 9 2013 FORCE made his rst withdrawal request from Bitstamp for approximately $34 000 worth of bitcoins I have reviewed personal bank records and see an incoming international wire transfer to bank account in the amount of approximately $34 000 on November 13 2013 Thereafter FORCE made a second withdrawal request of Bitstamp for approximately $96 000 worth of bitcoins This withdrawal request triggered Bitstamp to conduct a Know Your Customer KYC check also referred to as enhanced due diligence on approximately November 20 2013 This check essentially involved Bitstamp asking for more information from FORCE Throughout the latter part of November 2013 FORCE had a series of back and forth exchanges with Bitstamp using his personal email account FORCE responded to Bitstamp s know-your-customer queries stating among other things the following am a Special Agent with the Drug Enforcement Administration and learned about Bitcoin through my investigation of SILK ROAD 1 have attached a copy of my resume and a scanned copy of my badge and credentials 9 All of these amounts represented in dollars from Bitstamp were in bitcoin based on their value at the time of the transfers AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 36 appears that account with Bitstamp remained active after these initial know-your customer checks as his personal bank records reveal two incoming deposits from his account with Bitstamp in January 2014 for approximately $57 000 and $50 000 On April 18 2014 FORCE requested a withdrawal from his account with Bitstamp of approximately $80 000 to be deposited into his bank account Bitstamp agged this request and conducted additional know-your customer checks Bitstamp s review showed that account had been accessed using TOR Given this Bitstamp blocked account 0 To unblock his account FORCE made the following statements via an online support ticket with Bitstamp I am a US Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration DEA Special Agent who worked the original SILK ROAD website and corresponding investigation I learned about Bitcoin through my investigation of DREAD PIRATE ROBERTS and SILK ROAD I am attaching a scanned copy of my DEA credentials and badge to verify my status as Law Enforcement Again I obtained my bitcoin from investing a couple thousand dollars in the virtual currency in the beginning of 2012 when they were selling at $4 a coin from exchanges such as GetBitcoin LLC small mom and pop exchanges Also I have increased my holding ofbitcoin through trading the buying and selling of the I trade in Bitcoin As such I am constantly buying shorting selling transferring purchasing other assets such as real estate through and gold through goldsilverbitcoin I plan to continue to utilize Bitstamp to purchase and sell Bitcoin at a profit On April 24 2014 as part of Bitstamp s fraud and theft prevention procedures Bitstamp inquired why FORCE accessed his account through TOR and FORCE responded via the support ticket 20 Within a day after Bitstamp froze account on April 18 2014 FORCE sent an e-mail on April 19 2014 to another DEA Special Agent whose primary responsibility was to account for undercover funds DEA had expended e-mail indicated that the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force had hundreds of bitcoin that they want to put into service and requested the creation of a DEA account with an exchange to liquidate bitcoin into US dollars That Special Agent advises that April 19 e mail was unusual because it was sent on a Saturday evening and there was a signi cant delay in time from when FORCE had acquired the bitcoin to when he sent the e mail I believe based on my investigation that the timing of April 19 email was not coincidental given that Bitstamp had frozen his account earlier that day and he may have suspected that law enforcement had discovered that the bitcoins in his personal account were not his property By sending such an e mail FORCE would be able to later maintain that he had tried to return the bitcoin to the government AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 37 utilize TOR for privacy Don t particularly want NSA looking over my shoulder The following day a member of Bitstamp s management learned of FORCE's comments and thought it was strange that a government of cial would make such a statement account was blocked again On April 28 2014 FORCE made another withdrawal request from his account at Bitstamp of approximately $201 000 worth of bitcoin to his personal bank account It is clear that account with Bitstamp was frozen and unfrozen numerous times during the April timeframe a er FORCE veri ed his identity After Speaking with another then-member of federal law enforcement BRIDGES Bitstamp subsequently processed the withdrawal request and bank records reveal that he received approximately $201 000 to his bank account on May 6 2014 Based on my investigation described above I believe that some if not all of the bitcoins that went into account with Bitstamp was property that belonged to the government and or third parties and that FORCE had come into possession of in his capacity as a DEA Special Agent and not his own personally-acquired bitcoins as he told Bitstamp On or about May 2 2014 FORCE emailed Bitstamp to request that they delete all transaction history associated with his account I believe based on my investigation and the timing of request that this was an attempt by FORCE to conceal his activity Evidence of Improved Financial Picture I have reviewed many but not all of bank records from 2009 to present I have also reviewed a nancial analysis the FBI prepared of nancial history Based on these sources nancial situation and spending increased dramatically during 2013 and 2014 the timeframe of the wrongdoing described herein In summary for the nearly two year period before FORCE worked the Silk Road case FORCE deposited a total of approximately $250 000 into his bank accounts an amount consistent with his federal salary In contrast to that the bank records show that in the just over two-year timeframe from joining the Silk Road case to his May 2014 resignation FORCE deposited approximately $776 000 into his bank accounts an amount that represented solely his liquidation of bitcoins On or about February 17 2012 FORCE began working on the Silk Road investigation Thereafter his nancial situation improved markedly In 2013 and 2014 FORCE had total deposits that AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 38 have traced as bitcoin liquidation proceeds worth over approximately $776 000 This includes for example six sizeable deposits into checking accounts from his Bitstamp account totaling approximately $518 000 There were also approximately $118 000 worth of deposits from Coinbase another San rancisco based digital currency exchange company where FORCE had a personal account spending also increased after his involvement on the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force Aside from his approximately $110 000 bitcoin investment into FORCE paid offa $22 000 government loan on November 19 2013 On December 2 2013 he paid off his mortgage in full which was approximately $130 000 outstanding On February 18 2014 FORCE signed a Purchaser Agreement with Inc listing his net worth in excess of $1 million and providing a $15 000 investment in three real properties On or about May 8 2014 presumably after learning of the government s investigation and after he had resigned FORCE wired $235 000 to an offshore account in Panama Records that I have recovered reveal that this wire was ultimately destined for a digital currency exchange outside the US and that is not registered with the Department of the Treasury s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Based on evidence discussed further below I believe that the vast majority if not all - of this wire represented proceeds of illegal activities Other ways that FORCE appears to have spent some of the proceeds of his ultra vires activities include payments in the tens of thousands of dollars for the following A June 2014 payment for the purchase of a company franchise 0 An August 2014 payment to a Scottrade account 0 A September 2014 transfer to an E Trade account 0 A September 2014 check payable to Cash These are illustrative examples and not all of the nancial outlays known to the government Moreover FORCE appears to have funded the business he opened on the side for speculating in Bitcoin Engedi LLC with money from his personal checking accounts into which he had transferred ill-gotten proceeds On May 7 2014 FORCE opened a new bank account with Gardner Bank in the Engedi LLC name funding it 20 days later with an $8 000 check from personal checking account And on AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 39 July 28 2014 FORCE transferred $93 000 from his personal checking account to the Engedi account at Gardner Bank False Statements and Obstructive Conduct Upon learning he was the subject of this investigation FORCE through counsel approached the government about meeting for a voluntary interview FORCE signed the Northern District of California and Public Integrity Section s standard form Proffer Agreement sometimes known as a Queen for a Day letter This Agreement is standard in criminal investigations and provided among other things that if FORCE was truthful the government could not make direct use of the information FORCE provided against him in a future case-in-chief An important exception to the protections of the Proffer Agreement was that FORCE could be prosecuted for perjury obstruction of justice or false statements in the event he was untruthful during the session Pursuant to the Proffer Agreement FORCE met with representatives from the US Attorney s Of ce for the Northern District of California the Public Integrity Section the FBI IRS and OIG on May 30 2014 During that proffer session FORCE was specifically asked whether he had ever used the moniker French Maid FORCE denied that he had As demonstrated above this was not truthful as FORCE had operated as French Maid in communications with DPR among other personas Additionally conduct throughout the investigation obstructed the real proper purpose of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force which was to identify locate and arrest DPR and other Silk Road users At numerous points FORCE corruptly obstructed the lawful investigation into DPR and Silk Road by pursuing his own personal and unlawful goals BRIDGES PROBABLE CAUSE Bridges Background Former Secret Service Special Agent BRIDGES was also on the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force and worked alongside FORCE Until March 18 2015 before he abruptly resigned BRIDGES had been assigned to the Secret Service s Electronic Crimes Task Force His specialty was in computer forensics and anonymity software derived from TOR Another member of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force that has been interviewed con rmed that BRIDGES was the Task Force s subject matter expert in Bitcoin AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 40 Uthese roles BRIDGES had access to and used digital currency and was the af ant on various seizure warrants pertaining to digital currency In fact on May 9 2013 BRIDGES was the af ant on one of the largest-ever seizures from a digital currency exchange This was an approximately $2 1 million seizure pertaining to the digital currency exchange Mt Gox purportedly because Mt Gox had violated 18 U S C Section 1960 by failing to register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and thus was engaged in operating an unlicensed money service business This is not the only matter on which BRIDGES served as the af ant The Silk Road Theft and Fidelity Account C G was one of employees and functioned as a Silk Road customer support representative under the usemame Flush In this role C G had administrator access to the Silk Road website 21 meaning C G had certain administrative privileges on the Silk Road website including the ability to access vendor accounts and reset Silk Road user and vendor passwords and pins On or about January 17 2013 FORCE and BRIDGES were part of a team that apprehended C G in a controlled delivery for a kilogram of cocaine C G was arrested and soon thereafter began to cooperate with law enforcement turning over his Silk Road login credentials in the process to members of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force During this same timeframe C G also turned over access to his account and passwords to other digital currency accounts to include his Mt Gox and Dwolla accounts As a result of this controlled delivery C G was charged with federal criminal narcotics charges 22 One of the accounts that C G provided access to was a Silk Road administrator account named Flush C G acted as a Customer Service representative on the Silk Road site using the account name Flush But on January 17 2013 CG turned over access to the Flush account to members of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force C G also executed several consent forms authorizing law enforcement to use and assume the Flush identity 23 2 This should not be construed as someone who had root access to the server 22 It should be noted that C G is cooperating with law enforcement and is hoping for leniency in sentencing as a part of his cooperation criminal history includes convictions for ling a fraudulent insurance claim and acquiring a controlled substance by prescription alteration 23 Because of concerns about whereabouts DPR at some point cut off the Flush account s access but through communications with DPR C G was able to regain access to the account on January 20 2013 and pass that information onto the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 41 January 25 2013 CG debriefed with FORCE BRIDGES and other members of the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force According to report of the interview C G showed them how to log into Silk Road vendor accounts and reset passwords how to change the status ofa seller to a vendor how to reset pins and information about how the Silk Road administrative functions worked text messages indicate that he left the proffer session after one day and a Silk Road Task Force member stated that BRIDGES told him that he left the latter part of the January 25 2013 proffer 24 On January 25 2013 during the afternoon and into the night the Silk Road website suffered a series of sizeable thefts These thefts affected certain Silk Road vendors and overlapped with the time of the CG proffer session The thefts were accomplished through a series of vendor password and pin resets something that could be accomplished with the administrator access that C G had given to the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force I On January 26 2013 the proffer of CG continued BRIDGES left early and did not participate on this day At some point during that day DPR communicated to Nob FORCE that Silk Road had suffered thefts and that those thefts were associated with account Law enforcement questioned C G about this and CG denied that he had committed the thefts According to chats I have reviewed from the Silk Road servers and from Ulbricht s laptop as well as communications between DPR and one of his employees at the time of the January 25 2013 thefts it appears that DPR and the employee believed C G was responsible for the thefts because they managed to associate account Flush with the theft 25 As a result of belief that C G was responsible for the thefts DPR communicated with Nob FORCE whom he believed to be a major drug dealer with the ability to procure hit men and hired Nob to have his associates kill C G DPR also communicated with another individual and commissioned a hit on C G For the hit that Nob s associates were to perform DPR paid Nob a total of approximately $80 000 through a bank wire transfer for the murder FORCE and CG together with assistance from others on the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force then faked death to make it look 24 This Task Force member was not present for the CG debrief but indicated that BRIDGES had told him this information 25 On or about January 26 2013 according to chats between DPR and another employee Flush s administrative account was shut down in order to prevent further theft AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 42 IxNob s associates had killed C G BRIDGES was to assist with perpetrating this supposed murder- for-hire by working on proofofdeath photographs ofC G that Nob FORCE was to send to DPR Based on my review of the data from the Silk Road servers I believe the initial Silk Road thefts were likely committed by whoever was controlling a Silk Road account with the usemame 'Number13 Prior to January 25 2013 Number13 had been an ordinary buyer account on Silk Road On January 25 2013 however 'Number13 was given vendor privileges Also on January 25 2013 the Flush account made a transfer of approximately 900 bitcoins into account Number13 This appears to have been the rst of multiple thefts that occurred that day from the Silk Road website My analysis of both the block chain and data recovered from the Silk Road servers reveals that also on January 25 2013 a single Bitcoin address received no less than 20 000 bitcoins 26 The rst transaction into that Bitcoin address was a deposit by account Number13 These transactions are demonstrated on the attached Exhibit Liquidation of Silk Road Theft Proceeds I believe that BRIDGES controlled and or had access with others to Number13 the account that appears to have initiated the sizeable bitcoin thefts I believe this for at least two reasons First in a DEA 6 that FORCE authored dated January 23 2013 FORCE described how he had transferred 6O bitcoins into a DEA controlled account known as TrustUsJones Data from the Silk Road servers demonstrates that on that January 23 2013 date there was a 60 bitcoin transfer from Number13 into TrustUsJones Second in an email dated January 23 2013 FORCE emailed BRIDGES requesting that BRIDGES deposit bitcoins to replenish the TrustUsJones account In other words BRIDGES in consultation with FORCE appears to have been controlling Number13 during the late January 2013 timeframe On January 26 2013 my analysis of the block chain reveals that at least 2 430 of the bitcoins stolen from the Silk Road went into another single Bitcoin wallet address These transactions are also depicted on the attached Exhibit F I have conferred with an individual who has a substantial 26 I believe that the aggregate total of the thefts was approximately 20 000 bitcoin The dollar value of 20 000 bitcoin would have varied dramatically depending on when the value was calculated due to the uctuating value of bitcoin At the time of thefts in January 2013 20 000 bitcoin would have been worth approximately $350 000 At its peak price however it would have been worth far more in excess of approximately $20 million AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL 43 background in block chain analysis who advised me that this wallet funded a Mt Gox exchange account totaling 2 430 bitcoins As noted Mt Gox was the world s largest digital currency exchange based in Japan Chats I have reviewed between DPR and one of his employees indicate that DPR and the employee launched an internal investigation into who was responsible for the January 25 2013 theft Those chats reveal that own internal investigation initially led him to account Number13 as being associated with the thefts Chats further reveal that Numberl 3 sent DPR a chat on January 27 2013 saying Whats sic going on I really need that money back What has happened to all my Within the past day someone withdrawled sic 27 all my be from my account without my permission The fact they must have had a pin really confuses me and makes me think it was something on your end This caused DPR to reply to Numberl3 stating Your account is under investigation I m afraid What is your relationship with the user omitted During a back and forth between the two Numberl3 wrote don t know what any of that other crap in my history is Look at my history I am a buyer not a seller What is going on man This caused DPR to reply You re all set sorry for the trouble DPR was physically present in San Francisco on the date of these communications with Number 1 3 The Silk Road thefts were completed on January 25 2013 Within days BRIDGES began to text FORCE asking that FORCE as Nob get advice from DPR about liquidating bitcoins into dollars For example on January 30 2013 BRIDGES texted FORCE Next time you chat with DPR do you think he would touch on the topic of how he moves bitcoins meaning what exchange he uses He should have some advise sic if you will be doing big drug deals on how to exchange all that back into US dollars FORCE replied that he had asked DPR that before and DPR would not provide an answer BRIDGES replied Roger Just curious Approximately two weeks after the Silk Road thefts on February 12 2013 BRIDGES formed Quantum International Investments Quantum and registered it with the Maryland Secretary of 27 The individual controlling Numberl 3 on this date Spelled withdrawal as withdrawled When BRIDGES texted FORCE on February 23 2013 as discussed herein BRIDGES also spelled the word withdrawal incorrectly using the different withdrawlaed AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 44 State On February 22 2013 BRIDGES established a personal investment account at Fidelity in the Quantum name That account was associated with Social Security number and other accounts in name That day and the next BRIDGES began to text with FORCE about getting help and transferring bitcoins Speci cally BRIDGES texted FORCE on February 22 2013 Whenever you are working next can we talk The prosecutor said you have the gift of convincing to do things and we need you to convince him to do something Whenever your sic available can we chat Then on February 23 2013 BRIDGES texted FORCE Need your help with DPR if you can I am trying to transfer out our Bitcoins and they have not shown up in over 30 hours after being withdrawlaed sicyour workers or nancial guys bitcoins are not showing up I am going to get my butt kicked if this money is missing After 30 hours I am getting really concerned Our one UC account is omitted name Can you use your raport sic and help me out I did the transfer yesterday morning It is clear that during this time period both BRIDGES and FORCE were actively monitoring the price of bitcoin On February 24 2013 BRIDGES texted FORCE If you got bitcoins on SR Silk Road get them By the end of March BRIDGES and FORCE were texting about the value of bitcoin On March 20 2013 FORCE texted BRIDGES Bitcoin just hit $63 what the slip to which BRIDGES replied and then FORCE replied sp eculation about big investors going in later this month Along with the demand is exceeding supply Then on March 21 2013 BRIDGES texted FORCE 75 dollars now and FORCE replied Geez I have obtained and reviewed Fidelity records for Quantum account Those records demonstrate that between March 6 2013 and May 7 2013 the account received nine separate wire transfers originating from Mt Gox in Japan The wires totaled in excess of $820 000 and were each less than $100 000 Fidelity has confirmed that Quantum account was funded solely by deposits from Mt Gox and no other source The final wire from Mt Gox to Quantum account was on May 7 2013 Just two days later BRIDGES served as the afflant on a seizure warrant for $2 1 million in Mt Gox accounts I know from my training and experience as a law enforcement officer that the process of putting together an affidavit in support of a warrant is time consuming and often takes several days if not longer to AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 45 prepare In serving as an af ant for Mt Gox bank accounts a mere two days after he had personally received a wire from Mt Gox the latest in a series of wires BRIDGES had a con ict ofinterest In early 2015 by which time BRIDGES knew of the Northern District of California s investigation into the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force BRIDGES was working on an unrelated investigation Under the guise of that other investigation BRIDGES contacted Coinbase a digital currency exchange based in San Francisco However instead of asking only questions concerning the other investigation Coinbase representatives report that BRIDGES engaged them in a series of questions about whether and how Mt Gox accounts could be traced Coinbase found this odd given that the stated purpose calls concerned an unrelated investigation Based on the foregoing I believe that BRIDGES or someone acting on his behalf utilized the Flush and Number13 accounts but particularly the Flush account to fraudulently act as an administrator to reset pins and passwords on various Silk Road vendors accounts and then caused bitcoins to be moved from those accounts into a particular wallet and then into the Mt Gox exchange Moreover I believe that BRIDGES and or someone working with him or acting on his behalf used the Number13 account to communicate with DPR and fraudulently represent that Number13 was a buyer account on Silk Road who had nothing to do with the theft to stave off investigation into Number13 and its activity I believe these communications were material At the time of these communications DPR was in the Northern District of California and the Bitcoin stolen as a result ofthe Silk Road thefts was in a Bitcoin address and had not yet been transferred to Mt Gox For all of these reasons there is probable cause to believe that BRIDGES committed wire fraud in violation of 18 U S C Section 1343 Conduct During The Investigation On April 29 2014 Bitstamp s General Counsel advised BRIDGES by telephone from the Northern District of California that Bitstamp su3pected FORCE of wrongdoing and intended to formally bring it to the attention of law enforcement via a Bank Secrecy Act ling Bitstamp did so on May 1 2014 By May 4 2014 FORCE submitted a letter of resignation after 15 years of service to be effective later that month AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 46 approximately May 2 2014 the US Attorney s Of ce for the Northern District of California opened an official investigation into FORCE concerning his activities with his Bitstamp account and bitcoin holdings On approximately May 4 2014 the Public Integrity Section opened an of cial investigation into FORCE concerning his improper use of a subpoena to Venmo On May 8 2014 the Northern District of California and Public Integrity investigations were merged Between April 29 2014 and May 5 2014 an analyst with whom BRIDGES worked at the Secret Service E P ran several queries in a government database looking for Bank Secrecy Act filings on both FORCE and BRIDGES That analyst later ran another query on BRIDGES on or about June 27 2014 this time using Social Security number I know from my training and experience that access to certain government databases is restricted and may not be used for personal matters Based on my investigation I believe that BRIDGES may have directed the analyst to conduct these queries because he was worried that a financial institution may have made a Bank Secrecy Act ling on him given the multiple transfers from Japan into his Quantum Fidelity account 28 On May 28 2014 BRIDGES was telephonically interviewed by a Special Agent with the Public Corruption Squad in San Francisco as part of the Northern District of California s investigation BRIDGES was joined by an attorney representing him and also by a high-level superior from the US Secret Service BRIDGES was advised of the nature of the interview and of the identity of the interviewer During that interview BRIDGES stated that although he knew FORCE through their work on the Baltimore Silk Road Task Force they had minimal contact and BRIDGES had no knowledge of any of activity related to the purchase of bitcoins BRIDGES added that FORCE was unprofessional and that after learning of the Bank Secrecy Act ling of which FORCE was a subject BRIDGES briefed the most senior manager in his of ce the Special Agent in Charge SAC of the Baltimore Field Of ce The SAC told BRIDGES not to discuss the matter with anyone BRIDGES speci cally denied during the May 28 2014 interview that he ever told FORCE about the Bank Secrecy Act ling He also denied having owned any Bitcoin in over a year 28 I believe that the analyst E P ultimately con rmed that she ran BRIDGES in the database but essentially stated that she could not remember whether BRIDGES had speci cally asked her to do so E P had Social Security number for the second query she ran AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 47 November 13 2014 BRIDGES was again interviewed as part of the Northern District of Califomia s investigation this time by representatives from the Justice Department s Public Integrity Section and Office of the Inspector General BRIDGES was advised of the nature of the interview and of the identity of the interviewers BRIDGES advised he had been an af ant on a $2 1 million seizure of accounts belonging to Mt Gox a digital currency exchange He described himself as a subject matter expert on TOR and stated that other members of the Silk Road Task Force would routinely consult him on security and undercover-type questions associated with ongoing Silk Road investigations During this interview he reiterated what he had told the FBI Special Agent previously on May 28 2014 namely that he and FORCE did not have a close working relationship When questioned about Quantum International Investments LLC BRIDGES acknowledged that he created the LLC as a personal business venture but stated that he had requested and obtained speci c approval from the Secret Service Of ce of General Counsel OGC to establish the LLC and use it for investment purposes In contrast to what BRIDGES stated during these interviews my investigation has revealed that several of statements were not accurate These statements were capable of and did in uence the government s investigation On March 18 2015 BRIDGES resigned after being told he was being suspended personnel advised BRIDGES to leave behind his two government issued computers in the evidence vault Although he properly tendered one computer where directed he placed a second Apple brand laptop computer in a cabinet directly above an area that Baltimore personnel use as a wipe station 29 I do not believe BRIDGES would have any reason to store the laptop in this area other than for it to be in close proximity to computers to be wiped as personnel has advised this is not a storage area for laptops Moreover after BRIDGES was advised of his suspension he asked his supervisor if he could access his Dell laptop computer to copy electronic receipts of personal items he had purchased from intemet merchants However instead of copying receipts BRIDGES began copying a folder entitled Bitstamp Upon noticing what BRIDGES was copying his supervisor secured the laptop and did not allow BRIDGES further access 29 Computers were left in the wipe station for the purpose of having their hard drives permanently erased AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 48 Money Laundering On June 2 2014 just days after being interviewed by the FBI Special Agent in this matter BRIDGES wired approximately $225 000 in criminal proceeds from his Fidelity Quantum account to an account at PNC Bank He later wired another approximately $30 000 from the Fidelity Quantum account to the PNC account on or about July 7 2014 The PNC account was in the name of a third- party with whom BRIDGES had a personal relationship and name was also on the account As described above Quantum Fidelity only contained funds transferred from Mt Gox and based on the evidence described in the Silk Road Theft section above I believe the Mt Gox transfers represented criminal proceeds Given that BRIDGES wired $225 000 in criminal proceeds from his Quantum Fidelity account representing proceeds of wire fraud a speci ed unlawful activity into a different account in the name of a third-party at another nancial institution just days after being questioned in this matter I believe that BRIDGES was attempting to conceal the source and nature of the proceeds and further impede the investigation Given the foregoing there is probable cause to believe that $225 000 wire constituted money laundering in violation of 18 U S C 1956 CONCLUSION Based on my training and experience and the facts as set forth in this af davit there is probable cause to believe that FORCE has committed violations of law to include Title 18 United States Code Section 