From Captured MiGs to Space “Junk” – Military and Intelligence Agents Scoured the Globe for Clues about the Enemy
Newly Declassified Documents Begin to Fill in Blanks on an Underreported Aspect of U.S. Intelligence Operations
From Captured MiGs to Space “Junk” – Military and Intelligence Agents Scoured the Globe for Clues about the Enemy
Newly Declassified Documents Begin to Fill in Blanks on an Underreported Aspect of U.S. Intelligence Operations
Washington, D.C., January 31, 2018 – Like so many treasure hunters, beachcombers, and curio shoppers, U.S. military and intelligence operatives have for decades scoured the planet for access to everything from captured surface-to-air missiles to medicines to bits and pieces of spacecraft that have fallen to Earth – all with an eye to learning something useful about America’s adversaries. “Foreign Military Exploitation” (FME) has long been a part of the intelligence-gathering repertoire, but has rarely been written about, largely for lack of declassified records on the subject.
Today’s posting by the National Security Archive, based at The George Washington University, features an array of materials dating from the Cold War that piece together the story of FME. Records from the Central Intelligence Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, State Department, National Security Council, and the U.S. Air Force describe the priorities, methods, and results of some of the U.S. government’s wide-ranging exploitation efforts, from analyzing Moscow-supplied military equipment captured by Israel during the Six-Day War, to finding a gas bottle dropped from a Soviet satellite over Wisconsin.
U.S. interest in enemy military equipment from World War II on has derived from the prospect of learning about their performance characteristics and developing possible countermeasures. During the Cold War, these efforts were mainly directed against Sino-Soviet Bloc military hardware and took place in peacetime as well as during actual conflicts. But the target list expanded dramatically to include nonmilitary items that could shed light on the scientific, technological, and economic progress of adversaries. These foreign material exploitation activities, conducted by the CIA and DoD, were often a major contributor to what was designated scientific and technical intelligence.
Today’s Electronic Briefing Book discloses some of the activities of the CIA and DoD in this field and provides helpful background and context, including describing some of the delicate political and bureaucratic maneuvering these activities entailed. James E. David, curator of national security space programs at the Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum, compiled and introduced the posting.
---------------------------------------------------
Scientific and technical (S&T) intelligence on the USSR and other nations was critical during the Cold War. The intelligence community commonly defined it as follows:
Multiple sources contributed to S&T intelligence. Foreign material exploitation - the overt or covert acquisition and analysis of military and civilian hardware and equipment – was a key one. Overhead and ground photography provided the dimensions, configurations, and other details of industrial and military facilities, weapons, weapons systems, and other equipment. The interception and analysis of telemetry from rockets, missiles, and spacecraft acquired by ships, aircraft, and ground stations (and satellites beginning in the 1960s) was essential to determining the performance characteristics of these vehicles and their missions. Acoustic, seismic, and radiological sensors of the Atomic Energy Detection System were instrumental in detecting nuclear tests and assessing the progress in nuclear weapons programs. Technical documents and scientific publications obtained overtly or covertly frequently contained relevant data. Human sources - defectors, Foreign Service officers, attaches, scientists having contact with Sino-Soviet Bloc officials, and others - furnished valuable information at times.[2]
At the national level, the collection and production of S&T intelligence was managed by a series of committees under the Intelligence Advisory Committee (1947-1958), U.S. Intelligence Board (1958-1977), and National Foreign Intelligence Board (1977-2008). The Intelligence Advisory Committee approved Director of Central Intelligence Directive (DCID) 3/3 in 1949, which created the Scientific Intelligence Committee to “plan, support and coordinate the production of scientific intelligence as it affects national security.” Chaired by a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) representative, its other members were from the three military services, the State Department, and Atomic Energy Commission. It in turn established the Joint Soviet Materials Intelligence Committee under it with representatives from the same agencies. Opposition by the services at both committees to the CIA engaging in military intelligence and exploiting hardware and equipment other than consumer goods rendered them ineffective.[3]
