ON Strengthening the Cybersecurity of the Internet of Things TO Senate Commerce Science and Transportation Committee Security Subcommittee DATE April 30 2019 1615 H Street NW Washington DC 20062 The Chamber’s mission is to advance human progress through an economic political and social system based on individual freedom incentive initiative opportunity and responsibility The U S Chamber of Commerce is the world’s largest business federation representing the interests of more than 3 million businesses of all sizes sectors and regions as well as state and local chambers and industry associations The Chamber is dedicated to promoting protecting and defending America’s free enterprise system More than 96% of Chamber member companies have fewer than 100 employees and many of the nation’s largest companies are active members We are therefore cognizant not only of the challenges facing smaller businesses but also those facing the business community at large Besides representing a cross-section of the American business community with respect to the number of employees major classifications of American business—for example manufacturing retailing services construction wholesalers and finance—are represented The Chamber has membership in all 50 states The Chamber’s international reach is substantial as well We believe that global interdependence provides opportunities not threats In addition to the American Chambers of Commerce abroad an increasing number of our members engage in the export and import of both goods and services and have ongoing investment activities The Chamber favors strengthened international competitiveness and opposes artificial U S and foreign barriers to international business 2 Matthew J Eggers Vice President Cybersecurity Policy U S Chamber of Commerce Senate Commerce Science and Transportation Committee Security Subcommittee Strengthening the Cybersecurity of the Internet of Things April 30 2019 SUMMARY Industry and National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST leadership The business community NIST and other stakeholders are developing a core cybersecurity capabilities baseline for Internet of Things IoT devices A top U S Chamber of Commerce priority for industry is to achieve consensus on the technical criteria that support the IoT cyber baseline A win-win cybersecurity market The Chamber wants device makers service providers and buyers to gain from the development of state-of-the-art IoT components and sound risk management practices Global industry-driven standards and practices The Chamber believes that IoT cyber efforts will be most effective if they reflect global standards and industry-driven practices A fragmented global cybersecurity environment creates uncertainty for industry and splinters the resources that businesses devote to device development production and assessments Good afternoon Chairman Sullivan Ranking Member Markey and other distinguished members of the Security Subcommittee subcommittee My name is Matthew Eggers and I am the vice president of cybersecurity policy with the U S Chamber of Commerce’s Cyber Intelligence and Security Division CISD On behalf of the Chamber I welcome the opportunity to testify before the subcommittee regarding enhancing the cybersecurity and resilience of the Internet of Things IoT The Chamber welcomes the subcommittee’s dedication to examining pressing cyber matters The Chamber’s CISD was established in 2003 to develop and implement the Chamber’s homeland and national security policies The division’s Cybersecurity Working Group CWG which I lead identifies current and emerging issues crafts policies and positions and provides analysis and direct advocacy to government and business leaders In addition to the CWG I want to highlight two other groups within the Chamber that address IoT—the Chamber Technology Engagement Center C_TEC and Project Security which handles our international cyber initiatives C_TEC is at the forefront of advancing IoT deployment and innovation in the digital economy Its initiatives include working groups on autonomous vehicles 5G and unmanned aerial vehicles 1 3 Project Security is a partnership between CISD and the Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation GRC which is housed in the Chamber’s International Division Project Security works with foreign governments and multilateral forums to promote international alignment to flexible globally accepted risk-based approaches to cybersecurity Project Security has engaged more than 30 foreign governments as they create and implement their respective cybersecurity programs This engagement includes the European Commission EC and European Union EU national authorities regarding the Cybersecurity Act The act establishes EU-wide cyber certification schemes for information and communications technology ICT products services and processes including IoT devices 2 Project Security leaders meet regularly with EU officials to negotiate constructive outcomes on IoT cybersecurity It is also works with other international stakeholders such as Japan Singapore Australia and the U K to fashion consensus and industry-driven policy approaches to IoT security 3 I recognize that the subcommittee is considering legislation that addresses IoT cybersecurity However I will confine my written statement to 1 highlighting some key problems that face the IoT cyber market 2 discussing industry and NIST collaboration toward a core IoT cybersecurity baseline and 3 soliciting the subcommittee’s assistance and counsel in elevating the fruits of this partnership at home and overseas Framing Key IoT Cybersecurity Challenges It is important to frame some of the central challenges that impact the IoT cyber marketplace before discussing solutions 4 In speaking