641 Theft of Government Property Title 18 United States Code Section 1343 Wire Fraud and Title 18 United States Code Section 1956 Money Laundering and Title 18 United States Code Section 208 Con ict of Interest There is also probable cause to believe that BRIDGES has committed violations of law to include Title 18 United States Code Section 1343 Wire Fraud and Title 18 United States Code Section 1956 Money Laundering I therefore request that you issue the attached arrest warrants and criminal complaint AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 49 IxREQUEST FOR SEALING 1 further request that the Court order that all papers in support of this af davit including the af davit and criminal complaint be sealed until further order of the Court or until the apprehension and or surrender of the subjects whichever is earlier These documents discuss an ongoing criminal investigation that is neither public nor known to all involved in the investigation Accordingly there is good cause to seal these documents because their premature disclosure may jeopardize that investigation by alerting the subjects in advance of apprehension and or surrender In addition for the reasons stated in the attached Paragraph meant for inclusion at Page 11 of the Af davit I request that that Paragraph be sealed until further Order of this Court The government will move to unseal that Paragraph as soon as practicable as detailed in the sealed portion of that Paragraph attached A Proposed Order is attached Respectfully submitted -x TIGRAN GAMBARYAN Special Agent Internal Revenue Service HONO m MARIA-ELENA JAMES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 50 EXHIBIT A Dr-iterra-m bcrurl mtssagt to DPR Wmcna ur-z - 1 - ma a-d mm tall-l WM 7 MP Dammit Silk Road orders theDw-zad Pnalo obolts anonymous market Search 50 HI DeathFromAbove 0 Shop by Cannon-y Send a message to SR to 0mm Poole Robert - Dread Pirate RODG I13 know that you had something to do w r 'l Curtis' disappearance and death Just wanted to let you know that I'm coming for you Tuqua You are a dead mam Don t think you can elude ma De Qppresso Liner 19% EXHIBIT 8 4 2013 at 22 01 8 4 2013 at 2 05 0 4 2013 at 22 05 134 8 4 2013 at 22 05 127 BTC sent to 61 BTC are sent to BTC sent to 203 BTC sent to IBEeD7H4pU7Seq-4yst 1K gEEngpKE aJSekole 15Xxw7BDpz kanBPAkJNy gB d BL quTleuX sszd 8 5 2013 at 16 00 at 17 24 8 5 2013 at 01 11 3 5 2013 at 01 03 127 BTC sent to 61 BTC sent to 134 BTC sent to 203 BTC sent to lsjA leap YquvangES B 7 uhjxs 0 5 2013 at 00 51 0 5 2013 at 1 22 0 5 2013 at 14 29 8 5 2013 at 14 24 3 5 2013 at 01 20 3 5 2013 at 13 16 2 127 BTC sent to 51 BTC sent to 57 9995 BTC sent to 52 BTC sent to 100 BTC sent to 103 BTC to L1 7quhYDaAZcmayp12 10m v5577405rmde5 1 0 5 2013 01 39 3121 20 13 It 13 01 10A 52 Jim 8003 1 p1qu 5PXM57XIXE 7Tzl vngEZE 24 BTC sent 0 9 5 BT sent to stBethm n 12 21mg 1217022511 091012191 7 0 12 2013 at 00 35 0 12 2013 at 00 35 3 12 2013 at 2 50 0 12 2013 at 2 50 0 12 2013 at 2 50 0 12 2013 at 3 00 015 2013 at 10 45 0 12 2013 at 03 02 11 12 2013 at 13 16 77 9995 07c sent to 49 07c sent to 52 9395 BTC sent to 66 BTC sent to 32 07c sent to 19 3995 07c sent to 100 07c sent to 40 9995 07c sent to 02 07c sent to 18twai5Tul aSQew'V miwvsumuwmde kw 10NT6nZu62cErzkb6 These 24_bitcuins were 1axa'oyEPMn59cm 1DN1'6n2062cErzk05r 15204 01 7 yExDLru 49an Yquw 773w rmKivsdeieEszF A2U3m6X2ipRJanw mKivsdeieEszFs thEHmI lemiK rGPRiQ 031W5Hthm4 0 27 2013 at 00 30 0 27 2013 at 00 30 13 23 2013 at 1 37 0 29 2013 at 1 35 0 30 2013 at 1 30 0 12 2013 at 00 04 11 12 2013 at 00 05 3 30 2013 at 02 21 8 30 2013 at 02 03 77 9995 BTC sent to 49 BTC sent to 52 9395 07c sent to 55 07c sent to 32 BTC sent to 47 BTC sent to 52 9995 BTC sent to 60-9999 BTC sent to 62 BTC sent to 19Yw75than1 dDXa 166 eSqugkN 136'ij 136jva7Rj99TaZPm6 cuGgLyurm These 95 bitcoins were included in the 400 BTC deposit on 9f27 2014fmm vkla3iW5Hthm4 0127 2013 at 12 10 37 5 BTC sent to 3 27 2013 at 12 24 52 9995 BTC sent to 13 30 2013 at 1 42 368 4975 BTC sent to 136jva7Rj99TaZPm6cuGg Lyuth1p4Q4 9 01 2013 at 2 16 4975 BTC sent to 1013 8 30 2013 at 2 26 34 BTC are sent 9 27 2013 at 19 40 525 BTC are sent to lAlGTi3i2tPUg3ojwaH 9 01 2013 at 19 40 525 BTC are sent to 15T7$agsD2JqWUszi fCVuv to136jva7Rj99TaZPm60uGgLyut from 1 825N454 All times are UTC Coordinated Universal Time EXHIBIT Exhibit emaii txt 280 8822 times $607 $170 495 PATN regarding the seizUre of 200 Bitcoin from DREAD PIRATE ROBERTS the vaiue of one Bitcoin on the date of transfer August 4 2013 was $96 877083 that vaiue times the 200 bitcoin equais $19 735 4166 today Bitcoin is at $607 times the 200 bitcoin which is the equiva1ent of $121 400 here the government earned $101 665 the 400 bitcoin that was paid by DREAD PIRATE ROBERTS in June Juiy of 2013 for the frauduient UK identification was worth approximateiy $44 000 today that same 400 bitcoin which is sitting out there in an on iine waiiet is now worth $242 800 400 times $607 50 the U s Government has made to date in appreciation $198 800 Page 1 EXHIBIT Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Baiance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 0 10 004 10 15 2013 22 28 10 004 0 1 10 10 17 201318231 0 0 78 11 07 2013 1 16 67999 0 0 103 56 11 08 2013 17 45 25 56147247 0 From 0 188 57 11 08 2013 22 57 85 00359468 0 From CEEQBX 2 179 81 11 08 2013 23 05 - 875582 $2 889 42 $330 00 14 45 2 178 81 11 08 2013 23 05 -1 $330 00 $330 00 1 48 2 175 36 11 08 2013 23 05 -3 45437 $1 139 94 $330 00 5 02 2 173 36 11 08 2013 23 05 2 $660 00 $330 00 2 78 2 172 86 11 08 2013 23 06 -0 5 $165 00 $330 00 0 7 2 162 86 11 08 2013 23 06 -10 $3 300 00 $330 00 13 86 2 138 57 11 08 2013 23 06 -24 2898 $8 015 64 $330 00 32 07 2 89 35 11 09 2013 14 01 -49 2182 $17 472 46 $355 00 62 91 2 88 57 11 09 2013 14 05 0 78181 $277 54 $355 00 0 89 0 91 9 11 11 2013 2 31 3 33135603 0 0 139 68 11 11 2013 2 37 47 77669137 0 1 139 68 11 11 201310 19 0 30 7 0 169 97 11 11 2013 20 27 30 28967964 0 2 169 96 11 12 2013 0 51 000451 $1 55 $343 77 0 01 2 162 05 11 12 20130 51 7 916 $2 721 28 $343 77 8 17 2 142 05 11 12 2013 0 51 20 $6 875 40 $343 77 22 01 2 141 55 11 12 2013 0 51 0 5 $171 88 $343 77 0 52 2 121 55 11 12 2013 0 51 20 $6 875 40 $343 77 20 63 2 118 86 11 12 2013 0 51 -2 68754 $923 90 $343 77 2 59 0 129 28 '11 12 2013 0 58 10 41990035 0 From 3613pr 2 118 86 11 12 2013 15 46 40 4199 $3 656 24 $350 89 10 24 0 214 5 11 12 2013 19 19 95 63991829 0 From CampBX 2 214 15 11 12 2013 23 21 -0 35 $123 95 $354 14 0 35 2 210 21 11 12 2013 23 21 394183 $1 395 92 $354 13 3 91 2 210 2 11 12 2013 23 21 0 01009 $3 57 $354 13 0 01 2 195 9 11 12 2013 23 21 -14 3 $5 064 06 $354 13 14 18 2 180 9 11 12 2013 23 22 -15 $5 311 95 $354 13 14 88 2 180 79 11 12 2013 23 22 -0 11 $38 95 $354 13 0 11 2 180 78 11 12 2013 23 22 -0 005 $1 77 $354 13 0 01 2 162 78 11 12 2013 23 22 -18 $6 374 34 $354 13 16 58 2 162 7 11 12 2013 23 23 -0 08432 $29 86 $354 13 0 08 2 151 7 11 12 2013 23 23 -11 $3 895 43 $354 13 1013 2 145 7 11 12 2013 23 25 -6 $2 124 78 $354 13 5 1 2 145 11 12 2013 23 25 -0 7 $247 89 $354 13 0 6 2 135 11 12 2013 23 25 -10 $3 541 30 $354 13 8 5 2 134 9 11 12 2013 23 26 -0 1004 $35 55 $354 13 0 09 2 134 61 11 12 2013 23 27 -0 28103 $99 52 $354 13 0 24 2 118 86 11 12 2013 23 28 -15 7573 $5 580 12 $354 13 13 4 0 164 35 11 13 2013 19 23 45 488 0 From CampBX 2 164 01 11 13 2013 19 26 -D 332 $129 97 $391 48 0 32 2 162 51 11 13 2013 19 26 1 5 $587 22 $391 48 1 41 2 161 93 11 13 2013 19 26 058086 $227 39 $391 48 0 55 2 159 58 11 13 201319 26 234797 $919 18 $391 48 2 21 2 159 08 11 13 2013 19 27 40 5 $195 74 $391 48 0 47 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of EITC Wires Dut BTC Price FEE Notes 2 156 4 11 13 20131927 268535 $1051 28 $391 48 2 53 2 156 39 11 13 201319z27 -0 01 33 91 6391 48 0 01 2 154 5 11 13 2013 19 27 1 89254 $740 89 $391 48 1 78 2 154 33 11 13 201319 28 -0 17015 $66 61 $391 48 0 16 2 153 83 11 13 201319 28 -0 5 $195 74 $391 48 0 47 2 150 16 11 13 2013 19 28 3 66695 $1 435 54 $391 48 3 45 2 149 66 11 13 2013 19 29 -0 5 $195 74 $391 48 0 47 2 149 04 11 13 2013 19 29 -0 62 $242 72 $391 48 0 59 2 147 66 11 13 2013 19 29 -1 38 $540 24 $391 48 1 3 2 147 16 11 13 201319 30 -0 5 $195 74 $391 48 0 47 2 146 57 11 13 2013 19 30 059262 $232 00 $391 48 0 56 2 143 8 11 13 2013 19 30 276599 $1 082 83 $391 48 2 6 2 143 19 11 13 2013 19 45 -0 60643 $237 40 $391 48 0 57 2 140 72 11 13 2013 19 45 2 47349 $968 32 $391 48 2 33 2 137 77 11 13 2013 19 45 2 95103 $1 155 27 $391 48 2 78 2 137 27 11 13 2013 19 47 0 5 $195 74 $391 48 0 47 2 137 21 11 13 2013 19 47 006358 $24 89 $391 48 0 06 2 136 71 11 13 201319z48 -0 5 $195 74 $391 48 0 47 2 136 7 11 13 201319 48 -0 0102 $3 99 $391 48 0 01 2 126 41 11 13 2013 19 48 40 2854 $4 026 53 $391 48 8 86 2 126 37 11 13 2013 19 49 0 03848 $15 06 $391 48 0 04 2 118 86 11 13 201319 49 -7 51497 $2 941 96 $391 48 6 48 0 183 86 11 14 2013 2 10 64 9998 0 0 225 86 11 14 2013 2 18 41 9999 0 2 225 64 11 14 2013 15 22 0 213 $88 43 $415 16 0 2 2 217 64 11 14 201315 23 -8 $3 321 28 $415 16 7 31 2 217 14 11 14 2013 15 23 -0 5 $207 58 $415 16 0 46 2 217 1 11 14 201315 24 -0 04491 $18 64 $415 16 0 05 2 196 9 11 14 2013 15 36 20 2 $8 386 23 $415 16 18 45 2 196 4 11 14 201315 36 -0 5 $207 58 $415 16 0 46 2 195 89 11 14 201315236 0 51 $211 73 $415 16 0 47 2 193 46 11 14 201315 36 2 4305 $1 009 05 $415 16 2 22 2 186 46 11 14 201315 36 7 $2 906 12 $415 16 6 4 2 185 85 11 14 2013 15 36 -0 60547 $251 37 $415 16 0 56 2 182 04 11 14 201315z36 380923 $1 581 44 $415 16 3 48 2 181 54 11 14 2013 15 37 0 5 $207 58 $415 16 0 46 2 178 54 11 14 201315 37 3 $1 245 48 $415 16 2 75 2 178 04 11 14 2013 15 38 -0 5 $207 58 $415 16 0 45 2 177 75 11 14 2013 15 38 -0 29502 $122 48 $415 16 0 27 2 177 41 11 14 2013 15 38 -0 33812 $140 37 $415 16 0 31 2 175 9 11 14 201315 38 4 51059 $627 14 $415 16 1 38 2 158 77 11 14 201315 39 17 1335 $7 113 16 $416 16 15 65 2 158 27 11 14 2013 15 40 0 5 $207 58 $415 16 0 46 2 152 05 11 14 201315 40 -6 21923 $2 581 98 $415 16 5 69 2 152 11 14 2013 15 40 0 04384 $18 20 $415 16 0 05 0 200 1015 2013 17 03 47 9994 33 0 2 199 5 11 15 201317 09 0 5 $214 06 $428 13 0 48 2 194 17 11 15 201317 09 -5 33415 $2 283 71 $428 13 5 03 2 163 96 11 15 201317 09 -30 2135 $12 935 32 $428 13 28 46 2 159 56 11 15 2013 17 09 4 4 $1 883 77 $428 13 3 77 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to 1 130 from Sales Type Balance Datetime Deposit Mhdraw BTC Purchase Said Purchase ETC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 123 59 11 15 2013 17 09 -35 97 $15 399 84 $428 13 30 8 2 111 98 11 15 2013 17 09 -11 6065 $4 969 10 $428 13 9 94 2 109 98 11 15 2013 17 09 -2 $856 26 $428 13 1 72 2 109 42 11 15 2013 17 10 0 56071 $240 06 $428 13 0 49 2 105 11 11 15 201317110 -4 31016 $1 845 31 $428 13 3 7 2 100 11 11 15 201317 10 -5 $2 140 65 $428 13 4 29 2 100 11 15 2013 17 10 0 10492 $44 92 $428 13 0 09 0 130 11 15 2013 17 47 29 9999 0 2 230 11 15 2013 22 07 100 $400 00 80 2 225 78 11 17 2013 0 29 4 22117 $1 848 87 $438 00 3 7 2 130 11 17 2013 0 30 -95 7788 $41 951 13 $438 00 83 91 0 162 11 17 2013 2 09 31 9999 0 0 211 11 18 2013 14 33 49 0 0 268 5 11 21 2013 19 37 57 4998 0 0 309 54 11 21 2013 19 37 41 0411 0 1 309 54 11 26 201313 04 0 86 4 0 366 54 11 26 2013 16 05 56 9998 0 2 317 11 26 2013 18 27 -49 5401 $41 861 38 $845 00 83 73 2 279 45 11 28 2013 12 10 37 5544 $37 554 36 $1 000 00 75 11 2 275 25 11 28 2013 12 10 -4 2 $4 200 00 $1 000 00 8 4 2 270 25 11 28 2013 12 10 -5 $5 000 00 $1 000 00 10 2 259 24 11 28 2013 12 10 -11 0075 $11 007 48 $1 000 00 22 02 2 217 11 28 2013 12 10 42 2382 $42 238 16 $1 000 00 84 48 0 265 5 11 28 2013 20 57 48 4993 0 0 310 5 11 29 2013 14 42 44 9998 0 2 210 5 11 29 2013 21 11 -100 $110 000 00 $1 100 00 220 2 232 32 12 01 2013 18 34 21 81291384 $950 00 41 45 2 233 12 12 01 2013 18 34 0 8 $760 00 $950 00 1 52 2 233 62 12 01 2013 18 34 0 5 $475 00 $950 00 0 95 2 234 62 12 01 2013 18 34 1 $950 00 $950 00 1 9 2 239 62 12 01 2013 18 34 5 $950 00 9 5 2 293 63 12 01 2013 18 34 54 01322617 $950 00 102 63 2 307 5 12 01 2013 18 34 13 86627786 $950 00 26 35 2 307 55 12 01 2013 18 34 0 05 $47 50 $950 00 0 1 2 308 54 12 01 2013 18 34 0 998 $948 10 $950 00 1 9 2 308 79 12 01 2013 18 34 0 25 $237 50 $950 00 0 48 2 310 5 12 01 2013 18 34 1 70958213 $950 00 3 25 2 317 04 12 01 2013 19 12 6 53299793 $835 00 10 92 2 360 5 12 01 2013 19 12 43 46700207 36 29495 $835 00 72 59 2 363 4 12 01 2013 23 04 2 897508 $965 00 5 6 2 378 07 12 01 2013 23 04 14 66904289 - $965 00 28 32 2 379 48 12 01 2013 23 04 1 40764285 $965 00 2 72 2 381 95 12 01 2013 23 05 2 474267 $965 00 4 78 2 418 06 12 01 2013 23 05 36 10733017 $965 00 69 69 2 422 22 12 01 2013 23 05 4 15796731 $965 00 8 03 2 425 25 12 01 2013 23 05 3 03473875 $965 00 5 86 2 433 48 12 01 2013 23 05 8 22535693 $965 00 15 88 2 439 94 12 01 2013 23 05 6 45931108 $965 00 12 47 2 440 94 12 01 2013 23 05 1 $965 00 $965 00 1 93 2 450 94 12 01 2013 23 05 10 $965 00 19 3 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily r BTC USD Used to USD from Sales ype Balance Datelime ETC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BT13 Sold Purchasa ETC of BTC Wires Dul BT13 Price FEE Notes 2 474 5 12 01 2013 23 05 2356683502 $965 00 45 49 2 460 67 12 02 2013 14 13 43 8287 $13 635 11 $986 00 27 28 2 460 57 12 02 2013 14 13 0 10803 $106 52 $986 00 0 22 2 449 43 12 02 201314 13 11 141 $10 985 03 $986 00 21 98 2 445 39 12 02 2013 14 13 4 03661 $3 980 10 $986 00 7 97 2 443 44 12 02 2013 14 13 -1 94756 $1 920 29 $986 00 3 85 2 374 94 12 02 2013 14 14 68 5049 $67 545 85 $986 00 135 1 2 361 59 12 02 2013 14 15 13 3453 $13 158 42 $986 00 26 32 2 360 91 12 02 2013 14 15 068324 $673 67 $986 00 1 35 2 344 85 12 02 2013 14 15 -16 0619 $15 837 01 $986 00 31 68 2 334 94 12 02 2013 14 15 -9 90774 $9 769 03 $986 00 19 54 2 301 53 12 02 2013 14 15 -33 4089 $32 941 16 $986 00 65 89 2 299 37 12 02 2013 14 15 2 15694 $2 126 74 $986 00 4 26 2 295 06 12 02 2013 14 15 4 31465 $4 254 24 $986 00 8 51 2 279 27 12 02 201314 15 -15 7913 $15 570 21 $986 00 31 15 2 274 5 12 02 2013 14 16 4 76331 $4 696 63 $986 00 9 4 2 276 01 12 05 2013 8 51 1 51053612 $950 00 2 88 2 286 01 12 05 2013 8 51 10 $950 00 19 2 287 1 12 05 2013 8 51 1 08645454 $950 00 2 07 2 296 84 12 05 2013 8 52 9 74273684 $950 00 18 52 2 301 84 12 05 2013 8 52 5 $950 00 9 5 2 348 16 12 05 2013 8 52 46 31604 $950 00 88 01 2 348 18 12 05 2013 8 52 0 02 $950 00 0 04 2 350 68 12 05 2013 8 52 2 5 132 375 $950 00 4 75 2 352 01 12 05 2013 8 52 133348379 $950 00 2 54 2 354 01 12 05 2013 8 52 2 2 900 001 $950 00 3 8 2 354 03 12 05 2013 8 52 0 02 'iI -i $950 00 0 04 2 356 01 12 05 2013 8152 1 98 Cl $950 00 3 77 2 356 51 12 05 2013 8 52 0 5 1 $950 00 0 95 2 357 11 12 05 2013 8 52 0 6001176 357 $950 00 1 15 2 372 14 12 05 2013 8 52 15 03227 $950 00 28 57 2 372 18 12 05 2013 8 52 0 0365777 $950 00 0 07 2 372 2 12 05 2013 8 52 0 02 $950 00 0 04 2 372 22 12 05 2013 8 52 0 023 $950 00 0 05 2 472 22 12 05 2013 8 52 100 $950 00 190 2 474 05 12 05 2013 8 52 1 823 $950 00 3 47 2 474 48 12 05 2013 8 52 043578334 $950 00 0 83 2 474 5 12 05 2013 8 52 0 02 $950 00 0 04 0 874 5 12 06 2013 3 03 400 0 2 864 85 12 07 2013 1 28 9 65217 $7 480 43 $775 00 14 97 2 862 35 12 07 2013 1 26 -2 5 $1 937 50 $775 00 3 88 2 853 65 12 07 2013 1 30 8 701 $6 743 28 $775 00 13 49 2 807 59 12 07 2013 2 18 46 0559 $35 693 31 $775 00 71 39 2 806 63 12 07 2013 2 18 096548 $748 25 $775 00 1 5 2 753 87 12 07 2013 2 19 52 7594 $40 888 54 $775 00 81 78 2 674 5 12 07 2013 2 20 -79 3661 $61 508 69 $775 00 123 02 2 670 98 12 10 2013 0 05 6 52285 $3 258 64 $925 00 6 52 2 689 48 12 10 2013 0 05 1 5 $1 387 50 $925 00 2 78 2 666 83 12 10 2013 0 05 2 64548 $2 447 07 $925 00 4 9 2 666 52 12 10 2013 0 05 0 31 $286 75 $925 00 0 58 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis USD Used to Daily BTC USU 1mm Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 646 52 12 10 2013 0 05 -20 $18 500 00 $925 00 37 2 610 89 12 10 2013 0 06 -35 6345 $32 961 89 $925 00 65 93 2 610 78 12 10 2013 0 06 -0 1077 $99 62 $925 00 0 2 2 605 78 12 10 2013 0 06 5 $4 625 00 $925 00 9 25 2 560 68 12 10 2013 0 06 -45 1 $41 717 50 $925 00 83 44 2 474 5 12 10 2013 0 06 86 1795 $79 716 03 $925 00 159 44 0 979 5 12 10 2013 23 36 505 0 2 985 47 12 11 2013 10 05 5 96900788 $895 00 10 69 2 995 97 12 11 2013 10 05 10 5 $895 00 18 8 2 1179 5 12 11 2013 10 05 183 5309921 $164 260 24 $895 00 328 53 2 1356 95 12 19 2013 16 51 177 4514061 $660 00 