The Joint Soviet Materials Intelligence Committee was abolished in 1951 at the same time that the Joint Chiefs of Staff established the Joint Materiel Intelligence Agency under its Joint Intelligence Committee. Its mission was to coordinate the collection and analysis of captured equipment and other foreign materials by the services, ensure the prompt dissemination of intelligence derived therefrom, liaison with allies engaged in similar exploitation activities, and liaison with the CIA concerning the exploitation of foreign non-military materials. Headed by a Director, the committee also had an Advisor who represented the interest of the CIA, State Department, and Atomic Energy Commission, and representatives of the three services. The previous friction between the CIA and the services soon disappeared and a good working relationship developed. In 1953, the Joint Technical Intelligence Subcommittee under the Joint Intelligence Committee assumed the responsibilities of the Joint Materiel Intelligence Agency.[4]
The Scientific Estimates Committee established by DCID 3/4 in 1952 replaced the Scientific Intelligence Committee. It provided that the Department of Defense (DoD) was primarily responsible for S&T intelligence on weapons, weapons systems, military equipment and techniques, and relevant R&D and the CIA for basic sciences, scientific resources, non-military medicine, and relevant R&D. Members were from the CIA, Joint Staff, State Department, the three services, and the Atomic Energy Commission. The Scientific Estimates Committee was barred from producing studies and, as a result, much of its work involved contributions to National Intelligence Estimates and National Intelligence Surveys. It tried to guide the production activities of the member agencies with mixed success and also published annual lists of their S&T intelligence publications. The Intelligence Advisory Committee transferred responsibility for S&T intelligence on nuclear programs to the new Joint Atomic Energy Committee and on guided missiles and space programs to the new Guided Missiles and Astronautics Intelligence Committee in the late 1950s.[5]
In 1959, DCID 3/5 created the Scientific Intelligence Committee with the same membership. The new directive removed the restrictions of its predecessor and instead provided that the CIA “shall produce scientific and technical intelligence as a service of common concern and as required to fulfill the statutory responsibilities of the Director of Central Intelligence” and that “the other departments or agencies shall produce scientific and technical intelligence pertinent to their departmental missions.” It also lifted the prohibition on publishing studies. As a result, the new committee generated interdepartmental reports and continued to contribute to National Intelligence Estimates. It also had greater success in allocating production responsibilities to the member agencies.[6]
The 1961 directive creating Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assigned to it the tasks of programming and coordinating all DoD S&T intelligence programs and activities and conducting liaison with the CIA in this area. Its Directorate of Science and Technology quickly established the Foreign Material Exploitation Program. Among other things, under the program a Foreign Materials Requirements Listing was prepared setting forth the exact items to be acquired and their priority, Specific Intelligence Collection Requests were sent to DoD elements and the CIA to affect their acquisition, and each item was assigned to one of the services for technical analysis.[7]
In 1950, the CIA created the Soviet Material (Sovmat) Staff in the Office of Operations under the Deputy Director (Plans) to lead its foreign material exploitation efforts. It soon moved under the Deputy Director (Intelligence). A small organization, the Sovmat Staff requested other CIA elements or the DoD to conduct the collection and similarly arranged for other CIA offices, the DoD, civilian government agencies, or contractors to perform the analysis. For many years, it disseminated the finished intelligence in CIA Information Reports. At some unknown date the office was renamed the Foreign Material Office.[8]
Each military service had its own programs for foreign material exploitation, with their focus on the service’s area of operational responsibility. Air Force programs were primarily managed by the Air Technical Intelligence Center (which was renamed the Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center in 1959 and then the Foreign Technology Division two years later), the Army’s by the individual technical services (which were then consolidated into the Foreign Science and Technology Center in 1962), and the Navy’s by the Scientific and Technological Intelligence Center. Although these organizations performed a great deal of analysis themselves, they also employed contractors at times. They disseminated the finished intelligence in a wide range of publications.[9]
The CIA and DoD obtained the material through various means. U.S. and allied forces captured military hardware and equipment on the battlefield or were given access to them when previously supplied to a country now friendly to the United States. Defectors occasionally flew aircraft to allied nations. Pieces of missiles, rockets, or spacecraft that survived reentry and returned to Earth were collected. A wide range of non-military equipment, from electronic devices to medicines, was purchased or otherwise acquired by Foreign Service personnel, defense attachés, civilian scientists, and others who had contact with Soviet officials.