at length with stakeholders over the last two years the Chamber has identified several challenges associated with IoT cybersecurity Security risk IoT objects are potentially vulnerable targets for hackers As the number of IoT devices grows so will the potential risk of successful intrusions and increases in costs from those incidents 5 Strong IoT security should be a win-win proposition for the makers and purchasers of robust devices as well as U S economic and national security 6 Technical standards Industry and government share an interest in fostering stronger IoT security and resilience The business community and NIST are working diligently to deliver a core capabilities baseline for IoT devices that increases security is dynamic in the face of threats and is scalable internationally A top Chamber priority will be for industry to achieve consensus on the technical criteria that support the IoT cyber baseline including for consumer and industrial devices Public policy mandates The Chamber is concerned about policies at home and abroad that require specific top-down approaches to security Such mandates are unlikely to keep up with malicious actors or align with international best practices—outcomes that the Chamber presses the public and private sectors to pursue 7 4 Buyer decision making A number of IoT cyber advocates take a “build it and they will come” approach to IoT cyber which tracks with traditional rational notions of economics Yet it is unclear if buyers—including individuals households businesses and public institutions—will 1 pay for the cost of additional security features or 2 be able to identify a strong device without a nonregulatory tool to help them make educated choices 8 Most people’s intuition is to buy the least expensive device even if the device’s security is not strong—and possibly contrary to their own best interests The Chamber seeks to better understand how people make real-world choices regarding purchasing IoT technology 9 The Chamber wants to get strong devices into the networks of businesses and the hands of consumers Among other things strong IoT will yield positive externalities 10 Industry and NIST Are Developing a Core IoT Cybersecurity Baseline On February 7 2019 the Chamber and 23 organizations sent a letter to the White House to urge the administration and Congress to support NIST’s partnership with industry to strengthen IoT cybersecurity The letter called on policymakers to support NIST in convening a robust effort on IoT security Such an initiative will help stakeholders identify a flexible performance-based and cost-effective approach that can be voluntarily used by producers sellers and users of IoT devices to help them manage cyber risk and threats The Chamber stressed three points in communicating with White House officials Complement existing work This initiative should advance NIST’s ongoing IoT cyber work with industry in keeping with NIST’s February 2019 draft Considerations for a Core IoT Cybersecurity Capabilities Baseline the September 2018 draft NIST Interagency Report NISTIR 8228 Considerations for Managing IoT Cybersecurity and Privacy Risks and the administration’s November 2018 Botnet Road Map 11 Elevate U S policy The undertaking should be elevated policywise to better compete with a number of IoT cyber proposals that are being developed at home and abroad The Chamber wants this expedited effort to capture the imagination of public- and privatesector stakeholders—in essence to serve as an IoT cyber rallying point—comparable to what the popular Cybersecurity Framework does for managing enterprise risks Congress should boost the agency’s funding especially given the array of significant tasks that it undertakes with the private sector on cybersecurity and resilience Foster a market The Botnet Road Map calls for establishing robust markets for consumer and industrial devices The Chamber wants device makers service providers and consumers to profit from the business community leading the development of stateof-the-art IoT components and practices Stakeholders are trying to solve a chicken-andegg strategy problem Key next steps include advancing a market that generates both security and value for buyers and sellers Market and or policy incentives may be needed to jump-start this circle 12 5 Market and or policy catalysts Value to sellers of secure IoT More buyers of secure IoT More sellers of secure IoT Value to buyers of secure IoT IoT Cybersecurity Needs to Be Rooted in Global Industry-Driven Standards and Practices In 2015 the Chamber supported NISTIR 8074 Report on Strategic U S Government Engagement in International Standardization to Achieve U S Objectives for Cybersecurity which served as a precursor to the November 2018 NISTIR 8200 Status of International Cybersecurity Standardization for Internet of Things IoT 13 The Chamber contends that IoT cyber efforts will be most effective if they reflect global standards and industry-driven practices including the joint industry-NIST core IoT security baseline We urge Congress to leverage the following principles when crafting IoT security policy Support U S leadership in international IoT cyber forums Standards guidance and best practices relevant to cybersecurity are typically led by the private sector and adopted on a voluntary basis they are optimal when developed and recognized globally Such approaches avoid burdening multinational enterprises with the requirements of multiple and often conflicting jurisdictions The Chamber appreciates that NIST has been actively meeting with foreign governments to urge them to embrace a core IoT security capabilities baseline The Chamber urges the administration to work with international partners and believes that these discussions should be