234 24 2 1358 52 12 19 2013 16 51 1 56188975 $660 00 2 07 2 1401 79 12 19 2013 16 52 4327658887 $660 00 57 13 2 1429 5 12 19 2013 16 52 27 71011532 $660 00 36 58 2 1410 48 12 19 2013 20 06 49 0256 $12 937 44 $680 00 25 88 2 1406 5 12 19 2013 20 06 -3 9774 $2 704 63 $680 00 5 41 2 1373 17 12 19 2013 20 07 33 3341 $22 667 22 $680 00 45 34 2 1373 16 12 19 2013 20 07 0 00535 $3 64 $680 00 0 01 2 1364 4 12 19 2013 20 07 -8 75726 $5 954 94 $680 00 11 91 2 1363 67 12 19 2013 20 07 0 73207 $497 81 $680 00 1 2 1179 5 12 19 2013 20 07 184 168 $125 234 33 $680 00 250 47 2 1194 87 12 20 2013 19 57 15 3685139 $640 00 19 68 2 1261 95 12 20 2013 20 00 67 08258157 $640 00 85 87 2 1272 18 12 20 2013 20 01 10 23043183 $640 00 13 1 2 1272 19 12 20 2013 20 01 0 006493 $640 00 0 01 2 1277 19 12 20 2013 20 01 5 $640 00 6 4 2 1279 19 12 20 2013 20 01 2 $640 00 2 56 2 1279 86 12 20 2013 20 01 0 66658783 $426 62 $640 00 0 86 2 1300 97 12 20 2013 20 02 21 11489405 $640 00 27 03 2 1301 12 20 2013 20 02 0 0289 $18 50 $640 00 0 04 2 1307 12 20 2013 20 02 6 $640 00 7 68 2 1317 12 20 2013 20 02 10 $640 00 12 8 2 1339 35 12 20 2013 20 02 22 3467777 $640 00 28 61 2 1340 35 12 20 2013 20 02 1 00690194 $644 42 $640 00 1 29 2 1361 08 12 20 2013 20 02 20 72339 $640 00 26 53 2 1364 08 12 20 2013 20 02 3 $640 00 3 84 2 1366 64 12 20 2013 20 02 2 56 $640 00 3 28 2 1370 64 12 20 2013 20 02 4 $640 00 5 12 2 1370 67 12 20 2013 20 02 0 0289 $18 50 $640 00 0 04 2 1380 67 12 20 2013 20 02 10 $640 00 12 8 2 1383 67 12 20 2013 20 02 3 $640 00 3 84 2 1393 67 12 20 2013 20 02 10 $640 00 12 8 2 1393 91 12 20 2013 20 03 0 24268132 $155 32 $640 00 0 32 2 1400 36 12 20 2013 20 03 6 44927 $640 00 8 26 2 1400 82 12 20 2013 20 03 0 4586923 $293 56 $640 00 0 59 2 1400 85 12 20 2013 20 03 0 0289 $18 50 $640 00 0 04 2 1403 13 12 20 2013 20 03 2 27991858 $640 00 2 92 2 1405 13 12 20 2013 20 03 2 $640 00 2 56 2 1413 53 12 20 2013 20 03 8 4077434 $640 00 10 77 2 1414 53 12 20 2013 20 03 1 $640 00 $640 00 1 28 Appendix CARL FORCE Account Analysis Daily ETC 080 Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw 870 Purchase BTC Sold Purchase ETC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 1414 73 1272072013 20 03 0 2004006 $126 20 $640 00 0 26 2 1424 83 1272072013 20 03 10 1 $640 00 1293 2 1426 44 1272072013 20 03 161003965 5640 00 2 07 2 1426 47 1272072013 20 03 0 0289 318 501 3640 00 0 04 2 1428 34 12 2072013 20 03 1 862206278110181 8640 00 2 39 2 1429 5 1272072013 20 03 1 16687579 $640 00 1 5 2 1179 5 12722 2013 8 23 -250 $172 500 00 $690 00 345 1 1010 12 22 2013 23 18 469 4989 0 2 1008 33 12 23 2013 0 42 4 67808 $1 060 55 $632 00 2 13 2 1003 33 12 23 2013 0 42 4 99282 $3 155 46 $632 00 6 32 2 953 77 12 23 2013 1 19 49 5655 $31 325 39 $632 00 62 66 2 953 76 12 23 2013 1 19 -0 00581 $3 67 $632 00 0 01 2 952 73 12 23 2013 1 19 4 0292 $650 45 $632 00 1 31 2 952 08 12 23 2013 1 19 0 65 $410 80 $632 00 0 83 2 950 13 12 23 2013 1 20 4 94771 $1 230 95 $632 00 2 47 2 950 05 12 23 2013 2 13 008737 $55 22 $632 00 0 12 2 948 61 12 23 2013 2 13 4 43518 $907 03 $632 00 1 82 2 948 41 12 23 2013 2 13 0 2 $126 40 $632 00 0 26 2 926 31 12 23 2013 2 13 221 $13 967 20 $632 00 27 94 2 926 24 12 23 2013 2 13 007427 $46 94 $632 00 0 1 2 925 51 12 23 2013 2 13 -0 73261 $463 01 $632 00 0 93 2 847 35 12 23 2013 2 13 -78 1528 $49 392 56 $632 00 98 79 2 847 16 12 23 2013 2 14 019282 $121 86 $632 00 0 25 2 818 43 12 23 2013 2 14 28 7301 $18 157 42 $632 00 36 32 2 818 23 12 23 2013 2 14 $126 40 $632 00 0 26 2 814 22 12 23 2013 2 14 4 00552 $2 531 49 $632 00 5 07 2 808 22 12 23 2013 2 14 -6 $3 792 00 $632 00 7 59 2 806 22 12 23 2013 2 14 2 $1 264 00 $632 00 2 53 2 803 48 12 23 2013 2 14 27433 $1 733 76 $632 00 3 47 2 803 25 12 23 2013 2 14 0 23 $145 36 $632 00 0 3 2 802 94 12 23 2013 2 14 -0 315 $199 08 $632 00 0 4 2 771 94 12 23 2013 2 14 -31 $19 592 00 $632 00 39 19 2 771 71 12 23 2013 2 14 022576 $142 68 $632 00 0 29 2 761 71 12 23 2013 2 14 40 $6 320 00 $632 00 12 64 2 761 48 12 23 2013 2 14 -0 23 $145 36 $632 00 0 3 2 761 17 12 23 2013 2 14 40 311 $196 55 $632 00 0 4 2 760 86 12 23 2013 2 14 0 307 $194 02 $632 00 0 39 2 760 85 12 23 2013 2 14 0 01 $6 32 $632 00 0 02 2 760 8 12 23 2013 2 14 40 05 $31 60 $632 00 0 07 2 735 82 12 23 2013 2 15 24 9813 $15 788 15 $632 00 31 58 2 735 82 12 23 2013 2 15 -0 00315 $1 99 $632 00 0 01 2 714 22 12 23 2013 2 15 -21 6022 $13 652 60 $632 00 27 31 2 710 12 23 2013 2 15 4 21156 $2 661 71 $632 00 5 33 2 971 21 12 27 2013 2 10 261 2074141 151 92 711 07 $738 00 385 55 2 971 35 12 27 2013 2 12 0 1369616 15101 00 $738 00 0 21 2 971 38 12 27 2013 2 13 003199572 323 61 $738 00 0 05 2 973 64 12 27 2013 2 13 226429855 $738 00 3 35 2 973 69 12 27 2013 2 13 004269106 33 I $738 00 0 07 2 974 86 12 27 2013 2 15 1 17309414 115005 741 $738 00 1 74 2 1010 12 27 2013 2 15 3514354486 $738 00 51 88 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to 080 from Sales Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase ETC 801d Purchase BTC 01' ETC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 1082 78 1272972013 21 46 7278043526 552 693 0411 5724 00 105 39 2 1088 66 12 29 2013 21 48 587132586 84 250 6724 00 8 51 2 1091 64 12 29 2013 21 48 2 982 152158 071 $724 00 4 32 2 1104 69 12 29 2013 21 49 13 05119 159 440 0111 $724 00 18 9 2 1110 12 29 2013 22 07 5 31504888 1 32 848 11 $724 00 7 7 2 1106 13 12 30 2013 1 57 8 87264 $2 848 39 $735 00 5 7 2 1105 13 12 30 2013 1 58 1 $735 00 $735 00 1 47 2 1090 87 12 30 2013 1 58 14 2596 $10 480 78 $735 00 20 97 2 1089 87 12 30 2013 1 58 -1 $735 00 $735 00 1 47 2 1089 67 12 30 20131 58 $147 00 $735 00 0 3 2 1088 67 12 30 2013 1 58 1 $735 00 $735 00 1 47 2 1088 67 12 30 2013 1 58 0 00679 $4 99 $735 00 0 01 2 1087 41 12 30 2013 1 58 1 25759 $924 33 $735 00 1 85 2 1082 41 12 30 2013 1 58 -5 $3 675 00 $735 00 7 35 2 1070 91 12 30 20131 58 11 5 $8 452 50 $735 00 16 91 2 1021 21 12 30 2013 2 00 49 6936 $36 524 79 $735 00 73 05 2 1021 21 12 30 2013 2 00 0 00317 $2 33 $735 00 0 01 2 1021 2 12 30 2013 2 00 0 00679 $4 99 $735 00 0 01 2 1015 9 12 30 2013 2 32 5 301 8 $3 896 82 $735 00 7 8 2 1010 12 30 2013 2 32 5 89806 $4 335 08 $735 00 8 68 2 1155 83 12 31 2013 1 54 1458247988 $725 00 211 45 2 1260 12 31 20131154 104 1752012 $725 00 151 06 2 1250 01 01 20141 57 10 $7 420 00 $742 00 14 84 2 1081 62 01 01 20141 57 468 386 $124 942 71 $742 00 249 89 2 71076 62 01 01 2014 1 58 -4 99389 $3 705 46 $742 00 7 42 2 1073 42 01 01 2014 1 58 3 2001 $2 374 47 $742 00 4 75 2 1010 01 01 2014 2 01 -63 4196 $47 057 35 $742 00 94 12 2 869 37 01 02 2014 19 05 440 63 $108 003 79 $768 00 216 01 2 869 16 01 02 2014 19 05 -0 21 $161 28 $768 00 0 33 2 865 76 01 02 2014 19 05 3 4 $2 611 20 $768 00 5 23 2 860 63 01 02 2014 19 05 5 12956 $3 939 50 $768 00 7 88 2 856 21 01 02 2014 19 06 4 41995 $3 394 52 $768 00 6 79 2 855 22 01 02 2014 19 06 -0 9994 $767 54 $768 00 1 54 2 854 1 11 02 2014 19 06 1 12 $860 16 $768 00 1 73 2 844 53 01 02 2014 19 06 9 57 $7 349 76 $768 00 14 7 2 834 54 01 02 2014 19 06 9 9851 $7 668 56 $768 00 15 34 2 802 15 01 02 2014 19 06 32 3901 $24 875 62 $768 00 49 76 2 796 95 01 02 2014 19 07 -5 1969 $3 991 22 $768 00 7 99 2 779 41 01 02 2014 19 26 17 5415 $13 471 91 $768 00 26 95 2 771 31 01 02 2014 19 26 8 09862 $6 219 74 $768 00 12 44 2 765 56 01 02 2014 19 38 5 7511 $4 416 84 $768 00 8 84 2 760 56 01 02 2014 19 38 5 $3 840 00 $768 00 7 68 2 738 98 01 02 201419 38 21 58 $16 573 44 $768 00 33 15 2 738 72 01 02 2014 19 39 -0 26042 $200 00 $768 00 0 4 2 734 72 01 02 2014 19 39 -4 $3 072 00 $768 00 6 15 2 730 61 01 02 2014 19 39 4 10776 $3 154 76 $768 00 6 31 2 730 41 01 02 201419 39 -0 2 $153 60 $768 00 0 31 2 712 99 01 02 201419239 47 425 $13 382 40 $768 00 26 77 2 710 01 02 2014 19 39 2 98458 $2 292 16 $768 00 4 59 2 723 54 01 03 2014 16 28 13 54031583 $802 00 21 72 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USU Used to USD from Sales ype Baianca Datelime BTC Deposit Withdraw ETC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of ETC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 723 64 01 03 2014 16 28 0 1 550 20 - 580200 0 17 2 1010 31 03 2014 18 52 2863596842 240 660 47 5802 00 459 33 2 997 47 31 04 2014 16 12 42 5357 $10 216 56 $815 00 20 44 2 997 37 01 04 201416 12 -0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 997 27 01 04 201416212 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 986 66 01 04 2014 16 12 10 6061 $8 643 95 $815 00 17 29 2 984 78 01 04 2014 16 12 4 87975 $1 532 00 $815 00 3 07 2 984 68 01 04 201416 12 40 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 983 19 01 04 201416 13 -1 49494 $1 218 38 $815 00 2 44 2 983 09 01 04 201416 13 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 982 55 01 04 2014 16 13 0 53806 $438 52 $815 00 0 88 2 982 45 01 04 201416213 -0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 982 35 01 04 201416z13 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 982 25 01 04 201416 13 -0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 982 23 01 04 201416 13 0 02008 $16 37 $815 00 0 04 2 982 2 01 04 201416 13 -0 027 $22 00 $815 00 0 05 2 982 1 01 04 201416 14 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 952 1 01 04 2014 16 14 -30 $24 450 00 $815 00 48 9 2 952 01 04 201416214 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 890 7 01 04 2014 16 14 61 3039 $49 962 68 $815 00 99 93 2 890 6 01 04 201416z14 -0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 888 8 01 04 201416 14 -1 8 $1 467 00 $815 00 2 94 2 877 45 01 04 201416 14 -11 35 $9 250 25 $815 00 18 51 2 876 14 01 04 201416 14 -1 31217 $1 069 42 $815 00 2 14 2 876 04 01 04 201416 14 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 875 94 01 04 201416 14 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 875 25 01 04 2014 16 14 0 68844 $561 08 $815 00 1 13 2 874 25 01 04 2014 16 14 1 $815 00 $815 00 1 63 2 848 82 01 04 2014 16 14 25 4294 $20 724 93 $815 00 41 45 2 848 72 01 04 201416214 -0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 762 72 01 04 201416 14 86 $70 090 00 $815 00 140 18 2 762 62 01 04 201416 14 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 758 5 01 04 201416 14 4 11842 $3 356 51 $815 00 6 72 2 752 22 01 04 2014 16 14 6 28412 $5 121 56 $815 00 10 25 2 752 12 01 04 201416 14 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 744 8 01 04 201416 14 7 32 $5 965 80 $815 00 11 94 2 742 72 01 04 201416 14 2 07218 $1 688 83 $815 00 3 38 2 742 62 01 04 201416 14 0 1 $81 50 $815 00 0 17 2 712 62 01 04 2014 16 14 30 $24 450 00 $815 00 48 9 2 710 01 04 201416 14 2 61984 $2 135 17 $815 00 4 28 2 709 83 01 05 2014 12 41 -0 1768 $149 40 $845 00 0 3 2 705 1 01 05 2014 12 41 4 72256 $3 990 57 $845 00 7 99 2 705 06 01 05 2014 12 41 0 04 $33 80 $845 00 0 0 2 704 74 01 05 2014 12 41 -0 32189 $272 00 $845 00 0 55 2 702 74 01 05 2014 12 42 -2 $1 690 00 $845 00 3 38 2 702 7 01 05 2014 12 42 0 04 $33 80 $845 00 0 07 2 702 66 01 05 2014 12 42 -0 04 $33 80 $845 00 0 07 2 702 62 01 05 2014 12 43 0 04 $33 80 $845 00 0 07 2 692 62 01 05 2014 12 43 -10 $8 450 00 $845 00 16 9 2 690 62 01 05 2014 12 43 -2 $1 690 00 $845 00 3 38 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Anaiysis Daily ETC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Baiance Dahetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BT Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 690 52 0110512014 12 43 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 690 42 0110512014 12 43 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 690 32 0110512014 12 43 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 690 28 0110512014 12 43 -0 04 $33 80 $845 00 0 07 2 690 18 0110512014 12 43 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 1 2 690 08 0110512014 12 43 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 689 98 0110512014 12 43 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 689 88 0110512014 12 43 0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 689 78 0110512014 12 43 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 689 68 0110512014 12 43 0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 689 41 0110512014 12 43 -0 27256 $230 33 $845 00 0 47 2 689 31 0110512014 12 43 0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 689 24 0110512014 12 43 -0 06592 $55 70 $845 00 0 12 2 689 18 0110512014 12 43 0 06592 $55 70 $845 00 0 12 2 689 17 0110512014 12 43 -0 01 $8 45 $845 00 0 02 2 689 16 0110512014 12 43 -0 01 $8 45 $845 00 0 02 2 689 09 0110512014 12 43 006592 $55 70 $845 00 0 12 2 689 03 0110512014 12 43 0 06592 $55 70 $845 00 0 12 2 689 02 0110512014 12 43 -0 01 $8 45 $845 00 0 02 2 688 92 0110512014 12 44 10 0924 $78 08 $845 00 0 16 2 688 83 0110512014 12 44 -0 0924 $78 08 $845 00 0 16 2 688 74 0110512014 12 44 -0 0924 $78 08 $845 00 0 16 2 688 65 0110512014 12 44 0 0924 $78 08 $845 00 0 16 2 688 55 0110512014 12 44 -0 0924 $78 08 $845 00 0 16 2 688 46 0110512014 12 44 0 0924 $78 08 $845 00 0 16 2 688 37 0110512014 12 44 -0 0924 $78 08 $845 00 0 16 2 685 83 0110512014 12 44 -2 53812 $2 144 71 $845 00 4 29 2 675 83 0110512014 12 44 -10 $8 450 00 $845 00 16 9 2 675 73 0110512014 12 44 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 675 63 0110512014 12 44 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 675 53 0110512014 12 44 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 675 43 0110512014 12 44 0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 675 33 0110512014 12 44 0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 675 23 0110512014 12 44 -0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 674 77 0110512014 12 44 -0 465 $392 92 $845 00 0 79 2 674 73 0110512014 12 44 0 04 $33 80 $845 00 0 07 2 674 63 01105120141244 0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 674 53 0110512014 12 44 0 1 $84 50 $845 00 0 17 2 673 59 0110512014 12 44 0 93827 $792 84 $845 00 1 59 2 655 42 0110512014 12 45 48 1684 $15 352 34 $845 00 30 71 2 655 38 0110512014 12 45 -0 04 $33 80 $845 00 0 07 2 652 38 0110512014 12 45 -3 $2 535 00 $845 00 5 07 2 649 38 0110512014 12 45 3 $2 535 00 $845 00 5 07 2 649 34 0110512014 12 45 0 04 $33 80 $845 00 0 07 2 644 34 0110512014 12 45 5 $4 225 00 $845 00 8 45 2 643 92 0110512014 12 45 0 418 $353 21 $845 00 0 71 2 643 51 0110512014 12 45 0 415 $350 68 $845 00 0 71 2 434 52 0110512014 12 45 208 983 $176 591 05 $845 00 353 19 2 360 0110512014 12 45 -74 5194 $62 968 85 $845 00 125 94 2 390 05 0110612014 18 27 30 04616398 $935 00 56 19 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC 080 Used to from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Said Purchase BTC 01 BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 390 25 01 06 2014 18 27 0 2 $187 00 $935 00 0 38 2 390 41 01 06 2014 18 27 0 16 $149 60 $935 00 0 3 2 409 01 01 06 2014 18 28 18 6 $935 00 34 79 2 410 51 01 06 2014 18 29 1 5 $935 00 2 81 2 437 24 01 06 2014 18 36 26 73059564 $935 00 49 99 2 455 6 01 06 2014 18 37 18 35667325 $935 00 34 33 2 460 01 06 2014 18 37 4 40656713 $935 00 8 25 2 485 13 01 07 2014 19 18 2512621229 $824 00 41 41 2 486 11 01 07 2014 19 18 0981901305 $809 09 $824 00 1 62 2 488 11 01 07 2014 19 18 2 $824 00 3 3 2 489 3 01 07 2014 19 18 1 18903226 979 76 $824 00 1 96 2 508 97 01 07 2014 21 43 19 66440521 $824 00 32 41 2 508 97 01 07 2014 21 43 0 00265 $824 00 0 01 2 515 81 01 07 2014 21 44 6 84408879 @3953 $824 00 11 28 2 520 04 01 07 2014 21 44 4 2298 $824 00 6 98 2 520 04 01 07 2014 21 44 0 0026 $824 00 0 01 2 524 94 01 07 2014 21 44 4 9 $824 00 8 08 2 524 95 01 07 2014 21 44 0 00267 $824 00 0 01 2 524 95 01 07 2014 21 44 0 00269 $824 00 0 01 2 525 45 01 07 2014 21 44 0 5 $412 00 $824 00 0 83 2 525 45 01 07 2014 21 44 0 0027 $824 00 0 01 2 526 44 01 07 2014 21 44 0 988 $814 11 $824 00 1 63 2 552 44 01 07 2014 21 44 26 $824 00 42 85 2 564 44 01 07 2014 21 45 12 $824 00 19 78 2 574 44 01 07 2014 21 45 10 $824 00 16 48 2 605 85 01 07 2014 21 45 31 41154777 $824 00 51 77 2 606 85 01 07 2014 21 45 1 $824 00 $824 00 1 65 2 608 05 01 07 2014 21 45 1 2 $988 80 $824 00 1 98 2 626 88 01 07 2014 21 45 18 82401 $824 00 31 03 2 637 01 01 07 2014 21 45 10 13 $824 00 16 7 2 662 83 01 07 2014 21 45 25 82507353 $824 00 42 56 2 680 46 01 07 2014 21 45 17 63244897 $824 00 29 06 2 681 35 01 07 2014 21 45 0 89 $733 36 $824 00 1 47 2 681 85 01 07 2014 21 45 0 49999 $411 99 $824 00 0 83 2 681 9 01 07 2014 21 45 0 05 $41 20 $824 00 0 09 2 701 9 01 07 2014 21 45 20 $824 00 32 96 2 702 01 07 2014 21 45 0 0999999 $82 40 $824 00 0 17 2 702 05 01 07 2014 