Democracy Dies in Darkness Let history not partisans prosecute Trump A truth tribunal is not the answer Preserving presidential records is By Jill Lepore Jill Lepore is the David Woods Kemper Professor of American History at Harvard a staff writer at The New Yorker and the author of These Truths A History of the United States Her latest book is If Then How the Simulmatics Corporation Invented the Future Oct 16 2020 at 8 21 a m EDT ‘The most humane and reasonable way to deal with all these people if we survive this is some kind of truth and reconciliation commission ” MSNBC’s Chris Hayes tweeted this month about anti-maskers in the Trump administration Days later NPR ran a story about the possibility of a post-Trump truth and reconciliation commission This is a terrible idea In democracies a peaceful transfer of power has two elements The loser concedes without violence and the winner accepts without vengeance The first peaceful transfer of power in American history took place in 1801 when the Republican Thomas Jefferson having defeated the Federalist John Adams said in his inaugural address “If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this union or to change its republican form let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it ” This tradition might be dying but it needs reviving not burying Truth and reconciliation commissions have their origins in the post-World War II idea that formal legal responses to mass atrocities beginning with war crimes trials not only mete out justice but also prevent further violence in the form of assassinations and other kinds of retribution In 1945 Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson served as chief counsel for the United States at the trials of Nazis at Nuremberg conducted jointly by the United States France Britain and the Soviet Union “The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated so malignant and so devastating that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored because it cannot survive their being repeated ” Jackson said as he opened the prosecution “That four great nations flushed with victory and stung with injury stay the hand of vengeance and voluntarily submit their captive enemies to the judgment of the law is one of the most significant tributes that Power has ever paid to Reason ” Surely post-Trump when that day comes there will be investigations A bipartisan 9 11-style commission to study the federal government’s response to the pandemic seems not only likely but essential And Harvard Law School’s Mark Tushnet has argued for a non-prosecutorial fact-finding “commission of inquiry” to investigate possible abuses of power by the Trump-era Justice Department But the Trump administration is not Nazi Germany nor is it a nation defeated in war Its wrongdoing — a litany that includes corruption fomenting insurrection separating parents and children at the border and violently suppressing political dissent — should be investigated by journalists chronicled by historians and in some instances tried in ordinary courts Argentina Chile and El Salvador established the first truth and reconciliation commissions in the 1980s and early 1990s as an alternative to prosecutions elevating collective storytelling and chronicling over individual culpability Unlike war crimes trials such commissions expose the crimes of one’s own government mass kidnappings executions and other horrors including in South Africa the many atrocities of apartheid Influenced by the victims rights movement and the emerging field of trauma studies the commissions emphasize the importance of giving victims the chance to tell their stories for the sake of healing and for the sake of establishing a complete historical record At the convening of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission in 1996 its head Archbishop Desmond Tutu said “We are charged to unearth the truth about our dark past to lay the ghosts of the past so that they will not return to haunt us ” There are strong arguments for truth and reconciliation commissions in the United States in cases of injustice where the historical record needs assembling and a moral reckoning needs to happen and where there is no real cost to forfeiting prosecution Black Lives Matter activists have called for a truth and reconciliation commission to chronicle the long history of racial injustice in the United States from slavery to segregation to mass incarceration And last month Rep Deb Haaland D-N M and Sen Elizabeth Warren D-Mass introduced a bill to establish a Truth and Healing Commission on Indian Boarding School Policy in the United States to document “the painful and traumatic history of genocide and forced assimilation by the federal government ” according to Haaland a Laguna Pueblo whose grandparents were among the hundreds of thousands of children taken from their families as part of a federal policy to strip Indigenous peoples of their language culture and sovereignty None of the conditions of a truth and reconciliation commission apply to Trump’s four years in the White House Coming to terms with centuries of dispossession enslavement and racial violence is a very different matter from reckoning with four years of a democratically elected president who even if he loses will probably have been the choice of 2 out of 5 American voters Because a fair election is itself a verdict on an administration truth and reconciliation commissions do not take place after democratic elections — they take place during transitions from authoritarianism to democratic rule which is why this kind of proceeding is usually called “transitional justice ” Truth and reconciliation commissions do not provide a means for the winners of a democratic election to issue a verdict on the losers Democracies have all sorts of other institutions that do that investigative journalism a functioning judiciary legislative deliberation and action and dissent itself In the United States today those institutions need fortifying not bypassing “A truth commission is not a democratic institution ” as the political philosopher Nir Eisikovits has written “ More often than not countries undergoing such transitions lack a democratic tradition have no history of significant public dialogue and have not secured the minimal economic conditions required for meaningful political participation ” Democracy is in a bad way in the United States for sure But even if we need to strengthen them we still have a free press freedom of assembly the freedom of expression and meaningful and peaceful public dialogue The most compelling case for truth commissions is that they create a historical record usually of atrocities that have been covered up and whose paper trail has been shredded War crimes trials like impeachment trials follow the rules of evidence which means that not all victim testimony is admissible Truth and reconciliation commissions are not prosecutions and many are established as a substitute for prosecutions all evidence is admissible Tutu’s commission established an amnesty-for-truth rule for the sake of healing and the historical