stakeholder driven and occur routinely Reduce regulatory fragmentation There is market demand for a common IoT cyber security baseline—due to a growing number of often disparate policy proposals and requirements—to chart a path for businesses and standards bodies to follow A fragmented global cybersecurity environment creates much uncertainty for device makers and buyers and splinters the resources that businesses devote to sound device development production and assessments 6 Spotlight global alignment with an industry-led baseline The Chamber believes that policymakers in the U S and abroad should align their IoT security and resilience programs with an industry-led IoT cyber capabilities baseline Achieving consensus between the business community and NIST will streamline and strengthen governmentindustry collaboration on IoT security and enable the U S to champion more effectively a core IoT cyber baseline worldwide This method should also ensure stakeholders’ cybersecurity concerns are adequately addressed and that IoT security requirements do not become an unnecessary barrier to trade Thank you for giving me a chance to convey the Chamber’s views I am happy to answer any questions Endnotes 1 The Chamber Technology Engagement Center C_TEC https www uschamber com ctec 2 In March 2019 the European Parliament approved a cybersecurity regulation commonly known as the Cybersecurity Act which was initiated approximately two years ago http www europarl europa eu sides getDoc do pubRef - EP NONSGML TA P8-TA-20190151 0 DOC PDF V0 EN In August 2017 the Chamber and six European organizations sent a letter to the European Commission regarding “measures on cybersecurity standards certification and labelling to make ICT-based systems including connected objects ” The industry groups argued that Europe like the U S can expect to benefit from economic growth brought about by the expanding IoT as long as policymakers cultivate a digital environment that avoids misguided regulations and supports pioneering businesses www uschamber com sites default files iot cybersecurity coalition _ec letter pdf 3 See Chamber and Wiley Rein LLP paper The IoT Revolution and Our Digital Security Principles for IoT Security September 2017 https www uschamber com IoT-security Readers of this testimony are encouraged to listen to “The Right Way to Solve Complex Business Problems ” Harvard Business Review’s HBR’s IdeaCast December 4 2018 https hbr org ideacast 2018 12 the-right-way-to-solve-complex-business-problems 4 5 Eric A Fischer The Internet of Things Frequently Asked Questions Congressional Research Service CRS October 13 2015 pg 14 https fas org sgp crs misc R44227 pdf Some 50 billion devices will be connected to the internet by 2020 According to the Chamber’s estimates the IoT could add roughly $15 trillion to global GDP over the next 20 years See the Chamber’s October 3 2017 testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Information Technology Subcommittee https docs house gov meetings GO GO25 20171003 106460 HHRG-115-GO25-Wstate-EggersM20171003 pdf 6 7 7 The Chamber would welcome clear steps by government officials to elevate their defense of industry and the IoT ecosystem John Beshears and Francesco Gina “Leaders as Decision Architects ” HBR May 2015 https hbr org 2015 05 leaders-as-decision-architects 8 9 Richard H Thaler Misbehaving The Making of Behavioral Economics W W Norton and Company New York 2015 10 On positive externalities see N Gregory Mankiw Principles of Economics Third Edition Thomson U S 2004 pg 207 NIST’s Cybersecurity for the Internet of Things IoT Program https www nist gov programs-projects nist-cybersecurity-iot-program 11 The Council to Secure the Digital Economy CSDE and the Consumer Technology Association CTA are coordinating the development of an industry-led consensus—which its participants call the CSDE C2 short for “convening the conveners” —regarding cybersecurity capabilities that will be common to new IoT devices The CSDE C2 project will inform NIST’s work and vice versa on identifying a core set of cybersecurity capabilities that could be a baseline for IoT devices Katerina Megas “Let’s talk about IoT device security ” the National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST February 4 2019 https www nist gov blogs i-think-therefore-iam lets-talk-about-iot-device-security https www nist gov sites default files documents 2019 02 01 final_core_iot_cybersecurity_capabilities_ baseline_considerations pdf On February 7 2019 24 associations sent a letter to the White House to urge the administration and Congress to support NIST’s efforts alongside industry to bolster IoT security https www uschamber com sites default files 2-7-19_multiassociation_wh_letter_iot_cybersecurity_final pdf Draft NISTIR 8228 Considerations for Managing Internet of Things IoT Cybersecurity and Privacy Risks September 24 2018 The Chamber commented on NISTIR 8228 on October 24 2018 https www uschamber com sites default files 10-2418_u s _chamber_comment_letter_draft_nistir_8228_final pdf The Department of Commerce and the Department of Homeland Security DHS Road Map Building a More Resilient Internet aka the Botnet Road Map November 29 2018 https www ntia doc gov blog 2018 road-map-building-more-resilient-internet This graphic was inspired in part by the Strategic Toolkits webpage “Chicken and Egg Strategy Problems ” http strategictoolkits com strategic-concepts chicken-and-egg-strategy-problems 12 13 See April 18 2018 Chamber letter to NIST on draft NISTIR 8200 Status of International Cybersecurity Standardization for Internet of Things IoT https www nist gov sites default files documents 2018 04 19 4-1818_uscc_letter_nist_draft_nistir_8200_final pdf 8
OCR of the Document
View the Document >>