21 45 0 05 $41 20 $824 00 0 09 2 702 1 01 07 2014 21 45 0 04409 $36 33 $824 00 0 08 2 705 3 01 07 2014 21 45 3 204 $824 00 5 29 2 807 9 01 07 2014 21 46 102 5974 $824 00 169 09 2 808 39 01 07 2014 21 48 0 494052 @0110 $824 00 0 82 2 808 79 01 07 2014 21 46 0 3999999 $329 60 $824 00 0 68 2 808 82 01 07 2014 21 46 0 03 $24 72 $824 00 0 05 2 809 22 01 07 2014 21 46 0 3999999 $329 60 $824 00 0 66 2 809 27 01 07 2014 21 46 0 05 $41 20 $824 00 0 09 2 809 77 01 07 2014 21 46 0 49999 $411 99 $824 00 0 83 2 810 01 07 2014 21 46 0 23084043 $190 21 $824 00 0 39 1 810 01 10 201413 04 0 - 51 64 1 790 01 10 2014 17 24 -20 - 0 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USU Used to USD from Sales Type BalanCe Date-lime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase ETC of BT13 Wires Out ETC Price FEE Notes 1 790 0 540 055 1101 8- 45 2 791 7 11 18 2014 15 54 1 7 51 858 30 3799 00 2 72 2 810 63 11 18 2014 16 01 1892660967 1815 112236 5799 00 30 25 2 814 18 01 18 2014 16 02 355330179 52 83009 8790 00 5 68 2 814 74 01 16 2014 16 04 055126889 $440 46 $799 00 0 89 2 814 83 01 18 2014 16 05 0 0918625 $73 40 $790 00 0 15 2 890 11 18 2014 16 30 7517695715 8799 00 120 14 2 848 8 11 19 2014 14 43 -41 2069 $33 789 69 $820 00 67 58 2 832 41 01 19 2014 14 43 46 3866 $13 437 00 $820 00 26 88 2 827 47 01 19 2014 14 43 4 93619 $4 047 67 $820 00 8 1 2 813 09 01 19 2014 14 43 14 3824 $11 793 54 $820 00 23 59 2 808 09 01 19 201414143 5 $4 100 00 $820 00 8 2 2 807 09 01 19 201414 43 1 $820 00 $820 00 1 64 2 794 1 01 19 201414143 -12 9899 $10 651 70 $820 00 21 31 2 790 01 19 2014 14 43 4 09805 $3 360 41 $820 00 6 73 2 990 01 22 2014 11 21 200 000 1 '11 $810 00 324 1 890 01 23 2014 13 07 100 33- 0 1 790 01 23 201413 14 100 0 2 756 1 01 25 2014 17 15 33 9083 $27 126 61 $800 00 54 26 2 753 1 01 25 201417 16 3 $2 400 00 $800 00 4 8 2 752 1 01 25 201417 16 1 $800 00 $800 00 1 6 2 744 6 01 25 2014 17 16 7 49631 $5 997 05 $800 00 12 2 744 35 01 25 2014 17 16 -0 25 $200 00 $800 00 0 4 2 742 35 01 25 201417116 2 $1 600 00 $800 00 3 2 2 741 81 01 25 2014 17 16 0 53876 $431 01 $800 00 0 87 2 741 56 01 25 2014 17 17 0 249 $199 20 $800 00 0 4 2 616 55 01 25 201417 17 -125 01 $100 008 00 $800 00 200 02 2 616 53 01 25 201417217 002164 $17 31 $800 00 0 04 2 611 53 01 25 201417z17 5 $4 000 00 $800 00 8 2 606 46 01 25 201417 17 -5 07135 $4 057 08 $800 00 8 12 2 606 14 -0 32295 $258 36 $800 00 0 52 2 605 63 01 25 2014 17 17 -0 50445 $403 56 $800 00 0 81 2 605 13 01 25 2014 17 17 0 5 $400 00 $800 00 0 8 2 604 13 01 25 201417217 -1 $800 00 $800 00 1 6 2 603 66 01 25 2014 17 18 0 476 $380 80 $800 00 0 77 2 591 99 01 25 201417 18 -11 6636 $9 330 89 $800 00 18 67 2 588 54 01 25 2014 17 18 45 44894 $2 759 15 $800 00 5 52 2 584 54 01 25 2014 17 18 4 $3 200 00 $800 00 6 4 2 513 68 01 25 2014 17 18 70 8616 $56 689 28 $800 00 113 38 2 511 56 01 25 201417118 -2 12419 $1 699 35 $800 00 3 4 2 508 56 01 25 2014 17 18 -8 $2 400 00 $800 00 4 8 2 505 86 01 25 201417118 -2 69488 $2 155 90 $800 00 4 32 2 503 26 01 25 2014 17 18 2 6 $2 080 00 $800 00 14 16 2 501 26 01 25 2014 17 18 2 $1 600 00 $800 00 3 2 2 496 19 01 25 2014 17 18 -5 07557 $4 060 46 $800 00 8 13 2 495 52 01 25 2014 17 18 0 66698 $533 58 $800 00 1 07 2 494 52 01 25 2014 17 18 1 $800 00 $800 00 1 6 2 490 4 51552 $3 612 42 $800 00 7 23 2 777 57 01 27 201418z41 287 5651993 $785 00 451 48 2 780 46 01 27 2014 18 45 2 89357067 $785 00 4 55 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales ype Balance Datetime ETC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of ETC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 780 95 01 27 2014 18 46 048694503 3332 251 3785 00 0 77 2 783 58 01 27 2014 18 46 2 8314813 52 065711 $785 00 4 14 2 790 01 27 2014 18 46 642280374 85 041 3785 00 10 09 2 588 08 01 27 2014 22 21 -221 923 $157 996 02 $757 00 336 2 567 91 01 27 2014 22 21 40 1702 $128 84 $757 00 0 26 2 555 26 01 27 2014 22 21 -12 6525 $9 577 94 $757 00 19 16 2 551 01 01 27 2014 22 21 425 $3 217 25 $757 00 6 44 2 516 01 01 27 2014 22 22 -35 $26 495 00 $757 00 52 99 2 515 21 01 27 2014 22 22 079466 $601 55 $757 00 1 21 2 511 21 01 27 2014 22 22 4 $3 028 00 $757 00 8 06 2 502 51 01 27 2014 22 22 8 7 $6 585 90 $757 00 13 18 2 490 51 01 27 2014 22 22 12 $9 084 00 $757 00 18 17 2 490 01 27 2014 22 22 -0 50924 $385 49 $757 00 0 78 2 490 18 01 27 2014 23 28 0 1795423 $727 91 0 27 2 494 18 01 27 2014 23 28 4 $728 00 5 83 2 500 7 01 27 2014 23 28 8 51840952 $728 00 9 5 2 501 23 01 27 2014 23 28 0 52429304 $728 00 0 77 2 573 53 01 27 2014 23 28 72 30268508 $728 00 105 28 2 581 95 01 28 2014 1 02 8 42116813 $747 00 12 59 1 481 95 01 28 2014 2 01 -100 0 2 690 01 28 2014 5 44 208 0539019 $747 00 310 84 0 909 5 01 31 2014 5 16 219 5 0 2 662 86 01 31 2014 18 53 246 646 $199 289 68 $808 00 398 58 2 638 7 02 02 2014 7 56 24 1567 $19 929 27 $825 00 39 86 2 638 18 02 02 2014 7 56 051806 $427 40 $825 00 0 86 2 620 65 02 02 2014 7 57 17 537 $14 468 04 $825 00 28 94 2 615 15 02 02 2014 7 57 55 $4 537 50 $825 00 9 08 2 614 63 02 02 2014 7 58 051806 $427 40 $825 00 0 86 2 600 48 02 02 2014 8 00 44 1522 $11 675 58 $825 00 23 36 2 580 91 02 02 2014 8 00 -19 5667 $18 142 49 $825 00 32 29 2 462 86 02 02 2014 8 00 418 051 $97 392 35 $825 00 194 79 2 501 39 02 04 2014 9 55 38 53189607 $800 00 81 66 2 580 74 02 04 2014 9 58 79 35075207 $800 00 126 97 2 695 5 02 04 2014 9 58 114 76299 $800 00 183 83 2 709 5 02 04 2014 9 58 14 $800 00 22 4 2 1034 5 02 05 2014 19 29 325 $800 00 520 2 1034 48 02 06 2014 1 12 0 02 $15 53 $776 60 0 04 2 1034 42 02 06 2014 1 12 00677 $52 60 $777 00 0 11 2 1034 29 02 06 2014 1 12 01278 $99 40 $777 78 0 2 2 1034 03 02 06 2014 1 12 -0 263 $204 38 $777 11 0 41 2 1033 76 02 06 2014 1 12 0 263 $204 21 $776 46 0 41 2 1033 28 02 08 2014 1 12 048178 $374 72 $777 77 0 75 2 1032 8 02 06 2014 1 12 0 4824 $374 72 $776 77 0 75 2 1032 3 02 06 2014 1 12 0 5 $388 50 $777 00 0 78 2 1031 68 02 06 2014 1 12 061983 $482 10 $777 79 0 97 2 1021 88 02 06 20141 12 -10 $7 772 00 $777 20 15 55 2 1000 6 02 06 20141 12 21 0785 $16 394 20 $777 77 32 79 2 950 6 02 06 2014 1 12 -50 $38 851 00 $777 02 77 71 2 950 58 02 06 2014 1 12 0 02 $15 52 $776 10 0 04 2 950 18 02 06 20141 12 -0 4 $310 45 $776 13 0 83 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BT13 USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balanca Datetime ETC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 949 68 12 06 2014 1 12 05 $368 12 $776 23 0 78 2 949 05 02 06 2014 1 12 062894 $488 08 $776 03 0 98 2 946 72 02 06 2014 1 12 -2 33168 $1 809 62 $776 10 3 62 2 944 37 02 06 2014 1 12 -2 34771 $1 821 87 $776 02 3 65 2 941 72 02 06 2014 1 12 2 64832 $2 055 36 $776 10 4 12 2 936 72 02 06 2014 1 12 5 $3 880 05 $776 01 7 77 2 929 89 02 06 2014 1 12 683765 $5 306 16 $776 02 10 62 2 921 28 02 06 2014 1 12 860508 $6 677 54 $776 00 13 36 2 876 28 02 06 2014 1 12 45 $34 920 00 $776 00 69 84 2 876 07 02 06 2014 1 12 -0 21346 $165 64 $776 00 0 34 2 875 57 02 06 2014 1 12 0 5 $388 00 $776 00 0 78 2 874 57 02 06 2014 1 12 -1 $776 00 $776 00 1 56 2 867 73 02 06 2014 1 13 6 83765 $5 306 02 $776 00 10 62 2 867 72 02 06 2014 1 13 -0 01 $7 76 $776 00 0 02 2 855 04 02 06 2014 1 13 -12 6792 $9 839 03 $776 00 19 68 2 434 5 02 06 2014 1 13 420 536 $326 336 21 $776 00 652 68 2 1034 5 02 06 2014 7 32 600 $766 00 919 2 2 979 41 02 06 2014 13 37 55 0905 $43 521 46 $790 00 87 05 2 807 6 02 06 2014 21 57 171 81 $131 606 83 $766 00 263 22 2 807 09 02 06 2014 21 58 051365 $393 45 $766 00 0 79 2 801 96 02 06 2014 21 59 -5 12616 $3 926 64 $766 00 7 86 2 801 9 02 06 2014 21 59 006794 $52 04 $766 00 0 11 2 801 69 02 06 2014 21 59 020699 $158 55 $766 00 0 32 2 799 82 02 06 2014 21 59 1 871 $1 433 19 $766 00 2 87 2 798 74 02 06 2014 21 59 -1 07524 $823 63 $766 00 1 65 2 648 74 02 06 2014 22 00 -150 $114 900 00 $766 00 229 8 2 630 67 02 06 2014 22 00 18 0765 $13 846 61 $766 00 27 7 2 630 61 02 06 2014 22 00 -0 0514 $39 37 $766 00 0 08 2 629 61 02 06 2014 22 00 1 $766 00 $766 00 1 54 2 562 85 02 06 2014 22 00 -66 763 $51 140 42 $766 00 102 29 2 562 72 02 06 2014 22 00 0 13 $99 58 $766 00 0 2 2 557 72 02 06 2014 22 00 5 $3 830 00 $766 00 7 66 2 555 92 02 06 2014 22 00 -1 8 $1 378 80 $766 00 2 76 2 490 77 02 06 2014 22 00 65 1551 $49 908 81 $786 00 99 82 2 479 59 02 06 2014 22 00 11 1753 $8 560 25 $766 00 17 13 2 423 41 02 06 2014 22 00 456 1773 $43 031 82 $766 00 86 07 2 475 1 02 06 2014 23 49 51 68905747 $762 00 78 78 2 477 49 02 06 2014 23 49 2 38807176 $762 00 3 64 2 477 54 02 06 2014 23 49 0 05 $762 00 0 08 2 478 43 02 06 2014 23 50 0 88927 $762 00 1 36 2 478 5 02 06 2014 23 52 0 0740176 $762 00 0 12 2 1028 5 02 07 2014 2 52 550 $735 00 808 5 2 1028 14 02 07 2014 9 45 036378 $248 90 $684 21 0 5 2 1027 74 02 07 2014 9 45 -O 404 $275 93 $683 00 0 56 2 1027 29 02 07 2014 9 45 0 45 $307 89 $684 21 0 62 2 1026 92 02 07 2014 9 45 036378 $248 46 $683 00 0 5 2 1026 91 02 07 2014 9 45 0 01 $6 83 $683 00 0 02 2 1026 86 02 07 2014 9 45 -0 05 $34 15 $683 00 0 07 2 1028 41 02 07 2014 9 45 -0 45 $307 35 $683 00 0 62 2 1026 23 02 07 2014 9 45 90 18076 $123 46 $683 00 0 25 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 1025 73 02 07 2014 9 45 -0 5002 $341 64 $683 00 0 69 2 1025 53 02 07 2014 9 45 -0 2 $136 60 $683 00 0 28 2 1025 52 02 07 2014 9 45 -0 01 $6 83 $683 00 0 02 2 1025 5 02 07 2014 9 45 -0 02 $13 66 $683 00 0 03 2 1025 05 02 07 2014 9 45 0 45 $307 35 $683 00 0 62 2 102439 02 07 2014 9 45 -0 658 $449 41 $683 00 0 9 2 1024 38 02 07 2014 9 45 -0 01 $6 83 $683 00 0 02 2 1022 38 02 07 2014 9 45 2 $1 366 00 $683 00 2 74 2 1021 93 02 07 2014 9 45 -0 45 $307 35 $683 00 0 62 2 1021 73 02 07 2014 9 57 -0 2 $136 60 $683 00 0 28 2 968 39 02 07 2014 9 57 -53 3428 $36 433 16 $683 00 72 87 2 967 89 02 07 2014 10 04 -0 5 $340 00 $680 00 0 68 2 895 61 02 07 2014 10 04 72 2762 $49 147 84 $680 00 98 3 2 894 91 02 07 2014 10 05 -0 7 $478 00 $680 00 0 96 2 893 64 02 07 2014 10 05 4 27578 $867 53 $680 00 1 74 2 889 64 02 07 2014 10 05 -4 0002 $2 720 14 $680 00 5 45 2 869 52 02 07 2014 10 05 20 1142 $13 677 64 $680 00 27 36 2 869 42 02 07 2014 10 05 -0 103 $70 04 $680 00 0 15 2 860 51 02 07 2014 10 05 -8 90969 $6 058 59 $680 00 12 12 2 800 03 02 07 2014 10 05 -60 4864 $41 130 77 $680 00 82 27 2 790 13 02 07 2014 10 05 -9 9 $6 732 00 $680 00 13 47 2 790 02 02 07 2014 10 05 0 10243 $69 65 - $680 00 0 14 2 789 79 02 07 2014 10 05 -0 22901 $155 73 $680 00 0 32 2 719 34 02 07 2014 10 05 -70 4565 $47 910 39 $680 00 95 83 2 715 34 02 07 2014 10 05 4 $2 720 00 $680 00 5 44 2 710 34 02 07 2014 10 06 5 $3 400 00 $680 00 6 8 2 704 2 02 07 2014 10 06 613676 $4 173 00 $680 00 8 35 2 688 61 02 07 2014 10 06 -15 59 $10 601 20 $680 00 21 21 2 666 53 02 07 2014 10 15 -22 0818 $15 015 64 $680 00 30 04 2 663 13 02 07 2014 10 15 3 40014 $2 312 10 $680 00 4 63 2 659 05 02 07 2014 10 16 4 08096 $2 775 05 $680 00 5 56 2 659 02 02 07 2014 10 16 -0 025 $17 00 $680 00 0 04 2 354 51 02 07 2014 10 16 -304 514 $207 069 85 $680 00 414 14 2 155 51 02 07 2014 10 16 -199 $135 320 00 $680 00 270 64 2 150 51 02 07 2014 10 16 -5 $3 400 00 $680 00 6 8 2 146 76 02 07 2014 10 16 3 74571 $2 547 08 $680 00 5 1 2 145 77 02 07 2014 10 16 0 99582 $677 16 $680 00 1 36 2 138 42 02 07 2014 10 16 -7 35 $4 998 00 $680 00 10 2 138 39 02 07 2014 10 16 -0 025 $17 00 $680 00 0 04 2 130 49 02 07 2014 10 16 -7 89947 $5 371 64 $680 00 10 75 2 118 93 02 07 2014 10 16 11 5628 $7 862 72 $680 00 15 73 2 106 1 02 07 2014 10 16 42 8301 $8 724 43 $680 00 17 45 2 10 02 07 2014 10 16 96 0951 $65 344 70 $680 00 130 69 2 36 79 02 07 2014 16 36 26 79045955 $725 00 38 85 2 51 79 32 07 2014 16 36 15 $725 00 21 75 2 51 89 02 07 2014 16 36 0 09062857 $65 71 $725 00 0 14 2 51 94 02 07 2014 16 36 0 05 $36 25 $725 00 0 08 2 51 99 02 07 2014 16 36 0 05 $36 25 $725 00 0 08 2 62 68 02 07 2014 16 37 10 69418605 $725 00 15 51 2 65 34 02 07 2014 16 46 2 65631349 $734 00 3 9 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Anaiysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 65 35 02 07 2014 16 46 0 01398601 $10 27 $734 00 0 03 2 65 35 02 07 2014 16 46 0 00399864 $734 00 0 01 2 65 39 02 07 2014 16 46 0 036 6 42 $734 00 0 06 2 944 36 02 07 2014 16 46 878 96793 $734 00 1290 33 2 975 35 02 07 2014 16 46 3099607827 $734 00 45 51 2 987 31 02 07 2014 16 46 11 96007672 $734 00 17 56 2 987 76 02 07 2014 16 46 0 446 $327 36 $734 00 0 66 2 988 2 02 07 2014 16 46 0 444 $325 90 $734 00 0 66 2' 988 27 02 07 2014 16 47 0 06215258 $45 62 $734 00 0 1 1 588 27 02 07 2014 17 15 400 0 0 689 6 02 07 2014 21 25 101 3334 0 2 689 58 02 09 2014 20 59 43 02168 $15 11 $697 00 0 04 2 689 13 02 09 2014 20 59 0 4457 $310 65 $697 00 0 63 2 689 11 02 09 2014 20 59 -0 025 $17 42 $697 00 0 04 2 689 08 02 09 2014 20 59 0 02_5 $17 42 $697 00 0 04 2 689 03 02 09 2014 20 59 004841 $33 74 $697 00 0 07 2 689 01 02 09 2014 21 00 -0 025 $17 42 $697 00 0 04 - 2 688 96 02 09 2014 21 00 -0 0511 $35 61 $597 00 0 08 2 688 23 02 09 2014 21 11 -0 72755 $502 74 $691 00 1 01 2 686 23 02 09 2014 21 12 2 $1 382 00 $691 00 2 77 2 682 82 02 09 2014 21 12 -3 41169 $2 357 48 $691 00 4 72 2 674 04 02 09 2014 21 12 -8 7812 $6 067 81 $691 00 12 14 2 671 94 02 09 2014 21 12 -2 1 $1 451 10 $691 00 2 91 2 662 44 02 09 2014 21 12 -9 5 $6 564 50 $691 00 13 13 2 662 39 02 09 2014 21 12 -0 045 $31 10 $691 00 0 07 2 660 42 02 09 2014 21 12 -1 9685 $1 360 23 $691 00 2 73 2 656 12 02 09 2014 21 12 4 29916 $2 970 72 $691 00 5 95 2 631 12 02 09 2014 21 12 -25 $17 275 00 $691 00 34 55 2 623 99 02 09 2014 21 12 -7 13153 $4 927 89 $691 00 9 86 2 623 95 02 09 2014 21 12 -0 045 $31 10 $691 00 0 07 2 622 95 02 09 2014 21 12 1 $691 00 $691 00 1 39 2 615 78 02 09 2014 21 12 -7 17135 $4 955 40 $691 00 9 92 2 615 77 02 09 2014 21 13 0 01027 $7 10 $691 00 0 02 2 615 74 02 09 2014 21 14 0 02375 $16 41 $691 00 0 04 2 615 51 02 09 2014 21 14 0 23 $158 93 $691 00 0 32 2' 609 51 02 09 2014 21 14 -6 $4 146 00 $691 00 8 3 2 609 28 02 09 2014 21 14 0 23 $158 93 $691 00 0 32 2 608 83 02 09 2014 21 14 -0 45 $310 95 $691 00 0 63 2 605 09 02 09 2014 21 14 3 74185 $2 585 62 $691 00 5 18 2 604 86 02 09 2014 21 15 -0 23 $158 93 $691 00 0 32 2 604 41 02 09 2014 21 1 5 -0 448 $309 57 $691 00 0 62 2 604 38 02 09 2014 21 15 -0 03129 $21 62 $691 00 0 05 2 604 15 02 09 2014 21 15 -0 23 $158 93 $691 00 0 32 2 603 7 32 09 2014 21 15 -0 448 $309 57 $691 00 0 62 2 603 62 02 09 2014 21 15 008239 $56 93 $691 00 0 12 2 603 49 02 09 2014 21 15 0 12746 $88 07 $691 00 0 18 2 603 26 02 09 2014 21 15 -0 23 $158 93 $691 00 0 32 2 10 02 09 2014 21 15 -593 259 $409 942 20 $691 00 819 39 2 17 53 02 10 2014 9 05 7 52533352 $681 00 10 25 2 131 17 02 10 2014 9 14 113 6385696 $681 00 154 78 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 143 46 02 10 2014 10 10 12 2925933 $681 00 16 75 2 263 46 02 10 2014 10 10 120 $681 00 163 44 2 263 73 02 1 012014 10 10 0 2685 $182 85 $661 00 0 37 2 264 23 02 10 2014 10 10 0 5 $340 50 $681 00 0 69 2 270 51 02 10 2014 10 11 6 27756795 $681 00 8 56 2 272 51 02 10 2014 10 11 2 $681 00 2 73 2 275 3 02 10 2014 10 11 2 79308915 $681 00 3 81 2 275 6 02 10 2014 10 11 0 3 $204 30 $681 00 0 41 2 280 6 02 10 2014 10 11 5 $681 00 6 81 2 281 88 02 10 2014 10 11 1 285 $875 08 $681 00 1 76 2 311 88 02 10 2014 10 11 30 $681 00 40 86 2 350 14 02 10 2014 10 11 3825908897 $681 00 52 11 2 355 14 02 1 012014 10 11 5 $681 00 6 81 2 356 14 02 10 2014 10 11 1 $681 00 $681 00 1 37 2 358 49 02 10 2014 10 11 2 3501542 $681 00 3 21 2 358 74 02 10 2014 10 11 0 25 $170 25 $681 00 0 35 2 361 74 02 10 2014 10 11 3 $681 00 4 09 2 377 5 02 10 2014 10 12 1575918895 $681 00 21 47 - 2 421 55 02 10 2014 10 12 44 0439854 $681 00 59 99 2 423 4 02 10 2014 10 12 1 849 $681 00 2 52 2 436 49 02 10 201410 12 1309801194 $681 00 17 84 2 438 49 02 10 2014 10 12 2 $681 00 2 73 2 442 78 02 10 2014 10 12 4 28298988 $681 00 5 84 2 456 88 02 10 201410212 14 1 $681 00 19 21 2 478 04 02 10 2014 10 12 21 15872992 @440910 $681 00 28 82 2 489 3 02 10 2014 10 12 11 2661 $681 00 15 35 2 491 9 02 10 201410112 2 6 $681 00 3 55 2 494 9 02 10 2014 10 12 3 $681 00 4 09 2 504 79 02 10 2014 10 12 9 88322 $681 00 13 47 2 631 79 02 10 2014 10 12 127 $681 00 172 98 2 633 79 02 10 2014 10 12 2 $681 00 2 73 2 686 8 02 10 2014 10 12 53 01887715 $681 00 72 22 2 696 8 02 10 2014 10512 10 $681 00 13 62 2 613 92 02 10 2014 11 56 82 8816 $53 873 05 $650 00 107 75 2 612 28 02 10 201412 07 1 64714 $1 012 99 $615 00 2 03 2 612 24 02 10 2014 12 07 003625 $22 29 $615 00 0 05 2 612 14 02 10 2014 12 07 0 09479 $58 29 $615 00 0 12 2 612 04 02 10 201412 07 -0 1 $61 50 $615 