Foreign material exploitation has not been covered in depth by the open literature, primarily because almost all the documents have remained classified through the decades. Notable exceptions include Jeffrey Richelson’s treatment of technical intelligence in his series The U.S. Intelligence Community, Matthew Aid’s 2010 Electronic Briefing Book Project Azorian, The CIA’s Declassified History of the Glomar Explorer, and the author’s “Was It Really ‘Space Junk’? US Intelligence Interest in Space Debris that Returned to Earth”, Astropolitics, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Spring 2005).
In recent years, the declassification of additional records by the CIA and DIA have shed more light on the subject. There are still major gaps, but the new documents enable a more comprehensive history to be told than before.
Document 01
National Archives, Record Group (RG) 342 (non-headquarters Air Force commands and organizations), Entry P 2129, Box 22
The MiG-15 was a capable fighter during the Korean War. High on the priority list of enemy material to be collected and analyzed, U.S. forces salvaged a few parts from a crashed aircraft in April 1951. Another opportunity arose when one crashed off the west coast of North Korea in early July 1951. U.S., British, and South Korean forces participated in a salvage operation that recovered almost the entire aircraft. In both cases, the material was quickly shipped to the Air Technical Intelligence Center in Dayton, Ohio, for analysis.
Document 02A
National Archives, RG 342, Entry P 2129, Box 22 and Entry P 280, Box 2
An Air Technical Intelligence Center report on the MiG-15 engine and other parts collected in April 1951 which was reproduced in a Far East Air Force intelligence publication.
Document 02B
National Archives, RG 342, Entry P 2129, Box 22 and Entry P 280, Box 2
An article discussing the intelligence from exploitation of the two MiG-15s, Yak-9 (a World War II fighter), Yak-11 (a trainer), and an IL-10 (a World War II ground attack aircraft) on their materials, manufacturing methods, and rubber and plastic components.
Document 03
CIA Records Search Tool (CREST) database
The Central Intelligence Bulletin was a CIA publication first published in the early 1950s and distributed to high-level officials. The Danish government was not permitting flight tests of a Polish MiG-15 which landed in Denmark for unknown reasons. Illustrating the diplomatic sensitivities involved in many exploitation projects, it insisted that the covert examination of the aircraft by British and U.S. personnel be completed within five days.
Document 04
CREST database
The Intelligence Advisory Committee submitted periodic reports to the National Security Council on the foreign intelligence program. Section VII details the progress and deficiencies in S&T intelligence on Soviet conventional armaments, guided missiles, biological and chemical warfare programs, and basic R&D. Section XII discusses collection, including of foreign materials and equipment.
Document 05
CREST database
This document details the background to the formation of the Sovmat Staff in July 1950 to acquire and analyze Soviet material for purposes of S&T intelligence, its operations and successes through January 1952, the disputes with the military members of the Joint Soviet Materials Intelligence Committee under the original Scientific Intelligence Committee, and their eventual resolution in the newly established Joint Materiel Intelligence Agency.
Document 06
This Office of Research and Reports memo stated that it relied on the Sovmat Program as a source of economic information but believed the Sovmat Program was falling short of its potential in several important respects.
Document 07
National Archives, RG 263 (CIA), Entry A1 19, Box 12
Among other things, this report stated that in the two years in question the Sovmat Staff acquired 1,815 items, of which 922 were analyzed (about 45% in U.S. government facilities and the remainder in private sector facilities). The services acquired 2,398 items during this period, but there is no breakdown of how many were analyzed. There is no information available on what any of the items were. In contrast to earlier years, the coordination between the CIA and DoD at the Joint Technical Intelligence Subcommittee was good.
Document 08
CREST database
This joint product of the Intelligence Advisory Committee’s Scientific Intelligence Committee, Joint Atomic Energy Intelligence Committee, and Guided Missile Intelligence Committee was prepared to advance the Priority National Intelligence Objectives approved by the Intelligence Advisory Committee and set forth in DCID 1/3. The highest priority objectives concerned Soviet nuclear weapons and the bombers, guided missiles, and submarines to deliver them.
Document 09
CREST database
The CIA’s S&T intelligence research and production program was centered in the Office of Scientific Research at this time. This excerpt contains the introduction and table of contents to the planned FY 1959 program, much of which addressed the priorities in Document No. 8 above. Other parts of the program contributed to National Intelligence Surveys, National Intelligence Estimates, and supported the electronic intelligence collection effort.