record That archival justification for such a commission is worth pondering In the aftermath of the Trump administration whenever it ends the need for a full and accurate historical record will be especially great There is every reason to fear that the administration will destroy the evidence of its malfeasance and incompetence especially its abuses of human rights its violations of the Constitution and its handling of the coronavirus pandemic Trump routinely tears up notes papers and other documents — aides call this his “filing system” — in violation of the Presidential Records Act historians’ actions against the administration on this score have so far been unsuccessful He has also ignored warnings from the National Archives and Records Administration as early as 2017 This year the Department of Homeland Security requested the destruction of “records developed to track and monitor complaints that are or will be investigated by DHS Civil Rights and Civil Liberties regarding alleged violations of civil rights and civil liberties ” The American Historical Association has protested the destruction of these and other records joining two lawsuits against the administration Stopping the destruction of records is where the real fight lies The rest is noise If Joe Biden is inaugurated in January the Justice Department might decide to pursue charges against Trump officials So might state attorneys general Biden has said such prosecutions would be a “very unusual thing and probably not very good for democracy ” New administrations in failed or failing democracies places like Argentina and the Philippines routinely bring criminal charges against opponents but this has not been the practice in the United States going back to the rejection of the Alien and Sedition Acts Biden emphasizing the independence of the Justice Department has stated that he would neither question its judgment nor interfere with its actions should it decide to pursue charges In his recent House Divided speech at Gettysburg Biden — no Lincoln — said “We are facing too many crises we have too much work to do we have too bright a future to have it shipwrecked on the shoals of anger and hate and division ” In the trade-off between prosecution and stability Biden chooses stability Much of the left does not Chris Hayes isn’t the only commentator calling for a truth tribunal “The result should be that we as a country can say ‘Here’s the truth ’ ” David M Perry a scholar of medieval history told Salon “ ‘Here’s the evidence that we know Even though the argument about what it means and what should happen will be bitter and the divisions in America will not be eased at least there will be a shared narrative and facts ’ ” This is a fantasy “To return to something that resembles a functioning and participatory democracy the country needs a period of internal reflection and public cleansing ” the American historian Kevin Baker wrote in the New Republic two years ago “Americans must at some point decide on which truths we still find self-evident If anyone has a better suggestion than truth and reconciliation have at it ” That better suggestion is the ordinary working of justice the strengthening of democratic institutions and the writing of history over time through the study of carefully preserved records Many Trump critics will find this suggestion maddeningly insufficient Given the scale of the administration’s mendacity and cruelty taking back the White House if that happens doesn’t seem like quite enough of a victory But the appetite for vengeance is a symptom of the same poison After Watergate the parties pursued what the political scientist Benjamin Ginsberg has called “politics by other means” — the politics not of elections but of investigations and indictments of members of Congress and other elected officials including the president Beginning in 1981 with Ronald Reagan’s presidency members of Congress have introduced impeachment resolutions against every single president Democrats brought Supreme Court nominations to the public in 1987 running television ads against Reagan nominee Robert Bork Getting rid of a political opponent by these means might work but it comes at the price of faith in democratic institutions including elections Do that kind of thing long enough and before you know it you get people carrying signs reading “Not My President ” meaning first Obama and only then Trump Journalism has become more prosecutorial too “Democracy dies in darkness” became The Washington Post’s motto weeks after Trump’s inauguration but under Obama it was effectively the motto of Fox News “Lock him up” cannot be the answer to “Lock her up ” In the end the strongest argument against either criminal trials or a truth tribunal should Biden win is that it would let the Democratic Party and every other institution that is not the Republican Party off the hook for driving the nation into a flaming cauldron The left is keen to blame the right But what the nation needs pretty urgently is selfreflection not only from Republicans but also from establishment Democrats and progressives and liberals and journalists and educators and activists and social media companies and honestly everyone Does The Washington Post not bear some responsibility for the state of the nation Or most of all Facebook Or CNN Or people who spit all over each other on Twitter Or the guy who shows up for a town hall meeting to talk about a budget line for reseeding the Little League baseball field and calls his opponents morons No commission can demand that each of us tell the truth about ourselves and reconcile ourselves to one another Meanwhile as for people you disagree with and probably hate let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it Updated October 17 2020 Election 2020 What to know In the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll Democratic nominee Joe Biden leads President Trump with 54 percent of likely voters favoring him vs 42 percent for Trump How to vote Find out the rules in your state Some states have already started sending out mail ballots see how to make sure yours counts Absentee and mail ballots are two terms for the same thing mostly used interchangeably Barring a landslide we may not have a result in the presidential mostly used interchangeably Barring a landslide we may not have a result in the presidential election on Nov 3 Are you running into voting problems Let us know Electoral college map Who actually votes and who do they vote for Explore how shifts in turnout and voting patterns for key demographic groups could affect the presidential race Policy Where Biden and Trump stand on key issues defining the election Battlegrounds These are the 50 political states of America Dive into Michigan Wisconsin North Carolina Florida Pennsylvania Minnesota Arizona Georgia Texas and Ohio and sign up for The Trailer and get more states plus more news and insight from the trail in your inbox three days a week Coming up Trump and Biden are scheduled to debate one more time this fall here’s what to know about the 2020 presidential debates Sign in to join the conversation