00 0 13 2 611 39 02110 2014 12 07 -0 65357 $401 95 $615 00 0 81 2 610 39 02 10 201412 07 -1 $615 00 $615 00 1 23 2 602 34 02 10 2014 12 07 -8 05 $4 950 75 $615 00 9 91 2 602 32 02l1 012014 12 07 0 024 $14 76 $615 00 0 03 2 602 28 02 10 2014 12 07 003625 $22 29 $615 00 0 05 2 602 18 02 10 2014 12 07 -0 1 $61 50 $615 00 0 13 2 572 18 02 10 2014 12 07 -30 $18 450 00 $615 00 36 9 2 572 1 02 10 2014 12 07 -0 08 $49 20 $615 00 0 1 2 572 06 02 10 2014 12 07 003625 $22 29 $615 00 0 05 2 572 03 02 10 2014 12 08 0 03625 $22 29 $615 00 0 05 2 571 99 02 10 2014 12 08 -0 03625 $22 29 $615 00 0 05 2 571 85 02 10 2014 12 08 -0 14148 $87 01 $615 00 0 18 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 571 35 0211012014 12 08 -0 5 $307 50 $615 00 0 62 2 570 35 02 10 2014 12 08 -1 $615 00 $615 00 1 23 2 406 34 0211012014 12 08 164 007 $100 864 14 $615 00 201 73 2 10 0211012014 12 08 -396 339 $243 748 75 $615 00 487 5 0 410 0211012014 12 25 3999999 0 2 373 66 0211012014 14 36 36 3424 $23 622 57 $650 00 47 25 2 368 03 0211012014 14 36 -5 62698 $3 657 54 $650 00 7 32 2 360 9 02110 2014 14 36 -7 13 $4 634 50 $650 00 9 27 2 359 9 0211012014 14 36 1 $650 00 $650 00 1 3 2 356 9 0211012014 14 36 -3 $1 950 00 $650 00 3 9 2 288 35 0211012014 14 36 68 55 $44 557 50 $650 00 89 12 2 254 79 0211012014 14 36 -33 5654 $21 817 52 $650 00 43 64 2 188 99 0211012014 14 36 65 8011 $42 770 70 $650 00 65 55 2 182 43 0211012014 14 37 6 56 $4 264 00 $650 00 8 53 2 172 43 0211012014 14 37 10 $6 500 00 $650 00 13 2 62 99 02110 2014 14 37 -109 436 $71 133 32 $650 00 142 27 2 60 17 0211012014 14 37 -2 82323 $1 835 10 $650 00 3 68 2 55 16 0211012014 14 37 5 01 $3 256 50 $650 00 6 52 2 10 0211012014 14 37 -45 1549 $29 350 69 $650 00 58 71 2 143 28 0211312014 17 58 1332781713 $640 00 170 6 2 148 28 0211312014 17 58 5 $640 00 6 4 2 153 28 02113 2014 17 58 5 $640 00 6 4 2 182 28 0211312014 17 58 29 $640 00 37 12 2 187 28 02 1 312014 17 58 5 $640 00 6 4 2 208 08 0211312014 17 58 20 8 $640 00 26 63 2 212 58 0211312014 17 59 4 50066 $640 00 5 77 2 222 42 0211312014 17 59 9 83964 $640 00 12 6 2 226 42 0211312014 17 59 4 $640 00 5 12 2 227 42 0211312014 17 59 1 $640 00 $640 00 1 28 2 262 42 0211312014 17 59 35 $640 00 44 8 2 324 56 0211312014 17 59 6213412394 $640 00 79 54 2 326 77 0211312014 17 59 2 21752813 $640 00 2 84 2 331 79 0211312014 17 59 5 02 $640 00 6 43 2 332 29 0211312014 17 59 0 5 $320 00 $640 00 0 64 2 334 29 0211312014 17 59 2 $640 00 2 56 2 334 52 0211312014 17 59 0 23 $147 20 $640 00 0 3 2 334 75 0211312014 17 59 0 23 $147 20 $640 00 0 3 2 338 57 0211312014 17 59 3 82 $640 00 4 89 2 338 8 0211312014 17 59 0 23 $147 20 $640 00 0 3 2 345 81 0211312014 17 59 7 0022923 $640 00 8 97 2 348 89 0211312014 18 00 3 08554 $640 00 3 95 2 354 06 0211312014 18 00 5 16937721 $640 00 6 62 2 362 19 0211312014 18 00 8 1321787 $640 00 10 41 2 363 19 0211312014 18 00 1 $640 00 $640 00 1 28 2 389 73 0211312014 18 00 26 541051 $640 00 33 98 2 414 0211312014 18 00 24 26943742 $640 00 31 07 2 600 18 0211312014 21 21 186 1778195 $608 00 226 4 2 607 65 0211312014 21 21 7 46530618 $608 00 9 08 2 623 71 0211312014 21 22 16 06259934 $608 00 19 54 2 625 13 0211312014 21 22 1 42395 $865 76 $608 00 1 74 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to 1 130 from Safes Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit W hdraw BTC Purchase BTG Sold Purchase BTC of ETC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 625 37 02113 2014 21 22 0 24073846 $146 37 $608 00 0 3 2 669 37 0211312014 21 22 44 $608 00 53 51 2 678 56 0211312014 21 22 9 18479 $608 00 11 17 2 741 56 02 13 2014 21 22 63 $608 00 76 61 2 746 56 02113 2014 21 22 5 $608 00 608 2 750 91 02113 2014 21 22 4 35 $608 00 5 29 2 753 71 02 1312014 21 22 2 8 $608 00 3 41 2 792 51 0211312014 21 22 38 8 $608 00 47 19 2 805 05 0211312014 21 22 1254294711 $608 00 15 26 2 813 05 0211312014 21 22 8 $608 00 9 73 2 843 05 0211312014 21 22 30 $608 00 36 48 2 901 25 0211312014 21 22 5820014515 $608 00 70 78 2 962 09 0211312014 21 22 6083678914 $608 00 73 98 2 965 27 0211312014 21 22 3 17848767 $608 00 3 87 2 970 27 0211312014 21 22 5 $608 00 6 08 2 1026 34 0211312014 21 22 56 06985233 $608 00 68 19 2 1026 84 0211312014 21 22 0 50254181 $305 55 $608 00 0 62 2 1027 34 0211312014 21 23 0 5 $304 00 $608 00 0 61 2 1032 58 0211312014 21 23 5 23552532 $608 00 6 37 2 1037 22 0211312014 21 23 4 64490152 $608 00 5 65 2 1037 22 02 1312014 21 23 0 $608 00 0 01 2 1094 18 0211312014 21 23 5696323708 $608 00 69 27 2 1097 9 0211312014 21 23 3 72 $608 00 4 53 2 1098 4 0211312014 21 23 0 5 $304 00 $608 00 0 61 2 1099 3 0211312014 21 23 0 9 $547 20 $608 00 1 1 2 1099 41 0211312014 21 23 0 11038469 $67 11 $608 00 0 14 2 1109 52 0211312014 21 23 1010110475 $608 00 12 29 2 1110 71 0211312014 21 23 1 19888 $728 92 $608 00 1 46 2 1031 47 0211412014 3 36 79 2422 $47 545 35 $600 00 95 1 2 988 58 0211412014 3 37 42 8909 $25 734 52 $600 00 51 47 2 866 98 0211412014 3 38 -121 6 $72 960 00 $600 00 145 92 2 854 05 0211412014 3 38 42 9269 $7 756 13 $600 00 15 52 2 804 05 0211412014 3 38 50 $30 000 00 $600 00 60 2 803 95 0211412014 3 38 -0 1 $60 00 $600 00 0 12 2 610 0211412014 3 38 193 95 $116 370 00 $600 00 232 74 2 650 31 02 14 2014 18 06 40 30741878 $672 00 54 18 2 677 97 0211412014 18 07 27 66358109 $672 00 37 18 2 711 09 0211412014 18 07 33 11541565 $672 00 44 51 2 711 19 0211412014 18 07 0 1 $67 20 $672 00 0 14 2 711 29 02114 2014 18 07 0 1 $67 20 $672 00 0 14 2 728 07 0211412014 18 07 16 78 $672 00 22 56 2 728 17 0211412014 18 07 0 1 $67 20 $672 00 0 14 2 766 86 0211412014 18 09 3868469538 $672 00 52 2 766 96 0211412014 18 09 0 1 $67 20 $672 00 0 14 2 781 55 0211412014 18 10 14 59562433 $672 00 19 62 2 787 11 0211412014 18 10 5 56123809 $672 00 7 48 2 792 52 0211412014 18 10 5 41278875 $672 00 7 28 2 794 52 0211412014 18 10 2 $672 00 2 69 2 794 85 0211412014 18 10 0 32302027 $17 07 $672 00 0 44 2 796 67 0211412014 18 10 1 82689557 $672 00 2 46 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to 080 from Sales Type Balance Date-time ETC Deposit Withdraw BT13 Purchase BTC Sold Purchase 670 of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 798 67 0211412014 18 10 2 5672 00 2 59 2 810 53 0211412014 18 11 1185045677 $7063 51 5672 00 15 93 2 810 85 0211412014 18 11 0 3262858 152111 21 - 567200 0 44 2 821 79 0211412014 18 14 1093744873 137 3 117- - 557200 14 7 2 919 95 0211412014 18 16 9816497771 665656 671 8672 00 131 94 2 960 39 02114120141913 4043810579 827 174 4111 $672 00 54 35 974 7 0211412014 19 25 1430921344 159 615 1111 $672 00 19 24 - 2 976 08 0211412014 19 25 1 37868 121926 471 $672 00 1 85 2 976 15 0211412014 19 26 0 0728090 Eu-111 011 $672 00 0 1 2 976 23 0211412014 19 26 0 0769230 $51 00 $672 00 0 11 2 1055 5 0211412014 19 26 7927442184 853 272 - $672 00 106 55 2 1055 28 0211612014 19 19 -0 22331 $134 88 $604 00 0 27 2 1054 81 0211612014 19 19 067118 $405 39 $604 00 0 82 2 1053 64 02 16 2014 19219 0 96609 $583 52 $604 00 1 17 2 1052 64 0211612014 19 19 1 $604 00 $604 00 1 21 2 1052 61 0211612014 19 20 -0 031 $18 72 $604 00 0 04 2 1024 71 02 16 2014 19 20 27 8999 $16 851 53 $604 00 33 71 2 1010 94 0211612014 19 21 13 776 $8 320 68 $604 00 16 65 2 1010 88 0211612014 19 21 -0 05921 $35 77 $604 00 0 08 2 1010 83 0211612014 19 21 005236 $31 62 $604 00 0 07 2 1010 8 02116 201419 21 0 02578 $15 57 $604 00 0 04 2 1010 49 02116 2014 19 22 -0 31023 $187 38 $604 00 0 38 2 980 41 0211812014 19 22 -30 0809 $18 168 88 $604 00 36 34 2 980 31 0211612014 19 22 -0 097 $58 59 $604 00 0 12 2 979 31 0211612014 19 22 1 $604 00 $604 00 1 21 2 974 73 0211612014 19 22 458554 $2 769 66 $604 00 5 54 - 2 973 73 0211612014 19 22 -1 $604 00 $604 00 1 21 2 879 24 02116 2014 19 22 94 4868 $57 070 03 $604 00 114 15 2 876 47 0211612014 19 22 2 77355 $1 875 22 $604 00 3 36 2 876 38 0211612014 19 22 -0 085 $51 34 $604 00 0 11 2 874 38 0211612014 19 22 -2 $1 208 00 $604 09 2 42 2 874 34 02116 2014 19 22 -0 03767 $22 75 $604 00 0 05 2 874 31 0211612014 19 26 0 031 $18 38 $593 00 0 04 2 874 21 02116 201419 26 -0 1 $59 45 $594 45 0 12 2 874 08 02116120141926 0 13 $77 17 $593 59 0 16 2 873 95 02116120141926 0 13 $77 08 $592 92 0 16 2 873 11 0211612014 19 26 084317 $500 00 $593 00 1 2 846 52 0211612014 19 26 26 5837 $15 817 30 $595 00 31 64 2 846 5 0211612014 19 26 0 02 $11 84 $592 00 0 03 2 846 42 0211612014 19 26 0 08 $47 36 $592 00 0 1 2 846 29 0211612014 19 26 -0 13 $77 04 $592 59 0 16 2 845 31 0211612014 19 26 098882 $583 57 $590 17 1 17 2 842 81 02116120141926 2 5 $1 480 25 $592 10 2 97 2 839 81 02116120141926 3 $1 773 33 $591 11 3 55 2 835 81 0211612014 19 26 4 $2 364 40 $591 10 4 73 2 830 81 0211612014 19 26 -5 $2 955 60 $591 12 5 92 2 825 81 0211612014 19 26 -5 $2 955 00 $591 00 5 91 2 820 81 0211612014 19 26 5 $2 950 90 $590 18 5 91 2 813 48 0211612014 19 26 -7 3236 $4 335 57 $592 00 8 68 2 805 11 02116120141926 8 37683 $4 951 71 $591 12 9 91 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily ETC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetirne BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC 801 Purchase BTC of ETC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 800 11 12 16 2014 19 26 -5 $2 950 85 5590 17 5 91 2 799 98 02 16 201419z26 -0 12414 $73 27 $590 17 0 15 2 799 9 02 16 2014 19 26 0 08 $47 21 $590 17 0 1 2 799 89 02 16 2014 19 26 0 0102 $6 02 $590 17 0 02 2 799 79 02 16 201419z26 0 1 $59 02 $590 17 0 12 2 799 74 02 16 2014 19 26 0 05 $29 51 $590 17 0 06 2 798 74 02 16 201419 26 -1 $590 17 $590 17 1 19 2 798 67 02 16 2014 19 26 0 07 $41 31 $590 17 0 09 2 798 57 02 16 201419 26 -0 1 $59 02 $590 17 0 12 2 798 07 02 16 2014 19 26 0 5 $295 08 $590 17 0 6 2 793 67 02 16 2014 19 26 -4 4 $2 596 75 $590 17 5 2 2 793 64 02 16 201419 26 0 031 $18 30 $590 17 0 04 2 793 59 02 16 2014 19 26 -0 05 $29 51 $590 17 0 06 2 793 54 02 16 2014 19 26 -0 05 $29 51 $590 17 0 06 2 793 49 02 16 2014 19 26 -0 04704 $27 76 $590 17 0 06 2 788 49 02 16 2014 19 26 -5 $2 950 85 $590 17 5 91 2 786 39 02 16 2014 19 26 2 1 $1 239 36 $590 17 2 48 2 786 29 02 16 2014 19 26 0 1 $59 02 $590 17 0 12 2 786 24 02 16 2014 19 26 0 05 $29 51 $590 17 0 06 2 786 14 02 16 201419 26 -0 1 $59 02 $590 17 0 12 2 785 6 02 16 2014 19 26 053855 $317 84 $590 17 0 64 2 781 6 02 16 2014 19 26 4 $2 360 68 $590 17 4 73 2 776 8 02 16 2014 19 26 4 8 $2 832 82 $590 17 5 67 2 773 8 02 16 2014 19 26 -3 $1 770 51 $590 17 3 55 2 768 8 02 16 2014 19 26 5 $2 950 85 $590 17 591 2 768 39 02 16 2014 19 26 -0 41085 $242 47 $590 17 0 49 2 768 34 02 16 201419z27 0 05 $29 51 $590 17 0 06 2 767 34 02 16 201419 27 -1 $590 17 $590 17 1 19 2 757 34 02 16 20141927 10 $5 901 70 $590 17 11 81 2 697 74 02 16 2014 19 27 -59 6083 $35 179 02 $590 17 70 36 2 697 68 02 16 201419z27 0 05921 $34 95 $590 17 0 07 2 696 63 02 16 201419 27 -1 04209 $615 01 $590 17 1 24 2 696 53 02 16 2014 19 27 0 1 $59 02 $590 17 0 12 2 696 5 02 16 201419z27 0 031 $18 30 $590 17 0 04 2 696 13 02 16 201419z27 0 371 19 $219 07 $590 17 0 44 2 695 63 02 16 2014 19 27 0 5 $295 08 $590 17 0 6 2 690 38 02 16 2014 19 27 -5 24953 $3 098 12 $590 17 6 2 2 690 36 02 16 2014 19 27 0 02 $11 80 $590 17 0 03 2 689 96 02 16 2014 19 27 0 4 $236 07 $590 17 0 48 2 689 9 02 16 2014 19 27 -0 06 $35 41 $590 17 0 08 2 668 6 02l16 201419 27 21_3021 $12 571 84 $590 17 25 15 2 658 6 02 16 201419 27 H10 $5 901 70 $590 17 11 81 2 638 6 02 16 2014 19 27 ' 20 $11 803 40 $590 17 23 61 2 613 31 02 16 20141927 -25 2913 $14 926 16 $590 17 29 86 2 613 29 02 16 201419z27 -0 02 $11 80 $590 17 0 03 2 613 24 02 16 2014 19 27 -0 05 $29 51 $590 17 0 06 2 601 93 02 16 2014 19 27 -1 1 3083 $6 673 84 $590 17 13 35 2 541 93 02 16 2014 19 27 60 $35 410 20 $590 17 70 83 2 541 88 02 16 2014 19 27 0 05 $29 51 $590 17 0 06 2 540 34 02 16 2014 19 27 4 5381 $907 74 $590 17 1 82 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Anaiysis Daily I BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of ETC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 535 34 0271672014 19 27 5 $2 950 85 $590 17 5 91 2 515 93 0271972014 4 44 19 4094 $12 227 95 $630 00 24 46 2 235 34 0271972014 18 59 -280 591 $176 772 05 $630 00 353 55 2 535 34 0271972014 22 17 300 $619 00 371 4 2 535 35 0272072014 1 18 0 00634845 $628 50 0 01 2 763 66 0272072014 3 12 228 3149817 $623 00 284 49 2 839 35 0272072014 3 14 75 68501826 $623 00 94 31 2 860 14 0272072014 17 09 20 79112079 $579 00 24 08 2 863 24 02720 2014 17 25 3 1000115 $579 00 3 59 2 865 64 02720720141725 2 4 $579 00 2 78 2 865 69 0272072014 17 25 0048885391 $579 00 0 06 2 867 69 0272072014 17 25 2 $579 00 2 32 2 875 18 0272072014 17 26 7 49604007 $579 00 8 69 2 875 23 0272072014 17 26 0 04653051 $579 00 0 06 2 882 15 0272072014 17 26 6 92 $579 00 8 02 2 882 4 0272072014 17 26 0 25257536 $579 00 0 3 2 892 4 0272072014 17 26 10 $579 00 11 58 2 892 45 0272072014 17 26 0 04446756 $579 00 0 06 2 964 85 0272072014 17 26 7239875552 $579 00 83 84 2 986 86 0272072014 17 27 22 00819477 $579 00 25 49 2 1036 86 0272072014 17 27 50 $579 00 57 9 2 1036 9 0272072014 17 27 0 03987007 $579 00 0 05 2 1038 19 0272072014 17 27 129782344 $579 00 1 51 2 1041 25 0272072014 17 27 3 054 $579 00 3 54 2 1041 45 0272072014 17 27 0 2 $579 00 0 24 2 1041 48 0272072014 17 27 0 03810205 $579 00 0 05 2 1043 28 02720720141728 1 8 $579 00 2 09 2 1043 32 0272072014 17 28 0 03484683 $579 00 0 05 2 1043 35 0272072014 17 29 0 03330803 $579 00 0 04 2 1049 0272072014 17 29 5 64363 $579 00 6 54 2 1049 75 0272072014 17 29 0 75223359 $579 00 0 88 2 995 38 0272172014 0 45 -54 3719 $30 176 43 $555 00 60 36 2 995 18 0272172014 0 45 -0 19502 $108 23 $555 00 0 22 2 977 69 02 21 2014 0 45 47 4944 $9 709 36 $555 00 19 42 2 977 64 0272172014 0 46 -0 05 $27 75 $555 00 0 06 2 971 26 0272172014 0 46 6 37982 $3 540 80 $555 00 7 09 2 969 83 0272172014 0 46 -1 4273 $792 15 $555 00 1 59 2 966 02 0272172014 0 47 3 81017 $2 114 65 $555 00 4 23 2 951 72 0272172014 0 47 -14 3017 $7 937 43 $555 00 15 88 2 950 1 0272172014 0 47 1 61823 $898 12 $555 00 1 8 2 1052 1 0272172014 1 29 102 $540 00 110 16 2 1051 75 0272172014 2 03 0 35149 $195 08 $555 00 0 4 2 1020 67 02721720141504 31 079 $17 808 29 $573 00 35 62 2 1013 67 0272172014 15 04 -6 99517 $4 008 23 $573 00 8 02 2 997 17 02721720141504 16 5069 $9 458 45 $573 00 18 92 2 997 14 0272172014 15 04 0 02786 $15 96 $573 00 0 04 2 996 5 02721720141504 0 641 $367 29 $573 00 0 74 2 995 84 02 21 2014 15 04 0 656 $375 89 $573 00 0 76 2 988 39 0272172014 15 04 745168 $4 269 81 $573 00 8 54 2 967 89 02 21 201415 05 20 5 $11 746 50 $573 00 23 5 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily ETC USU Used to from Sales lype Baiance Datetime BTC D osit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 966 15 02 21 2014 15 05 -1 74033 $997 21 $573 00 2 2 965 56 02 21 2014 15 05 -0 59305 $339 82 $573 00 0 68 2 951 75 02 21 2014 15 06 -13 809 $7 912 54 $573 00 15 83 2 948 13 02 22 2014 16 26 3 61879 $2 124 23 $587 00 4 25 2 903 01 02 22 2014 16 28 -45 1219 $26 486 58 $587 00 52 98 2 881 98 0222 2014 16 28 -21 032 $12 345 79 $587 00 24 7 2 879 98 02 22 2014 16 28 2 $1 174 00 $587 00 2 35 2 877 87 02 22 2014 16 29 -2 10743 $1 237 06 $587 00 2 48 2 782 58 02 22 2014 16 29 -95 2876 $55 933 80 $587 00 111 87 2 782 57 02 22 2014 16 29 -0 01511 $8 87 $587 00 0 02 2 751 95 02 22 2014 16 29 30 6171 $17 972 22 $587 00 35 95 2 751 75 02 22 2014 16 29 -0 20009 $117 45 $587 00 0 24 2 729 19 02 23 2014 16 32 -22 5638 $14 215 17 $630 00 28 44 2 715 2 02 23 2014 16 32 13 9881 $8 812 52 $630 00 17 63 2 702 4 02 23 2014 16 33 -12 8 $8 064 00 $630 00 16 13 2 702 2 02 23 2014 16 33 0 2 $126 00 $630 00 0 26 2 654 7 02 23 2014 16 33 47 4945 $29 921 52 $630 00 59 85 2 651 75 02 23 2014 16 33 2 95362 $1 860 78 $630 00 3 73 2 717 11 02 24 2014 0 08 65 36077499 $610 00 79 75 2 721 79 02 24 2014 0 08 4 67937293 $610 00 5 71 2 725 09 02 24 2014 0 09 3 29701593 $610 00 4 03 2 735 88 02 24 2014 0 09 10 79434 $610 00 13 17 2 736 88 02 24 2014 0 09 1 $610 00 $610 00 1 22 2 737 88 02 24 2014 0 09 1 $610 00 $610 00 1 22 2 739 26 02 24 2014 0 09 1 37490164 $838 69 $610 00 1 68 2 743 49 02 24 2014 0 09 4 23082191 $610 00 5 17 2 744 49 02 24 2014 0 09 1 $610 00 1 22 2 745 49 02 24 2014 0 09 1 $610 00 $610 00 1 22 2 746 49 02 24 2014 0 09 1 $610 00 $610 00 1 22 2 747 49 02 24 2014 0 09 1 $610 00 $610 00 1 22 2 748 18 02 24 2014 0 10 0 69478 $423 82 $610 00 0 85 2 749 18 02 24 2014 0 10 1 $610 00 $610 00 1 22 2 750 75 02 24 2014 0 10 1 5879926 $956 48 $610 00 1 92 2 751 75 02 24 2014 0 10 1 $610 00 $610 00 1 22 2 852 21 02 24 2014 2 23 