Document 10
CREST database
This directive established the Scientific Intelligence Committee under the new U.S. Intelligence Board. It replaced the Scientific Estimates Committee and was charged with developing and coordinating the S&T intelligence activities throughout the intelligence community. The directive eliminated the limitations on the CIA’s area of responsibility and the prohibition on generating intelligence reports.
Document 11
National Archives, RG 263, Entry A1 19, Box 12
In FY 1960, the Sovmat Staff acquired 423 items and published 98 intelligence reports, while the three services acquired 1,232 items. The leading Soviet items collected were electronic equipment and then scientific and biological samples. One growing source of objects were those obtained by U.S. scientists visiting Soviet scientific institutes. There were also an increasing number of items acquired from Communist China.
Document 12
This directive updated the assignment to the DIA of overall management and guidance of DoD’s S&T intelligence program.
Document 13
CREST database
This is a draft U.S. Intelligence Board response to the S&T intelligence portion of the October 1961 President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board’s report to President Kennedy. Intelligence on the Sino-Soviet Bloc’s basic scientific and technical capabilities was satisfactory but there were some gaps. Lack of translation capacity prevented the increased exploitation of the growing amount of open scientific literature and the development of machines for translation was required. With respect to foreign material exploitation, more items needed to be acquired and the actual analysis of many items needed to be accelerated.
Document 14
CREST database
The enclosure describes the results of the examination by the U.S. Navy of subminiature tubes used in certain radio equipment.
Document 15
CREST database
This article describes the planning and execution of an operation to examine a Lunik spacecraft in an unnamed foreign county while on a tour of Soviet industrial articles and space vehicles, as well as some of the intelligence derived therefrom. Dino Brugioni stated that the country was Mexico in his Eyes in the Sky: Eisenhower, the CIA, and Cold War Aerial Espionage.
Document 16
National Archives, RG 330 (Office of the Secretary of Defense), Entry UD-06W 30, Box 10
In the early 1960s the Soviets began testing intercontinental ballistic missiles to a mid-Pacific impact area. It deployed ships to acquire the telemetry and other data from the reentry vehicles to assess their performance. The United States also deployed ships and aircraft with various sensors to the area in an attempt to learn their dimensions, configurations, and performance characteristics. The United States was also developing a deep-sea vehicle under Project SAND DOLLAR to locate and recover the reentry vehicles or their pieces from the ocean floor for technical analysis.
Document 17
National Archives, RG 373 (DIA), Entry UD-05D 60, Box 1
This memo requested the Secretary of Defense provide $100,000 to the DIA for the acquisition of a Soviet Minsk-2 computer arranged through the CIA’s Sovmat Staff.
Document 18
CREST database
SA-2 surface-to-air missiles were a deadly threat to U.S. and allied aircraft. This entry on the missile was from the Scientific Intelligence Digest, a periodic publication of the CIA’s Office of Scientific Intelligence. As best as can be determined, the intelligence community had not yet obtained any components of the system for exploitation and the information came from other sources.
Document 19
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60, Box 2
The MI-8 HIP entered service around 1960 as both a transport helicopter and gunship. In this memo, the DIA Director informed the Army that it would not be exploiting the helicopter and instead it should instruct the CIA to ship the aircraft to Holloman AFB.
Document 20
CIA FOIA Electronic Reading Room
The President’s Daily Brief was the highest level intelligence publication of the CIA and was only distributed to the president and a few advisors. The YAK-28 Firebar which had crashed in West Berlin and had been salvaged for exploitation entered service in the mid-1960s as an all-weather interceptor.
Document 21
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60, Box 3
Information given by the CIA to the DoD on the SA-2 contributed to the development of countermeasures which had reduced aircraft losses over North Vietnam. Nevertheless, there was still a very high priority requirement to acquire additional technical data, particularly concerning the system’s FAN SONG radars.
Document 22
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60, Box 3
Notwithstanding the exploitation of SA-2 missile guidance antennas just obtained by the CIA and ongoing collection efforts against certain other key components, there were still many technical details of the system that remained unknown.
Document 23
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60, Box 3
The Ghanaian Army had received substantial ground forces equipment from the USSR and was now making it available to the United States. While the DIA would oversee the exploitation, the CIA was interested in certain small arms and ammunition for use in operations and the Army the same for training purposes.