100 4606941 $577 00 115 94 2 863 51 02 24 2014 2 23 11 30016176 $577 00 13 05 2 870 99 02 24 2014 2 24 7 47710656 $577 00 8 63 - 2 875 62 02 24 2014 2 49 4 6356691 $577 00 5 35 2 893 72 02 24 2014 2 50 18 10208678 $577 00 20 89 2 951 75 02 24 2014 2 53 5802428172 $577 00 66 97 2 1051 75 02 24 2014 6 05 100 $563 00 112 6 2 1059 15 02 24 2014 13 36 7 4 $575 00 8 51 2 1039 67 02 25 2014 3 17 19 4739 $9 444 86 $485 00 18 89 2 1033 6 02 25 2014 3 17 -6 07897 $2 948 30 $485 00 5 9 2 1032 43 02 25 2014 3 18 1 16766 $566 32 $485 00 1 14 2 1027 43 02 25 2014 3 18 -5 $2 425 00 $485 00 4 85 2 1023 9 02 25 2014 3 19 -3 5234 $1 708 85 $485 00 3 42 2 1017 28 02 25 2014 3 20 -6 62734 $3 214 26 $485 00 6 43 2 959 15 02 25 2014 3 20 58 1287 $28 192 41 $485 00 56 39 2 946 15 02 25 2014 4 09 12 9945 $6 497 23 $500 00 13 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily ETC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime ETC Deposit Wiihdraw BTC Purchase ETC 801d Purchase 8TB of ETC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 936 33 02 25 2014 4 09 9 821 $4 910 50 $500 00 9 83 2 936 33 02 25 2014 4 09 -0 0063 $3 15 $500 00 0 01 2 927 57 02 25 2014 4 09 87546 $4 377 30 $500 00 8 76 2 922 57 02 25 2014 4 09 -5 $2 500 00 $500 00 5 2 901 67 02 25 2014 4 10 -20 9011 $10 450 56 $500 00 20 91 2 893 19 02 25 2014 4 10 -8 48191 $4 240 96 $500 00 8 49 2 892 94 02 25 2014 4 10 0 25 $125 00 $500 00 0 25 2 891 44 02 25 2014 4 10 -1 50306 $751 53 $500 00 1 51 2 890 44 02 25 2014 4 10 1 $500 00 $500 00 1 2 880 44 02 25 2014 4 10 1 0 $5 000 00 $500 00 10 2 876 02 02 25 2014 4 11 4 4128 $2 206 40 $500 00 4 42 2 875 95 02 25 2014 4 11 0 071 $35 50 $500 00 0 08 2 865 95 02 25 2014 4 11 -10 $5 000 00 $500 00 10 2 859 15 02 25 2014 4 11 46 80375 $3 401 87 $500 00 6 81 2 880 97 02 25 2014 4 33 21 82547817 $470 00 20 52 2 881 65 02 25 2014 4 40 0 6759183 $470 00 0 64 2 905 45 02 25 2014 4 53 2379474311 $470 00 22 37 2 924 98 02 25 2014 4 53 19 53418 $470 00 18 37 2 944 72 02 25 2014 4 53 19 74069 $470 00 18 56 2 961 65 02 25 2014 4 53 1692899042 $470 00 15 92 2 942 15 02 25 2014 15 08 49 5003 $10 140 16 $520 00 20 29 2 942 08 02 25 2014 15 08 -0 066 $34 32 $520 00 0 07 2 935 94 02 25 2014 15 08 6 13773 $3 191 62 $520 00 6 39 2 913 02 25 2014 15 12 -22 9473 $11 932 61 $520 00 23 87 2 911 7 02 25 2014 15 15 1 29378 $672 77 $520 00 1 35 2 911 49 02 25 2014 15 15 -0 2111 $109 77 $520 00 0 22 2 898 87 02 25 2014 15 15 -12 622 $6 563 44 $520 00 13 13 2 825 84 02 25 2014 15 16 -73 0316 $37 976 42 $520 00 75 96 2 825 68 02 25 201415 16 -0 1562 $81 22 $520 00 0 17 2 825 68 02 25 2014 15 16 0 00612 $3 18 $520 00 0 01 2 825 67 02 25 2014 15 17 0 00701 $3 65 $520 00 0 01 2 825 12 02 25 201415 17 054715 $284 52 $520 00 0 57 2 761 65 02 25 2014 15 44 63 4737 $33 006 32 $520 00 66 02 2 605 06 02 26 2014 16 04 -156 592 $90 510 04 $578 00 181 03 2 604 06 02 26 2014 16 05 1 $578 00 $578 00 1 16 2 599 21 02 26 2014 16 05 4 8458 $2 800 87 $578 00 5 61 2 598 21 02 26 2014 16 05 1 $578 00 $578 00 1 16 2 597 21 02 26 2014 16 05 -1 $578 00 $578 00 1 16 2 587 14 02 26 201416 05 10 0715 $5 821 33 $578 00 11 65 2 586 91 02 26 2014 16 05 -0 23226 $134 25 $578 00 0 27 2 586 46 02 26 2014 16 05 0 44292 $256 01 $578 00 0 52 2 585 46 02 26 2014 16 05 1 $578 00 $578 00 1 16 2 584 46 02 26 2014 16 05 1 $578 00 $578 00 1 16 2 584 16 02 26 2014 16 05 -0 3022 $174 67 $578 00 0 35 2 575 16 02 26 2014 16 05 9 00282 $5 203 63 $578 00 10 41 2 574 16 02 26 2014 16 05 -1 $578 00 $578 00 1 16 2 574 03 02 26 2014 16 05 -0 125 $72 25 $578 00 0 15 2 573 53 02 26 2014 16 05 -0 5 $289 00 $578 00 0 58 2 564 68 02 26 2014 16 05 8 85303 $5 117 05 $578 00 10 24 2 563 68 02 26 2014 16 05 1 $578 00 $578 00 1 16 Appendix 7 CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Dain BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase ETC of STD Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 563 6 02 26 2014 16 05 -0 0833 $48 15 $578 00 0 1 2 561 65 02 26 2014 16 05 -1 94939 $1 126 75 $578 00 2 26 2 561 75 02 28 2014 14 37 0 1 550 1 0 $562 00 0 12 2 761 65 02 28 2014 20 30 199 9 $562 00 224 69 2 561 65 03 03 2014 8 20 200 $118 000 00 $590 00 236 2 508 52 03 03 201418 37 -53 1318 $36 395 30 $685 00 72 8 2 503 79 03 03 2014 18 38 4 72777 $3 238 52 $685 00 6 48 2 497 34 03 03 2014 18 38 644594 $4 415 47 $685 00 8 84 2 495 16 03 03 2014 18 38 2 18518 $1 496 85 $685 00 3 2 477 09 03 03 2014 18 38 48 0692 $12 377 40 $685 00 24 76 2 467 09 03 03 2014 18 38 -10 $6 850 00 $685 00 13 7 2 461 65 03 03 2014 18 38 -5 44008 $3 726 45 $685 00 7 46 2 462 14 03 03 2014 20 00 0 48940985 $654 66 0 65 2 462 2 03 03 2014 20 00 0 061 $655 00 0 08 2 470 72 03 03 2014 20 00 8 51964185 $655 00 11 17 2 495 63 03 03 2014 20 01 24 9067032 $655 00 32 63 2 496 63 03 03 2014 20 01 1 $655 00 1 31 2 497 63 03 03 2014 20 01 1 $655 00 1 31 2 497 68 03 03 2014 20 01 0 05 $655 00 0 07 2 497 74 03 03 2014 20 01 0 061 $655 00 0 08 2 507 91 03 03 2014 20 01 10 17 $655 00 13 33 2 507 96 03 03 2014 20 01 0 0516892 $655 00 0 07 2 557 46 03 03 2014 20 01 49 49733426 $655 00 64 85 2 557 94 03 03 2014 20 01 0 48 $655 00 0 63 2 558 03 03 2014 20 01 0 061 $655 00 0 08 2 560 01 03 03 2014 20 01 2 01096604 $655 00 2 64 2 560 51 03 03 2014 20 01 0 4995 $655 00 0 66 2 560 56 03 03 2014 20 01 0 05 $655 00 0 07 2 566 65 03 03 2014 20 05 6 0917556 1 $655 00 7 99 2 566 61 03 03 2014 22 00 003606 $24 19 $671 00 0 05 2 563 86 03 03 2014 22 00 2 7537 $1 847 73 $671 00 3 7 2 563 78 03 03 2014 22 00 -0 08 $53 68 $671 00 0 11 2 554 68 03 03 2014 22 02 910328 $6 108 30 $671 00 12 22 2 580 45 03 03 2014 22 06 25 77536532 1517 $663 00 34 18 2 583 48 03 03 2014 22 06 3 02539 $663 00 4 02 2 673 11 03 03 2014 22 21 89 63792861 1335 420 ii 31 $663 00 118 86 2 719 55 03 03 2014 22 42 46 43247982 -i $663 00 61 57 2 719 62 03 03 2014 22 42 0 07788161 1 41 $663 00 0 11 2 684 11 03 03 2014 22 59 -35 5133 $23 829 45 $671 00 47 66 2 631 25 03 03 2014 23 19 -52 8597 $35 468 88 $671 00 70 94 2 626 24 03 03 2014 23 20 -5 00962 $3 361 46 $671 00 6 73 2 624 35 03 03 2014 23 20 1 89017 $1 268 30 $671 00 2 54 2 623 07 03 03 2014 23 20 1 28577 $862 75 $671 00 1 73 2 613 04 03 03 2014 23 20 40 0306 $6 730 55 $671 00 13 47 2 611 02 03 03 2014 23 20 2 01293 $1 350 68 $671 00 2 71 2 611 01 03 03 2014 23 20 -0 01022 $6 86 $671 00 0 02 2 606 01 03 03 2014 23 20 -5 $3 355 00 $671 00 6 71 2 604 86 03 03 2014 23 21 -1 1478 $770 17 $671 00 1 55 2 602 86 03 03 2014 23 21 -2 $1 342 00 $671 00 2 69 2 600 86 03 03 2014 23 21 2 $1 342 00 $671 00 2 69 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Anaiysis I USD Used to Daily BTC 030 from Sales Tine Bafance Date me BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 600 69 03 03 2014 23 21 0 17178 $115 26 $671 00 0 24 2 598 41 03 03 2014 23 21 -2 27933 $1 529 43 $671 00 3 06 2 598 39 03 03 2014 23 21 -0 02657 $17 83 $671 00 0 04 2 598 09 03 03 2014 23 21 -0 3 $201 30 - $671 00 0 41 2 596 02 03 03 2014 23 22 2 06744 $1 387 25 $671 00 2 78 2 595 29 03 03 2014 23 22 0 72921 $489 30 $671 00 0 98 2 574 51 03 03 2014 23 22 20 7773 $13 941 56 $671 00 27 89 2 559 29 03 03 2014 23 23 -15 2196 $10 212 32 $671 00 20 43 2 558 36 03 03 2014 23 23 0 93 $624 03 $671 00 1 25 2 331 6 03 03 2014 23 24 -226 766 $152 159 72 $671 00 304 32 2 365 03l04 2014 6 54 33 40457579 $663 00 44 3 2 375 85 03 04 2014 6 55 10 84593327 $663 00 14 39 2 386 3 03 04 2014 6 55 10 455 $663 00 13 87 2 413 75 03 04 2014 6 55 27 44763 $663 00 36 4 2 423 2 03 04 2014 6 59 9 44973704 $663 00 12 54 2 429 98 03 04 2014 6 59 6 783085 $354 497 19 $663 00 9 2 566 65 03 04 2014 19 43 136 6649935 $663 00 181 22 2 568 58 03 04 2014 21 00 1 92662528 $668 00 2 58 2 569 65 03 04 2014 21 03 1 07337472 $717 01 7 $668 00 1 44 2 566 53 03 06 2014 3 08 3 11911 $2 105 40 $675 00 4 22 2 564 32 03 06 2014 3 09 2 21425 $1 494 62 $675 00 2 99 2 562 1 03 06 2014 3 11 -2 21336 $1 494 02 $675 00 2 99 2 531 51 03 06 2014 3 22 30 5885 $20 647 22 $675 00 41 3 2 472 7 03 06 2014 3 38 -58 8174 $39 701 77 $675 00 79 41 2 469 03 06 2014 3 39 -3 69224 $2 492 26 $675 00 4 99 2 469 36 03 06 2014 14 08 0 35883304 $235 04 $655 00 0 48 2 469 72 03 06 2014 14 08 0 35987 $235 71 $655 00 0 48 2 481 02 03 06 2014 14 08 11 30056 $655 00 14 81 2 490 06 03 06 2014 14 08 9 034538 $655 00 11 84 2 493 12 03 06 2014 14 08 3 0645445 $655 00 4 02 2 572 03 06 2014 14 21 78 88165446 - $655 00 103 34 2 737 03 07 2014 8 43 165 $650 00 214 5 2 673 35 03 07 2014 18 45 63 6571 $39 467 39 $620 00 78 94 2 672 64 03 07 2014 18 47 0 70736 $438 56 $620 00 0 88 2 671 99 03 07 2014 18 47 -0 65101 $403 62 $620 00 0 81 2 671 09 03 07 2014 18 48 -0 89587 $555 44 $620 00 1 12 2 670 47 03 07 2014 18 48 -0 61787 $383 08 $620 00 0 77 2 668 71 03 07 2014 18 48 1 76484 $1 094 20 $620 00 2 19 2 664 28 03 07 2014 18 48 -4 43284 - $2 748 36 $620 00 5 5 2 663 41 03 07 2014 18 48 -0 86998 $539 39 $620 00 7 1 08 2 655 36 03 07 2014 18 52 -8 04551 $4 988 22 $620 00 9 98 2 653 37 03 07 2014 18 52 -1 99 $1 233 80 $620 00 2 47 2 653 36 03 07 2014 18 52 0 01 $6 20 $620 00 0 02 2 653 28 03 07 2014 18 52 -0 08 $49 60 $620 00 0 1 2 653 25 03 07 2014 18 52 -0 03 $18 60 $620 00 0 04 2 639 09 03 07 2014 18 54 44 1666 $8 783 29 $620 00 17 57 2 637 03 07 2014 18 57 2 08104 $1 290 24 $620 00 2 59 2 525 56 03 07 2014 20 06 111 441 $70 764 83 $635 00 141 53 2 521 68 03 07 2014 20 06 3 87869 $2 462 97 $635 00 4 93 2 516 65 -5 03 $3 194 05 $635 00 6 39 03 07 2014 20 06 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Safes Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 506 05 03 07 2014 20 06 -10 6 $6 731 00 $635 00 13 47 2 505 51 03 07 2014 20 06 0 54866 $348 40 $635 00 0 7 2 503 54 03 07 2014 20 08 -1 96868 $1 250 11 $635 00 2 51 2 503 1 03 07 2014 20 08 -0 43843 $278 40 $635 00 0 56 2 487 2 03 07 2014 20 08 -15 9 $10 096 50 $635 00 20 2 2 476 96 03 07 2014 20 08 10 237 $6 500 50 $635 00 13 01 2 472 99 03 07 2014 20 08 3 96894 $2 520 28 $635 00 5 05 2 471 05 03 07 2014 20 09 1 94123 $1 232 68 $635 00 2 47 2 466 97 03 07 2014 20 09 4 08387 $2 593 26 $635 00 5 19 2 445 13 03 07 2014 20 09 21 84 $13 868 37 $635 00 27 74 2 440 02 03 07 2014 20 09 5 10417 $3 241 15 $635 00 6 49 2 437 03 07 2014 20 09 -3 0197 $1 917 51 $635 00 3 84 2 505 19 03 08 2014 16 02 68 18324273 $609 00 83 05 2 506 07 03 08 2014 16 03 0 88347809 $538 04 $609 00 1 08 2 540 03 08 2014 16 04 33 93327918 $609 00 41 34 2 410 03 11 2014' 21 18 -130 $83 200 00 $640 00 166 4 2 508 48 03 14 2014 19 38 98 47858485 $627 00 123 5 2 543 03 14 2014 19 43 34 52141515 $627 00 43 29 2 446 74 03 17 2014 18 45 -96 2642 $60 453 90 $628 00 120 91 2 443 03 17 2014 18 46 3 73583 $2 346 10 $628 00 4 7 2 509 52 03 18 2014 4 46 66 51350228 $617 00 82 08 2 544 03 18 2014 4 46 34 48649772 $617 00 42 56 2 576 03 20 2014 2 29 31 99638736 $600 00 38 4 2 649 03 20 2014 2 31 73 00361264 $600 00 87 61 2 590 54 03 21 2014 6 30 -58 4649 $34 085 01 $583 00 68 18 2 585 13 03 21 2014 6 30 -5 4076 $3 152 63 $583 00 6 31 2 567 75 03 21 2014 6 31 -17 383 $10 134 29 $583 00 20 27 2 567 25 03 21 2014 6 31 0 501 $292 08 $583 00 0 59 2 566 68 03 21 2014 6 31 0 57 $332 31 $583 00 0 67 2 566 18 03 21 2014 6 31 0 501 $292 08 $583 00 0 59 2 563 18 03 21 2014 6 32 3 $1 749 00 $583 00 3 5 2 559 29 03 21 2014 6 32 3 89 $2 267 87 $583 00 4 54 2 558 79 03 21 2014 6 32 -0 501 $292 08 $583 00 0 59 2 558 28 -0 501 $292 08 $583 00 0 59 2 557 78 03 21 2014 6 33 -0 5 $291 50 $583 00 0 59 2 557 28 03 21 2014 6 33 0 501 $292 08 $583 00 0 59 2 556 92 03 21 2014 6 34 0 36 $209 88 $583 00 0 42 2 553 84 03 21 2014 6 38 -3 08318 $1 797 49 $583 00 3 6 2 513 97 03 21 2014 6 39 39 8731 $23 246 03 $583 00 46 5 2 513 47 03 21 2014 6 39 -0 501 $292 08 $583 00 0 59 2 507 52 03 21 2014 6 40 -5 94646 $3 466 79 $583 00 6 94 2 507 02 03 21 2014 6 40 0 501 $292 08 $583 00 0 59 2 502 28 03 21 2014 6 40 -4 74182 $2 764 48 $583 00 5 53 2 501 78 03 21 2014 6 41 -0 501 $292 08 $583 00 0 59 2 500 78 03 21 2014 6 41 -1 $583 00 $583 00 1 17 2 349 03 21 2014 6 41 -151 772 $88 483 04 $583 00 176 97 2 345 8 03 21 2014 6 42 -3 20384 $1 890 27 $590 00 3 79 2 340 9 03121 2014 6243 4 90426 $2 893 52 $590 00 5 79 2 339 71 03 21 2014 6 43 -1 18951 $701 81 $590 00 1 41 2 339 11 03 21 2014 6 43 -0 6 $354 00 $590 00 0 71 CARL FORC Appendix BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USU Used to from 53835 Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase ETC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 149 03 21 2014 6 44 190 102 $112 160 41 $590 00 224 33 2 386 55 03 21 2014 11 00 237 5456064 $572 00 271 76 2 439 95 03 21 2014 11 00 5339585233 $572 00 61 09 2 441 36 03 21 2014 11 00 1 41811985 $811 16 $572 00 1 63 2 444 92 03 21 2014 11 00 3 55337884 $572 00 4 07 2 449 03 21 2014 11 00 4 08704255 $572 00 4 68 2 451 01 0321 2014 11 57 2 0057530 $565 00 2 27 2 500 35 03 21 2014 11 57 49 34196407 $565 00 55 76 2 467 51 03 21 2014 12 17 32 8425 $19 048 65 $580 00 38 1 2 464 15 03 21 201412 17 3 35884 $1 948 13 $580 00 3 9 2 422 34 03 21 2014 12 17 41 8095 $24 249 52 $580 00 48 5 2 419 15 03 21 2014 12 18 3 19011 $1 850 27 $580 00 3 71 2 403 53 03 21 2014 12 18 -15 617 $9 057 86 $580 00 18 12 2 402 53 03 21 2014 12 18 -1 0075 $584 35 $580 00 1 17 2 300 35 03 21 2014 12 20 -102 175 $59 261 22 $580 00 118 53 2 504 35 03 21 2014 20 28 204 - $570 00 232 56 2 804 35 03 22 2014 9 35 300 $560 00 336 2 790 04 03 22 2014 17 05 443136 $8 058 55 $563 00 16 12 2 704 35 03 22 2014 20 49 65 6864 $48 241 45 $563 00 96 49 2 - 573 53 03 22 2014 22 07 -130 817 $74 565 55 $570 00 149 14 2 566 92 03 22 2014 22 08 -6 61633 $3 771 31 $570 00 7 55 2 404 35 03 24 2014 17 54 -162 567 $92 663 14 $570 00 185 33 2 428 11 03124l2014 21 47 2376314511 $580 00 27 57 2 428 34 03 24 2014 21 48 0 23 $133 40 $580 00 0 27 2 428 5 03 24 2014 21 48 015238594 $88 38 $580 00 0 18 2 428 62 03 24 2014 21 48 0 12599994 $73 08 $580 00 0 15 2 428 87 03 24 2014 21 48 0 25 $145 00 $580 00 0 29 2 429 12 03 24 2014 21 48 0 25 $145 00 $580 00 0 29 2 429 37 03 24 2014 21 48 0 25 $145 00 $580 00 0 29 2 429 39 03 24 2014 21 48 001373667 $580 00 0 02 2 429 64 03 24 2014 21 48 0 25 $145 00 $580 00 0 29 2 433 9 03 24 2014 21 48 4 2605 $580 00 4 95 2 434 15 03 24 2014 21 48 0 25 $145 00 $580 00 0 29 2 434 4 03 24 2014 21 49 0 25 $145 00 $580 00 029 2 434 65 03 24 2014 21 49 0 25 $145 00 $580 00 0 29 2 441 9 03124 2014 21 49 7 25337424 $580 00 8 42 2 442 15 03 24 2014 21 49 0 25 $145 00 $580 00 0 29 2 442 4 03 24 2014 21 49 0 25 $145 00 $580 00 0 29 2 442 79 03 24 2014 21 49 0 3851923 $223 41 $580 00 0 45 2 442 8 03 24 2014 21 49 0 01781793 $10 33 $580 00 0 03 2 442 82 0312472014 21 49 0 012 $580 00 0 02 2 496 69 03 24 2014 21 50 53 87564199 $580 00 62 5 2 504 35 03 24 2014 21 50 766020588 $580 00 8 89 2 487 16 22 37 17 1908 $10 142 59 $590 00 20 29 2 425 13 03 24 2014 22 38 -62 0316 $36 598 66 $590 00 73 2 2 404 35 03 24 2014 22 39 -20 7776 $12 258 76 $590 00 24 52 2 407 77 03 25 2014 15 37 3 41905509 $575 00 3 94 2 502 37 03 25 2014 15 38 94 59548607 $575 00 108 79 2 504 82 03 25 2014 15 38 2457132832 $575 00 2 83 2 506 35 03 25 2014 15 38 1 52763052 $878 39 $575 00 1 76 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Baiance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 504 95 03 26 2014 17 24 -1 4 $821 80 $587 00 1 65 2 504 78 03 26 2014 17 37 -0 16961 $99 56 $587 00 0 2 2 504 58 03 26 2014 17 45 -0 2 $117 40 $587 00 0 24 2 504 46 03 26 2014 17 46 0 11871 $69 68 $587 00 0 14 2 504 18 03 26 2014 17 47 -0 2862 $168 00 $587 00 0 34 2 502 37 03 26 2014 17 48 -1 805 $1 059 54 $587 00 2 12 2 502 29 03 26 2014 17 53 008239 $48 36 $587 00 0 1 2 489 82 03 26 2014 17 59 42 4662 $7 317 67 $587 00 14 6 2 489 36 03 26 2014 17 59 -0 4653 $273 13 $587 00 0 55 2 489 16 03 26 2014 17 59 -0 2 $117 40 $587 00 0 24 2 487 54 03 26 2014 17 59 -1 619 $950 35 $587 00 1 91 2 486 86 03 26 2014 18 00 0 67551 $396 52 $587 00 0 8 2 486 53 03 26 2014 19 04 -0 33713 $197 89 $587 00 0 4 2 486 47 03 27 2014 14 49 0 06 $30 90 $515 00 0 07 2 486 4 03 27 2014 14 49 0 07 $36 05 $515 00 0 08 2 486 33 03 27 2014 14 49 1 -0 07 $36 05 $515 00 0 08 2 486 25 03 27 2014 14 49 -0 08 $41 20 $515 00 0 09 2 486 17 03 27 2014 14 49 0 08 $41 20 $515 00 0 09 2 486 09 03 27 2014 14 49 -0 08 $41 20 $515 00 0 09 2 486 01 03 27 2014 14 49 0 08 $41 20 $515 00 0 09 2 485 92 03 27 2014 14 49 -0 09 $46 35 $515 00 0 1 2 485 83 03 27 2014 14 49 -0 09 $46 35 $515 00 0 1 2 485 73 03 27 20'14 14 49 -0 1 $51 50 $515 00 0 11 2 485 63 03 27 2014 14 49 -0 1 $51 50 $515 00 0 11 2 485 42 03 