Document 24
CREST database
This internal CIA memo listed the major components of the SA-2 missile that still needed to be obtained for exploitation.
Document 25
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60, Box 4
The Israelis captured an enormous amount of Soviet equipment in the Six-Day War which the DoD sought to exploit. While the CIA was taking the lead in negotiating with the Israelis on access, the DIA was coordinating the DoD’s plans for examination and analysis.
Document 26
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60, Box 4
From 1962-1970, royalist forces backed by Saudi Arabia and Jordan fought republican forces backed by Egypt and the USSR. Among the weapons used by the republican forces were Soviet chemical agents. Such agents were high on the DIA’s Foreign Material Requirements Listing, and the DIA prepared a Specific Intelligence Collection Request to obtain them.
Document 27
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60, Box 4
The U.S. technical exploitation project for this material was designated MEXPO. Working through CIA channels and coordinating with the State Department, U.S. personnel had gained access to lower priority items in Israel, but had not yet gained access to high priority ones such as SA-2 components.
Document 28
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60, Box 4
U.S. personnel had finally gained access to the SA-2 components in Israel, but the Israelis were resisting their removal to the United States for the time being. However, the FAN SONG computer and radar vans had been so severely damaged that their exploitation was impossible. There was still a high priority requirement to bring a complete SA-2 system or its major electronic components to the United States for analysis and testing.
Document 29
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60 Box 4
With the assistance of the CIA, DoD technical personnel had been granted access to all the captured equipment. Phase A exploitation of many of the items in Israel by joint U.S./Israeli teams had been completed, and the Phase A exploitation of the remaining items in Israel was to be completed in 1968. Phase B, the joint exploitation of certain equipment in the United States, and Phase C, the gift or sale to the United States of certain material, had not been scheduled yet.
Document 30
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 60, Box 4
Earlier that month, CIA, DoD, and Israeli Intelligence Service representatives met at CIA headquarters on Project MEXPO. The memorandum forwarded with this memo is not in the file.
Document 31
National Archives, RG 59 (Department of State), 1967-1969 Central Foreign Policy Files, Box 3023
In contrast to the good cooperation between the CIA and DoD in other areas of foreign material exploitation, the two organizations could not agree on a division of responsibilities with respect to foreign space debris which had returned to Earth. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 provided in part that space debris which landed on Earth was the property of the launching nation and that such debris be returned to that country. The treaty finally gave the State Department the leverage to forge a government-wide policy on the exploitation of foreign space debris. The CIA, DoD, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration quickly agreed to the State Department proposal contained in this memo.
Document 32
National Archives, RG 342, Entry UD-WW 1274, Box 4
The Soviet Atoll was a copy of the U.S. AIM-9B Sidewinder. Many North Vietnamese MiGs carried them but they had limited success against U.S. aircraft. This U.S. Air Force Foreign Technology Division publication set forth the plan for the continuing exploitation of an Atoll fuze.
Document 33
National Archives, RG 342, Entry UD-WW 1274, Box 2
This DIA report, based in part on foreign material exploitation reports, detailed the metals, ceramics, and composite materials used in the three types of vehicles.
Document 34A
National Archives, RG 59, 1967-1969 Central Foreign Policy Files, Box 3029 and 1970-1973 Subject Numeric Files, Box 2961
The new government-wide procedures adopted in 1967 on acquiring foreign space debris for exploitation were implemented in the case of unidentified fragments that fell in Nepal and which were not claimed by any country.
Document 34B
National Archives, RG 59, 1967-1969 Central Foreign Policy Files, Box 3029 and 1970-1973 Subject Numeric Files, Box 2961
Nepal gave permission to the United States to examine the debris in Nepal. The team reported that it could not determine the country of origin and would have to examine it in the United States to identify the country of origin.
Document 34C
National Archives, RG 59, 1967-1969 Central Foreign Policy Files, Box 3029 and 1970-1973 Subject Numeric Files, Box 2961
Because of Nepalese concerns about mutilating the debris, an agreement was reached that a fragment could be taken to the United States if it were returned without noticeable damage.
Document 34D
National Archives, RG 59, 1967-1969 Central Foreign Policy Files, Box 3029 and 1970-1973 Subject Numeric Files, Box 2961
By early 1972, the exploitation of the fragment was completed and it was being returned with little or no change in appearance.
Document 35
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 44, Box 1
This is a DIA response to an inquiry from the Office of the Secretary of Defense concerning any correlation between the age of Soviet aircraft and in-flight failures. The inquiry was apparently triggered by a crash of a Bear maritime patrol plane off the Canadian coast in August 1976.
Document 36
CIA FOIA Electronic Reading Room
MiG-25s entered service in the late 1960s. In August 1976, a Soviet pilot defected and flew one to Japan. The United States debriefed the pilot and granted him asylum. The USSR demanded the immediate return of the aircraft, which the Japanese government agreed to but only after the examination by U.S. and Japanese exploitation teams was completed.
Document 37
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 44, Box 1
U.S. allies sought access to the results of the exploitation of the MiG-25. This memo contains the DIA’s recommendations as to exactly what data should be released to what countries.
Document 38
CREST database
This CIA Directorate of Intelligence report set forth the results of the examination of several Soviet weapons systems, including two aircraft, four surface-to-air missile systems, and five articles of ground force equipment. Although the source of the equipment is unknown, it was probably Egypt.
Document 39
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 99, Box 1
The F-6 was the Chinese version of the MiG-19 and entered service in the 1960s. In July 1977, a Chinese pilot defected and flew his F-6/MiG-19 to Taiwan. Joint teams exploited the aircraft under Project HAVE BOAT, and the Republic of China offered certain components which could be brought back to the United States for additional examination.
Document 40
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 99, Box 1
A joint DIA-CIA project codenamed MOP RACK sought to acquire eight Soviet military articles, each of which was assigned to one of the three services for exploitation.
Document 41
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 101, Box 2
Somalia invaded Ethiopia in 1977-1978 to reclaim the Ogaden region. With extensive Soviet and Cuban support, Ethiopia successfully fought off the attack. The two MiGs discussed in this memo probably crashed in Somalia in that conflict.
Document 42
National Archives, RG 373, Entry UD-05D 103, Box 1
The Soviets had supported Somalia for many years until its 1977 invasion of Ethiopia, at which time it began backing Ethiopia. The support had included extensive military equipment, which the United States was now exploiting under Project GREEN ECHO.
Document 43
CIA FOIA Electronic Reading Room
The Israelis captured many weapons in its 1982 invasion of Lebanon. In this memo, the CIA requested the assistance of the Secretary of Defense in acquiring shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missile systems, mines, and grenades to supply insurgencies the United States was supporting.
Document 44
CIA FOIA Electronic Reading Room
Earlier efforts to acquire weapons apparently were not completely successful and this led to another request to the Secretary of Defense for assistance in this regard.
[1] Department of Defense Directive 5105.28, “Defense Intelligence Agency (Technical Intelligence)”, April 27, 1964 in Deane J. Allen and Brian G. Shellum, eds., At the Creation, 1961-1965 (Washington, D.C.: DIA History Office, 2002), pp. 379-385.
[2] Robert M. Clark, “Scientific and Technical Intelligence Analysis”, Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Spring 1975), CREST (CIA Records Search Tool) database. Dino Brugioni, Eyes in the Sky; Eisenhower, the CIA, and Cold War Aerial Intelligence (Naval Institute Press: Annapolis, 2010), pp. 50-64.
[3] The Office of Scientific Intelligence, 1949-1968, Volume Two, Annexes IV, V, VI, and VII, CREST database. “Office of Operations, Sovmat Staff, n.d., CREST database.
[4] “Report of Survey Central Intelligence Agency Task Force on Intelligence Activities”, n.d., CREST database. “Defense Intelligence Agency (Technical Intelligence).” “Military Security-Captured Enemy Materiel”, 6 July 1961, CREST database.
[5] Ibid.
[6] The Office of Scientific Intelligence, 1949-1968, Volume Two, Annexes IV, V, VI, and VII.
[7] Ibid. “Intelligence Priorities for the Sciences and Technologies”, September 1975, CREST database.
[8] “Report of Survey of Central Intelligence Agency Task Force on Intelligence Activities.”
[9] Albert Wheelon, Deputy Director for Science and Technology to Executive Director-Comptroller, 16 December 1964, CREST database.