27 2014 14 49 020878 $107 52 $515 00 0 22 2 484 72 03 27 2014 14 49 -0 7 $360 50 $515 00 0 73 2 484 65 03 27 2014 14 49 0 07 $36 05 $515 00 0 08 2 484 58 03 27 2014 14 49 -0 07 $36 05 $515 00 0 08 2 484 49 03 27 2014 14 49 -0 09 $46 35 $515 00 0 1 2 484 39 03 27 2014 14 49 0 1 $51 50 $515 00 0 11 2 484 29 03 27 2014 14 49 -0 1 $51 50 $515 00 0 11 2 483 29 03 27 2014 14 50 -1 0002 $515 10 $515 00 1 04 2 483 22 03 27 2014 14 50 -0 06841 $35 23 $515 00 0 08 2 482 24 03 27 201414250 -0 9743 $501 76 $515 00 1 01 2 474 57 03 27 2014 14 52 -7 67574 $3 953 01 $515 00 7 91 2 463 8 03 27 2014 14 52 40 7691 $5 546 09 $515 00 11 1 2 460 33 03 27 2014 14 52 847101 $1 787 57 $515 00 3 58 2 451 32 03 27 2014 14 53 -9 00764 $4 538 93 $515 00 9 28 2 450 4 03 27 2014 14 53 092208 $474 87 $515 00 0 95 2 450 3 03 27 2014 14 53 -D 1 $51 50 $515 00 0 11 2 443 05 03 27 2014 14 53 -7 24786 $3 732 65 $515 00 7 47 2 442 95 03 27 2014 14 53 0 1 $51 50 $515 00 0 11 2 386 53 13 27 2014 14 54 56 4249 $29 058 81 $515 00 58 12 2 377 74 03 27 2014 15 09 -B 79 $4 623 54 $526 00 9 25 2 286 53 13 27 2014 15 12 -91 21 $47 976 46 $526 00 95 96 2 388 53 03 27 2014 15 37 102 $516 00 105 27 2 490 53 03 27 2014 23 02 102 $505 00 103 02 2 490 45 03 27 2014 23 59 008086 $38 41 $475 00 0 08 2 490 08 03 27 2014 23 59 036909 $175 32 $475 00 0 36 2 486 93 03 27 2014 23 59 -3 14594 $1 494 32 $475 00 2 99 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC PurchaseBTC Soid Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 486 9 03 27 2014 23 59 0 02854 $13 56 $475 00 0 03 2 479 7 03 27 2014 23 59 -7 20714 $3 423 39 $475 00 6 85 2 479 56 03 27 2014 23 59 -0 13191 $62 66 $475 00 0 13 2 479 44 03 27 2014 23 59 -0 12598 $59 84 $475 00 0 12 2 479 28 03 27 2014 23 59 016022 $76 10 $475 00 0 16 2 479 23 03 28 2014 0 00 -0 05 $23 75 $475 00 0 05 2 469 4- 03128 2014 0 00 982526 $4 667 00 $475 00 9 34 2 469 22 03 28 2014 0 00 -0 1828 $86 83 $475 00 0 18 2 468 97 03 28 2014 0 00 0 2525 $119 94 $475 00 0 24 2 468 67 03 28 2014 0 00 0 3 $142 50 $475 00 0 29 2 467 73 03 28 2014 0 00 0 93912 $446 08 $475 00 0 9 2 465 73 03 28 2014 0 00 -2 $950 00 $475 00 1 9 2 457 23 03 28 2014 0 00 -8 49552 $4 035 37 $475 00 8 08 2 456 5 03 28 2014 0 00 0 73457 $348 92 $475 00 0 7 2 455 5 03 28 2014 0 00 -1 $475 00 $475 00 0 9 2 454 5 03 28 2014 0 00 -1 $475 00 $475 00 0 95 2 450 06 03 28 2014 0 00 -4 44055 $2 109 26 $475 00 4 22 2 449 06 03 28 2014 0 00 -1 0002 $475 10 $475 00 0 96 2 393 06 03 28 2014 0 00 56 $26 600 00 $475 00 53 2 2 390 53 03 28 2014 0 00 -2 52979 $1 201 65 $475 00 2 41 2 402 33 03 30 2014 12 46 11 80045309 $464 00 10 96 2 412 33 03 30 2014 12 46 10 $464 00 9 28 2 412 77 03 30 2014 12 46 0 4477 $207 73 $464 00 0 42 2 415 27 03 30 2014 12 46 2 5 $464 00 2 32 2 456 18 03 30 2014 12 47 40 90581 $464 00 37 97 2 461 17 03 30 2014 12 47 4 9851 $464 00 4 63 2 492 53 03 30 2014 12 48 31 36093691 $464 00 29 11 2 545 26 03 30 2014 16 23 52 73261336 $440 00 46 41 2 549 6 03 30 2014 16 24 4 33658305 $440 00 3 82 2 574 6 03 30 2014 16 25 25 $440 00 22 2 598 28 03 30 2014 16 25 2368187695 $440 00 20 85 2 598 82 03 30 2014 16 25 0 54 $237 60 $440 00 0 48 2 602 53 03 30 2014 16 25 3 70892664 $440 00 3 27 2 601 66 03 30 2014 17 08 -0 87011 $393 29 $452 00 0 79 2 598 17 03 30 2014 17 08 3 49 $1 577 48 $452 00 3 16 2 591 56 03 30 2014 17 08 -6 60677 $2 986 26 $452 00 5 98 2 583 73 03 30 2014 17 20 -7 82765 $3 538 10 $452 00 7 08 2 518 72 03 30 2014 17 22 65 01 $29 384 52 $452 00 58 77 2 510 34 03 30 2014 17 23 8 38071 $3 788 08 $452 00 7 58 2 504 99 0 3 30 2014 17 23 5 34869 $2 417 61 $452 00 4 84 2 504 97 03 30 2014 17 23 -0 02522 $11 40 $452 00 0 03 2 492 53 03 30 2014 17 24 12 4408 $5 623 26 $452 00 11 25 2 392 53 04 01 2014 6 40 -100 $47 000 00 $470 00 94 2 400 15 04 02 2014 14 55 7 62728845 $455 00 6 95 2 491 32 04 02 2014 14 55 91 16453641 $455 00 82 96 2 494 92 04 02 2014 14 55 3 6 $455 00 3 28 2 496 92 04l02 2014 14 55 2 $910 00 $455 00 1 82 2 497 53 04 02 2014 14 55 0 60817514 $276 72 $455 00 0 56 2 484 02 04 05 2014 23 18 13 5062 $6 206 11 $459 50 12 42 2 483 72 04 05 2014 23 19 -0 3 $137 85 $459 50 0 28 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase BTC Sold Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 483 12 04 05 2014 23 19 -0 6 $275 70 $459 50 0 56 2 480 62 04 05 2014 23 19 -2 5 $1 148 75 $459 50 2 3 2 480 35 04 05 2014 23 19 0 27 $124 06 $459 50 0 25 2 476 94 04 05 2014 23 25 341326 $1 568 39 $459 50 3 14 2 422 94 -54 $24 813 00 $459 50 49 63 2 418 44 04 05 2014 23 25 449349 $2 064 76 $459 50 4 13 2 418 34 04 05 2014 23 26 -0 1 $45 95 $459 50 0 1 2 418 09 04 05 2014 23 26 0 25 $114 88 $459 50 0 23 2 417 84 04 05 2014 23 26 -0 25 $114 88 $459 50 0 23 2 417 59 04 05 2014 23 28 -0 25 $114 88 $459 50 0 23 2 417 39 04 05 2014 23 28 -0 2 $91 90 $459 50 0 19 2 369 31 04 05 2014 23 28 418 0836 $22 094 39 $459 50 44 19 2 369 06 04 05 2014 23 26 0 25 $114 88 $459 50 0 23 2 363 96 04 05 2014 23 26 -5 1 $2 343 45 $459 50 4 69 2 363 71 04 05 2014 23 27 0 25 $114 88 $459 50 0 23 2 363 61 04 05 2014 23 27 -0 1 $45 95 $459 50 0 1 2 363 26 04 05 2014 23 27 -0 35 $180 82 $459 50 0 33 2 363 01 04 05 2014 23 27 -0 25 $114 88 $459 50 0 23 2 362 69 04 05 2014 23 27 -0 32 $147 04 $459 50 0 3 2 342 69 04 05 2014 23 28 20 $9 190 00 $459 50 18 38 2 342 64 04 05 2014 23 28 -0 04903 $22 53 $459 50 0 05 2 342 59 04 05 2014 23 28 0 05 $22 98 $459 50 0 05 2 310 04 05 2014 23 29 -32 5871 $14 973 78 $459 50 29 95 2 333 32 04 07 2014 15 33 23 32011113 $446 00 20 81 2 339 29 04 07 2014 18 41 5 9634107 $446 00 5 32 2 339 55 04 07 2014 16 42 0 26417274 $117 82 $448 00 0 24 2 341 12 04 07 2014 16 42 1 569 $699 77 $446 00 1 4 2 341 17 04 07 2014 16 43 0 05 $22 30 $446 00 0 05 2 341 22 04 07 2014 16 43 0 05 $22 30 $446 00 0 05 2 343 43 04 07 2014 16 43 2 21215 $986 62 $446 00 1 98 2 353 67 04 07 2014 16 43 10 24029149 $446 00 9 14 2 358 45 04 07 2014 16 44 2 775 $446 00 2 48 2 358 49 04 07 2014 16 44 0 04 $17 84 $446 00 0 04 2 358 53 04 07 2014 16 44 0 04 $17 84 $446 00 0 04 2 356 58 04 07 2014 16 44 0 05 $22 30 $446 00 0 05 2 356 63 04 07 2014 18 44 0 05 $22 30 $446 00 0 05 2 358 68 04 07 2014 16 44 0 05 $22 30 $446 00 0 05 2 356 68 04 07 2014 18 49 0 005 $446 00 0 01 2 357 79 04 07 2014 16 51 1 10815 $493 34 $446 00 0 99 2 358 63 04 07 2014 16 53 0 841 $375 09 $446 00 0 76 2 483 56 04 07 2014 18 56 1249277773 $448 00 111 44 2 488 69 04 07 2014 16 58 5 13083658 $446 00 4 58 2 495 36 04 07 2014 16 56 6 67204343 $446 00 5 96 2 510 04 09 2014 12 14 1464305666 $446 00 13 07 2 539 7 04 10 2014 3 22 29 69973285 $429 00 25 49 2 554 74 04 10 2014 3 22 15 03332 $429 00 12 9 2 569 71 04 10 2014 3 22 14 975 $429 00 12 65 2 569 8 04 10 2014 3 22 0 092 $39 47 $429 00 0 08 2 577 3 04 10 2014 3 22 7 5 $429 00 6 44 2 604 34 04 10 2014 3 23 27 03374474 $429 00 23 2 Appendix CARL FORCE EitStamp AccountAnaiysis Dailyl ETC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime ETC Deposit Withdraw ETC Purchase ETC Sold PurchaSB ETC of ETC Wires Out ETC Price FEE Notes 2 605 15 14 10 2014 3 23 0 81 $429 00 0 7 2 815 34 10 2014 3 23 985620241 342281 1 1 5429 00 8 46 2 515 34 10 2014 15 32 -100 $39 200 00 $392 00 78 4 2 582 1 04 10 2014 22 01 67 0995788 04 $381 00 51 13 2 597 11 04 10 2014 22 01 15 01 $381 00 11 44 2 597 27 04 10 2014 22 01 0 159344 $381 00 0 13 2 597 75 04 10 2014 22 01 0 476 $381 00 0 37 2 615 04 10 2014 22 01 17 2550772 $381 00 13 15 2 618 25 04 11 2014 0 27 3 24807609 $350 00 2 28 2 619 25 04 11 2014 0 27 1 $350 00 0 7 2 620 87 04 11 2014 0 28 1 61801644 $350 00 1 14 2 623 03 04 11 2014 0 28 2 1570687 $350 00 1 51 2 623 5 04 11 2014 0 28 0 46957 $350 00 0 33 2 647 4 04 11 2014 0 30 23 90761198 $350 00 16 74 2 719 4 04 11 2014 0 30 72 $350 00 50 4 2 724 4 04 11 2014 0 30 5 $350 00 3 5 2 779 46 04 11 2014 0 30 55 06 1 271 00 $350 00 38 55 2 783 69 04 11 2014 0 31 4 23 480 501 $350 00 2 97 2 793 19 04 11 2014 0 31 9 5 125 $350 00 6 65 2 793 21 04 11 2014 0 31 0 012 $350 00 0 01 2 797 22 04 11 2014 0 31 4 01005 $350 00 2 81 2 820 04 11 2014 0 31 22 78760679 $350 00 15 96 2 730 29 04 11 20141 14 89 7175 $33 105 77 $369 00 66 22 2 620 04 11 2014 2 34 110 282 $40 694 23 $369 00 81 39 2 616 31 04 11 201412 37 -3 69116 $1 587 20 $430 00 3 18 2 616 3 04 11 201412 37 0 00854 $3 67 $430 00 0 01 2 616 3 04 11 2014 12 37 w0 00854 $3 67 $430 00 0 01 2 616 29 04 11 201412237 000854 $3 67 $430 00 0 01 2 521 27 04 11 201412 37 95 0171 $40 857 34 $430 00 81 72 2 520 04 11 2014 12 37 -1 26616 $544 45 $430 00 1 09 2 488 59 04 12 2014 3 06 -31_4114 $13 789 58 $439 00 27 58 2 485 48 04 12 2014 3 08 3 11409 $1 367 08 $439 00 2 74 2 482 14 04 12 2014 3 09 -3 34041 $1 466 44 $439 00 2 94 2 481 96 04 12 2014 3 09 -0 1742 $76 47 $439 00 0 16 2 464 55 04 12 2014 3 09 47 4152 $7 645 26 $439 00 15 3 2 459 74 04 12 2014 3 09 480777 $2 110 61 $439 00 4 23 2 447 58 04 12 2014 3 09 -12 16 $5 338 26 $439 00 10 68 2 447 08 04 12 2014 3 10 050351 $221 04 $439 00 0 45 2 438 72 04 12 2014 3 10 835358 $3 667 22 $439 00 7 34 2 437 96 04 12 2014 3 10 075966 $333 49 $439 00 0 67 2 432 02 04 12 2014 3 11 5 94 $2 607 66 $439 00 5 22 2 420 04 12 2014 3 15 42 0202 $5 276 88 $439 00 10 56 2 468 19 04 13 2014 11 25 48 18117934 11520 231 $420 00 40 48 2 611 23 04 13 201411 25 143 0405106 $420 00 120 16 2 641 23 04 13 2014 11 25 30 $420 00 25 2 2 651 5 04 13 2014 11 25 10 2736655 $420 00 8 63 2 721 5 04 13 2014 11 25 70 $420 00 58 8 2 729 04 13 2014 11 25 7 5046446 $420 00 6 31 2 641 04 04 14 2014 4 49 -87 9598 $38 174 54 $434 00 76 35 2 636 04 04 14 2014 4 49 -5 $2 170 00 $434 00 4 34 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily BTC USD Used to USD 'frorn Sales Type Balance Date time BTC Deposit Withdraw Purchase Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out BTC Price FEE Notes 2 604 17 04 14 2014 4 49 -31 8714 $13 832 19 $434 00 27 67 2 603 97 04 14 2014 4 49 0 2 $86 80 $434 00 0 18 2 602 84 04 14 2014 4 49 -1 13717 $493 53 $434 00 0 99 2 588 99 04 14 2014 4 49 -1 3 8502 $6 010 97 $434 00 12 03 2 575 73 04 14 2014 4 49 -13 2562 $5 753 20 $434 00 11 51 2 570 84 04 14 2014 4 49 488558 $2 120 34 $434 00 4 25 2 559 78 04 14 2014 4 50 -11 0645 $4 802 00 $434 00 9 61 2 559 58 04 14 2014 4 50 -0 2 $86 80 $434 00 0 18 2 554 45 04 14 2014 4 50 5 13001 $2 226 42 $434 00 4 46 2 429 04 14 2014 4 50 -125 445 $54 443 20 $434 00 108 89 2 329 D4l15 2014 6 47 -100 $47 500 00 $475 00 95 552 04 16 2014 17 50 222 9939 0 i 2 652 04 21 2014 10 10 100 $490 00 98 1 652 04 24 2014 12 44 0 72 Patno's ETC 2 680 3 04 25 2014 3 30 28 29535967 $484 00 27 39 2 688 87 04 25 2014 3 30 8 56889 $484 00 8 3 2 708 07 04 25 2014 3 31 19 19926 $484 00 18 59 2 715 15 04 25 2014 3 31 7 08807 $484 00 6 87 2 752 04 25 2014 3 31 3884842033 $484 00 35 67 2 755 69 04 25 2014 3 42 3 68853733 $475 00 3 51 2 778 53 04 25 2014 3 42 22 83435055 $475 00 21 7 2 789 22 04 25 2014 3 42 10 69839175 $475 00 10 17 2 793 5 04 25 2014 3 42 4 27682414 $475 00 4 07 2 793 51 04 25 2014 3 42 0 01 $475 00 0 01 2 804 21 04 25 2014 3 42 1070367265 $475 00 10 17 2 851 92 04 25 2014 3 42 47 70322358 $475 00 45 32 2 852 04 25 2014 3 42 0 085 $40 38 $475 00 0 09 2 873 16 04 25 2014 4 20 21 15334622 $465 00 19 68 2 883 16 04 25 2014 4 20 10 $465 00 9 3 2 888 16 04 25 2014 4 20 5 $465 00 4 65 2 891 15 04 25 2014 4 20 2 991 $465 00 2 79 2 891 25 04 25 2014 4 20 0 101582 $47 24 $465 00 0 1 2 903 25 04 25 2014 4 20 12 002 $465 00 11 17 2 907 33 0412512014 4 20 4 07771979 $465 00 3 8 2 907 41 04 25 2014 4 20 0 08 $37 20 $465 00 0 08 2 909 79 04 25 2014 4 20 2 38168 $465 00 2 22 2 919 09 04 25 2014 4 20 9 30276478 $465 00 8 66 2 922 46 04 25 2014 4 20 3 36785622 $465 00 3 14 2 932 25 04 25 2014 4 20 9 79 $465 00 9 11 2 934 82 04 25 2014 4 20 2 57183 $465 00 2 4 2 935 02 04 25 2014 4 20 0 2 $93 00 $465 00 0 19 2 935 12 04 25 2014 4 20 0 101938 $47 40 $465 00 0 1 2 939 92 04 25 2014 4 20 4 8 $465 00 4 47 2 949 92 04 25 2014 4 20 10 $465 00 9 3 2 954 04125 2014 4 20 4 07828299 $465 00 3 8 2 988 24 04 25 2014 11 11 34 2355074 $450 00 30 8 2 1038 24 04 25 2014 11 11 50 $450 00 45 2 1038 33 04 25 2014 11 11 0 088 $39 60 $450 00 0 08 2 1050 04 25 2014 11 11 11 6764926 $450 00 10 51 2 1054 04 25 2014 11 11 4 $450 00 3 6 Appendix CARL FORCE BitStamp Account Analysis Daily ETC USD Used to USD from Sales Type Balance Datetime BTC Deposit Withdraw BTC Purchase ETC 6on Purchase BTC of BTC Wires Out ETC Price FEE Notes 2 1126 91 14 25 2014 11 14 729055128 15 132 443 00 - 944500 84 89 2 1141 85 14 25 2014 11 14 1494249634 844500 13 3 2 1154 14 25 2014 11 14 1215189086 65 407250 3445 00 10 82 2 1124 54 14 25 2014 20 12 294652 $13 612 93 $462 00 27 23 2 962 03 04 25 2014 20 13 462 503 $75 076 58 $462 00 150 16 2 954 04 25 2014 20 14 803137 $3 710 49 $462 00 7 43 2 953 74 04 28 2014 4 33 0 26 $111 29 $428 04 0 23 2 951 22 04 28 2014 4 33 -2 52147 $1 079 19 $428 00 2 16 2 950 95 04 28 2014 4 33 -0 275 $117 70 $428 00 0 24 2 944 25 04 28 2014 4 33 -6 7 $2 867 60 $428 00 5 74 2 944 05 04 28 2014 4 33 -0 2 $85 60 $428 00 0 18 2 943 75 04 28 2014 4 34 -0 3014 $129 00 $428 00 0 26 2 943 55 04 28 2014 4 34 0 2 $85 60 $428 00 0 18 2 940 85 04 28 2014 4 35 -2 7 $1 155 60 $428 00 2 32 2 867 09 04 28 2014 4 35 -73 751 $31 565 43 $428 00 63 14 2 863 19 04 28 2014 4 35 -3 90713 $1 672 25 $428 00 3 35 2 833 04 28 2014 4 35 -30 1829 $12 918 28 $428 00 25 84 1 833 04 29 201413 12 0 180 97 1 433 04 29 2014 13 41 400 0 Ending Balance 433 2775 380513 4289 499 14495 66193 -1 0719 1 59 544 732 951 $6 484 584 87 EXHIBIT 770 BTC worth approximately $97 000 on 9 15 2013 Per records obtained from the Silk Road marketplace and Ross Ulbricht's laptop the 770 bitcoins transaction into bitcoins address 14rE7qu406P27qWC appears to the payment to Frenchmaid This transaction was a withdrawal made by Ross Ulbricht from Silk Road The sum of these 9 15 2013 2 10 UTC payments to 14rE7qu406P27qWC is 520 BTC Total BTC deposited into 14rE7qu406P27qWC 770 BTC J TRACE OF FRENCHMAID PAYOFF 9 17 2013 20 08 sends 154 BTC to 9 17 2013 20 09 sends 154 0005 BTC to i 9 20 2013 23 29 48 BTC deposited into C51 These BTC were also 9 17 2013 20 11 sends 147 BTC to UyDEeiszy7ctP6p 9 17 2013 20 12 2L 9 17 2013 20 13 All times are UTC Coordinated Universal Time traced to Silk Road wallets 9 22 2013 00 52 sends 154 BTC to 17p1Dgvame5DC232 u9vc2q9TzJe9vn5ct This address received other deposits for a tntal of 333 9995 BTC 9 22 2013 00 56 sends 154 BTC to uAaLX167rhuP1f 9 22 2013 1 08 IanGBiBQJyuTcIl ixsjk UyDEeiszy7ctP6p sends 146 9995 BTC to 9 22 2013 1 17 1N4NA DZanB74gVRed sends 154 0005 BTC to sends 154 BTC to 1L9prQdaszQT401mT xzsAqUVEkzsm 6x5 14rE sends 160 999 BTC to sends 160 9985 BTC to 1CJx8u5 5NCq5fL66wrN4n 9 22 2013 1 17 is is Carl Mark Force s CampBX address 9 29 2013 23 17 7p1 DgvameEDQ3zu9 vc2q9TzJe9vn5ct sends 154 BTC to Th 9 29 2013 13 10 7p1DgvameSDC232u9 vc2q9TzJe9vn5ct sends 189 BTC to Th mh52NHZwik13qL Is 15 Carl Mark Force's CampBX address 9 23 2013 18 13 sends 194 9995 BTC to S3TXach8$9p This is Carl Mark Force's 5 l CampBX address 9 29 2013 23 14 L9prQdaszQT4olmT sends 154 BTC to Th is is Carl Mark Force's CampBX address 9 29 2013 23 13 NCq5fL66wrN4n sends 160 9985 BTC to Th IS IS Carl Mark Force's CampBX address EXHIBIT Silk Road 1 anonymous markethace January 25 2013 20 073 bitcoins are stolen from Silk Road and Silk Road vendors and deposited into bitcoins address 12 January 26 2013 1 475 bitcoins are sent from into MtGox bitcoins address January 26 2013 another 955 are sent from into MtGox bitcoins address mrhb GzertB As of January 26 2013 account controls at least 2 430 stolen bitcoins Between March and May of 2013 account makes 9 wires to Quantum International LLC into Shaun Bridges Fidelity Account 3 6 2013 3 8 2013 3 13 2013 3 18 2013 3 19 2013 4 5 2013 4 16 2013 4 26 2013 5 7 2013 Liquidation of Silk Road Theft Proceeds Amount 98 511 08 98 968 00 99 968 62 99 968 74 99 968 64 99 968 08 99 969 34 99 969 32 25 559 37 Approx BTC Price 42 00 44 00 46 92 51 00 59 00 142 00 68 00 136 00 109 00 Approx Number of Bitcoins Sold 2345 50 2249 27 2130 62 1960 17 1694 38 704 00 1470 14 735 07 234 49 13289 15 if sold on the day it was wired out 302 May 9 2013 BRIDGES served as the affiant on a multi million dollar seizure warrant for Mt Gox and its owner s bank accounts This document is from the holdings of The National Security Archive Suite 701 Gelman Library The George Washington University 2130 H Street NW Washington D C 20037 Phone 202 994-7000 Fax 202 994-7005 nsarchiv@gwu edu